Search Results

1. [2017] NZEmpC 12 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...promoting good faith behaviour, jurisdiction to determine them in such manner and to make such decisions and orders, not inconsistent with this or any other Act…, as in equity and good conscience it thinks fit.” See too s 221. See also s 101: “The object of this Part is — (a) to recognise that, in resolving employment relationship problems, access to both information and mediation services is more important than adherence to rigid formal procedures; …”. 14 Frankton...

2. LCRO 13/2019 RA v LO (23 September 2019) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...in protection order proceedings which provide assurances that a party will not act in a particular way, inevitably proceed from the starting point that the applicant bringing the application considers themselves to be in need of protection. [101] It may be that adding an introduction to the undertaking which acknowledged that Ms RA provided the undertaking with no admission of responsibility for the conduct alleged in Mr A’s application, may have made Ms RA feel more comfortable...

3. [2019] NZEmpC 45 Chambers v Pelabon [pdf, 347 KB]

   ...first determination was issued on 6 October 2017, ordering ZRNL to pay Mr Pelabon $10,824.07 in wages, holiday pay and compensation.1 In a 1 Pelabon v Zumo Retail Nelson Ltd [2017] NZERA Wellington 101. subsequent determination of 2 February 2018, the Authority ordered ZRNL to contribute $2,250 towards costs associated with Mr Pelabon’s substantive claim.2 Neither determination was challenged. [3] Since ZRNL did not pa...

4. [2020] NZIACDT 41 - TBE v Proudman (30 September 2020) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 [50] The complainant sent an email to the Tribunal on 11 August 2019 stating that his daughter’s visa was declined two months prior to him being notified. The communications on multiple occasions were...

5. NJUM v Vole [2020] NZIACDT 5 (29 January 2020) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 File management 26. A licensed immigration adviser must: … b. confirm in writing to the client when applications have been lodged, and make on-going timely updates c. confirm in writing to the client th

6. Immigration & Protection Tribunal Annual Report 2018-2019 [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...Chart F.5 Average Age (Days) of Active Appeals 30 June 2013 30 June 2014 30 June 2015 30 June 2016 30 June 2017 30 June 2018 30 June 2019 Tribunal Average (days) 247 228 208 201 175 175 274 Residence 240 134 173 116 60 101 76 Deportation (Non-resident) 228 230 184 127 90 89 121 Refugee and Protection 329 248 215 159 137 98 142 Deportation (Resident) 425 425 361 500 574 481 604 Comparative Graph Showing Average Age of Active Appeals...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 64 Max Pennington Motors Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...when commission was paid could be accurately predicted. It also meant that commission might be payable on a public holiday if the respective 4 GD (Tauranga) Ltd v Price and others [2019] NZEmpC 101. date when a sale became unconditional fell on a public holiday. If that was not the case, then ordinary salary without commission would be received by the salesperson for the public holiday in the usual way, with the payment bein...

8. INZ (Greathead) v Ortiz [2019] NZIACDT 59 (29 August 2019) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 8, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 Legislative requirements 3. A licensed immigration adviser must: … c. whether in New Zealand or offshore, act in accordance with New Zealand immigration legislation, including the Immigration Act 2009, t

9. Easy read: Have your say on the family justice system [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   ...writer counsellor something else. 100 How were you related to the child or children in the family dispute? parent guardian grandparent whānau / family Other 101 Is there anything else you would like to tell us? 102 How to have your say Thank you for taking the time to read and answer questions about the 2014 changes to the family justice system....

10. Gwak & Kim TRI-2020-100-006 Procedural Order 5 [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...they never contacted the respondents until completion of the remedial works, more than 8 years after they obtained the WHRS report and following the demolition of the original house. The Court in Hermann15 considered this a relevant factor. [101] The delay deprived the first respondent of any opportunity to observe and challenge the claimed defects and his alleged responsibility for them. That delay is inexcusable and has caused actual prejudice to the first respondent. [10...