Search Results

1. [2018] NZEmpC 93 Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 360 KB]

   ...paragraphs relate to the same issue as was referred to at para 7 of Mr Dippie’s brief. For the reasons given with regard to those paragraphs, I consider the evidence in paras 6 and 7 of Mr Finn-House’s brief is inadmissible. Paragraph 8 [101] The evidence in para 8 replicates that which is set out at para 8 of Mr Dippie’s evidence. For the same reason as was given in connection with his evidence, I rule that the evidence in Mr Finn-House’s brief at para 8 is inadmissible...

2. DJ v Dua [2019] NZIACDT 6 (14 February 2019) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...1 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 2 Section 49(3) & (4). 3 Section 50. 4 Section 51(1). 5 Section 53(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 passport. They were then deported. All of these things happened because Mr Dua did not properly represent them. [51] At the request of the Tribunal, further documents were provided by the Registrar on 8 Fe

3. Hunia v New Zealand Police [2021] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...to any 13 other meaning. The ICCPR right to privacy was not incorporated into New Zealand domestic law by the Bill of Rights. [56.4] As submitted by the Police, employees of the Police have no reasonable expectation (Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305) that information obtained as a result of a criminal investigation will not be used for the purpose of misconduct inquiries. The Police occupy a unique position of power and responsibility. The Police Code of Conduct and...

4. LCRO 73/2019 LM v NO (27 July 2020) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...Deed proceedings, he “hadn’t resolved whether to act” in those proceedings. But he acknowledged a “hypothetical” retainer. [100] It is, as I have said above, inconceivable that Mr NO could have acted for S against PQ, at any stage. [101] If Mr NO could not have acted for S in the Deed proceedings themselves, how could he have given him advice about those proceedings which included advising him to name PQ – his other client – as a defendant? [102] In my view it matte...

5. LCRO 2/2019 RCN and OCN as Trustees v MA, JS, LB and GD (27 May 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...adjudicator did not award costs to [Company C] which 17 would usually follow a successful claim. In this regard, the adjudicator acknowledged to some extent the merits of the submissions made by [Law firm A]. The conflict of interests [101] Mr GD became involved with the claim by [Company C] as a director of [Law Firm A] Trustees 14 Ltd, one of the trustees of the [Name] Trust. The firm held the proceeds of sale of the property in its Trust account and Mr CN had requested tha...

6. [2019] NZREADT 40 - Catley & Boyle - Ruling [pdf, 402 KB]

   ...Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act is very different from the procedure prescribed by the Real Estate Agents Act; in particular in that only the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal has jurisdiction to impose penalties (under s 101). Submissions for the Authority [32] Ms Mok submitted for the Authority that in s 111, the legislature proceeded on the assumption that a Complaints Assessment Committee’s determination of unsatisfactory conduct under s 89(2)(b) inclu...

7. MG v Jean Xiujing Hu [2019] NZIACDT 20 (10 April 2019) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...(4). 5 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Section 50 of the Act. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Section 53(1). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 1.5 Written agreements A licensed immigration adviser must ensure that: a) before any agreement is entered into, clients are made aware, in writing and in plain language, of the terms of the agreement and a...

8. INZ (Gilray) v Singh [2019] NZIACDT 53 (29 July 2019) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 Client Care 2. A licensed immigration adviser must: … e. obtain and carry out the informed lawful instructions of the client, and … Legislative requirements 3. A licensed immigration adviser m...

9. INZ (Calder) v Wong [2019] NZIACDT 44 (27 June 2019) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...49(3) & (4). 5 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Section 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Section 53(1). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 ASSESSMENT [65] In addition to the statutory ground of complaint as to dishonest or misleading behaviour, the Registrar relies on the following obligations in the Code: Legislative requirements 3. A li...

10. Joint Application to Make a New Parenting Order by Consent [pdf, 603 KB]

    ...Make a New Parenting Order by ConsentV1 July 2019 A P P LI C A TI O N Exhibits referred to on this page (by assigned letter e.g. “A”) Initials: [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128...