3376 items matching your search terms
...first determination was issued on 6 October 2017, ordering ZRNL to pay Mr Pelabon $10,824.07 in wages, holiday pay and compensation.1 In a 1 Pelabon v Zumo Retail Nelson Ltd [2017] NZERA Wellington 101. subsequent determination of 2 February 2018, the Authority ordered ZRNL to contribute $2,250 towards costs associated with Mr Pelabon’s substantive claim.2 Neither determination was challenged. [3] Since ZRNL did not pa...
...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 [50] The complainant sent an email to the Tribunal on 11 August 2019 stating that his daughter’s visa was declined two months prior to him being notified. The communications on multiple occasions were...
...4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 File management 26. A licensed immigration adviser must: … b. confirm in writing to the client when applications have been lodged, and make on-going timely updates c. confirm in writing to the client th
...Chart F.5 Average Age (Days) of Active Appeals 30 June 2013 30 June 2014 30 June 2015 30 June 2016 30 June 2017 30 June 2018 30 June 2019 Tribunal Average (days) 247 228 208 201 175 175 274 Residence 240 134 173 116 60 101 76 Deportation (Non-resident) 228 230 184 127 90 89 121 Refugee and Protection 329 248 215 159 137 98 142 Deportation (Resident) 425 425 361 500 574 481 604 Comparative Graph Showing Average Age of Active Appeals...
...when commission was paid could be accurately predicted. It also meant that commission might be payable on a public holiday if the respective 4 GD (Tauranga) Ltd v Price and others [2019] NZEmpC 101. date when a sale became unconditional fell on a public holiday. If that was not the case, then ordinary salary without commission would be received by the salesperson for the public holiday in the usual way, with the payment bein...
...7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 8, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 Legislative requirements 3. A licensed immigration adviser must: … c. whether in New Zealand or offshore, act in accordance with New Zealand immigration legislation, including the Immigration Act 2009, t
...writer counsellor something else. 100 How were you related to the child or children in the family dispute? parent guardian grandparent whānau / family Other 101 Is there anything else you would like to tell us? 102 How to have your say Thank you for taking the time to read and answer questions about the 2014 changes to the family justice system....
...they never contacted the respondents until completion of the remedial works, more than 8 years after they obtained the WHRS report and following the demolition of the original house. The Court in Hermann15 considered this a relevant factor. [101] The delay deprived the first respondent of any opportunity to observe and challenge the claimed defects and his alleged responsibility for them. That delay is inexcusable and has caused actual prejudice to the first respondent. [10...
...is truly definitional, in that it defines who is Māori. It is, however, somewhat circular. The second part is supplementary to the true definition, in that it includes a descendant of anyone who satisfies the true definition. 447 Aotea MB 101 (b) Second, is it is defined in the singular. It applies to a particular person, including a descendant (singular) of that person. It is not defined in the plural. Put another way, it does not itself define a class or group. (...
...Moreover, as I have outlined above, the circumstances in which a Review Officer might interfere with a Committee’s decision to lay charges in the Disciplinary Tribunal are rare, and generally arise when the Committee has misfired in some way. [101] The matters raised before me by Mr UOY are, in my view, proper ones for the Tribunal to consider. They require careful assessment of all of the evidence, and matching that evidence against the legislative standards of misconduct, neglige...