Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 101- Stewart v Accident Compensation Corporation (25 May 2022) [pdf, 164 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 101 ACR 68/22 and 69/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN GAYE STEWART Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: K Koloni for the Appellant R Wanigasekera for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 25 May 2022...

2. OIA-108973.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 Total name suppression Total 376 365 424 394 442 387 387 488 515 575 European 235 251 262 263 272 249 239 301 320 337 Maori 88 72 95 72 97 76 78 119 101 114 Pacific Peoples 25 16 26 32 29 18 24 31 32 41 Asian 25 10 22 16 29 18 28 28 35 33 Other 7 10 9 7 10 14 15 8 9 9 Unknown 7 18 19 16 17 17 16 18 27 52 Interim and fina l Total 91 107 90 96 119 101 109 128 144 128 European 55 8...

3. Katu v Peni - Tiroa E and Te Hape B (2015) 105 Waikato Maniapoto MB 157 (105 WMN 157) [pdf, 405 KB]

   ...Māori Act 1993 AND BETWEEN BARBARA KOHINETERAUPARA MOANA Applicant 105 Waikato Maniapoto MB 158 Hearing: 80 Waikato Maniapoto MB 184-202 dated 1 May 2014 98 Waikato Maniapoto MB 8-68 dated 4 May 2015 101 Waikato Maniapoto MB 26-61 dated 30 June 2015 (Heard at Te Kuiti) Appearances: S Webster for Hardie Peni as respondent Judgment: 7 September 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD

4. [2022] NZEnvC 129 The Wellington Diocesan Board of Trustees v Palmerston North City Council [pdf, 13 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Court: Date of Order: Date of Issue: Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 129 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN THE WELLINGTON DIOCESAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND (ENV-2021-WLG-000015) Appellant/ Applicant PAUvIERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge B P Dwyer sitting alone under s 279 of the Act 20 July 2022 20 July 2022

5. People charged and convicted offences June 2021 [xlsx, 271 KB]

   ...1980/1981 1981/1982 1982/1983 1983/1984 1984/1985 1985/1986 1986/1987 1987/1988 1988/1989 1989/1990 1990/1991 1991/1992 1992/1993 1993/1994 1994/1995 1995/1996 1996/1997 1997/1998 1998/1999 1999/2000 2000/2001 2001/2002 2002/2003 2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 17481 30291 23905 28281 36079 28573 28201 29928 24691 23199 20680 23643 23217 20985 23775...

6. Taylor v Taylor - Estate of Waerena Taylor (2014) 102 Waiariki MB 258 (102 WAR 258) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...– Estate of Whakaahua Walker [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 500 (2011 APPEAL 500) 3 Hohua – Estate of Tangi Biddle or Hohua (2001) 10 Waiariki Appellate Court MB 43 (10 APRO 43) 4 Bennett – Estate of Ronald Clifford Bennett (2014) 101 Waiariki MB 290 (101 WAR 290) 102 Waiariki MB 262 entitled to succeed. In other cases it is not. A third variation is where those children of the deceased who agree to inclusion of a whāngai do so by way of gift of part of their ent...

7. ID v QW LCRO 222 / 2010 (29 September 2011) [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...Practitioner’s wife had a short involvement with the matrimonial file at its conclusion. Procedural issue [11] Before embarking on a discussion it is relevant to note that the Committee ought to have made its determination pursuant to section 101 of the Law Practitioners Act 1982. By virtue of Sections 353 and 356 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act the Standards Committee was acting as a Complaints Committee under that Act, and obliged to consider the complaint as if the Law P...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 238 Neil v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...discussed, considerations of justice and equity, as required under s 57(3)(d), operate to strengthen the argument against admissibility, having regard to the purpose and objectives of the Act.7 5 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 143(b)–(c) and 101(a–ab). 6 Evidence Act 2006, s 57(2A). 7 Sections 101 and 3(a)(v)–(vi). [22] There are no extraordinary circumstances which point to this being one of the rare cases where disclosure of what was said at mediation would...

9. Ormsby v Ormsby - Aorangi B No.1A No. 3 [2018] Maori Appellate Court MB 547 (2018 APPEAL 547) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...Gilling also sought to adduce further evidence. For reasons that are set out below, even though such an application should have been filed at the time the notice of 1 163 Waikato Maniapoto MB 97-101 (163 WMN 97-101) 2 163 Waikato Maniapoto MB 97-101 (163 WMN 97-101) at 99 3 Ibid 4 Memorandum of Counsel – Request to join Co-Appellants, dated 8 October 2018 5 2018 Chief Judge’s MB 558 (2018 CJ 558) 2018 Māori Appellate Cou...

10. XS v HS [2025] NZDT 101 (22 May 2025) [pdf, 174 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 101 APPLICANT XS RESPONDENT HS The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. XS is the father of HS, and HS says they have been estranged since late 2024. 2. XS’ $5000.00 claim is for two payments made in Jan 2023 and March 2023 for $2500.00 each. The parties agree that the money was for an overseas trip HS went on f...