LCRO 78/2023 CQ v KV (20 May 2025) [pdf, 218 KB]
...borrowing had been reduced, which Ms HW would not have contributed to.27 [100] A discussion between Mr CQ and a lawyer instructed by Ms KV would likely have exposed the unfair nature of the proposed arrangement and provided some protection for her. [101] I agree with the Committee, when it describes Mr CQ’s failings as ‘serious’.28 26 Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Harper [2020] NZLCDT 29. 27 The amount of rental paid by Ms HW is unknown. 28 Standards Committee determi...