3376 items matching your search terms
JAN SUSAN BRACEWELL v RICHMOND SERVICES LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 111 [1 July 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 111 ARC 91/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JAN SUSAN BRACEWELL Plaintiff AND RICHMOND SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26 - 27 May 2014; and by documents filed on 3, 5, 6, 10 and 14 June 2014 Appearances:
NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC v AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 7 [11 February 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 7 EMPC 152/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for compliance orders BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC First Plaintiff AND THE PERSONS LISTED IN SCHEDULE A Second Plaintiffs AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant
...as alleged in the amended statement of claim we have applied the civil standard of proof (balance of probabilities) as explained by Blanchard, Tipping and McGrath JJ in Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [101] to [107]. Given the serious nature of the allegations, made against Mr Emms and the equally serious consequences of upholding the Director’s complaints we have required a high degree of cogency before accepting any of the evidence called...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2011-100-000083 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 36 BETWEEN NICHOLA JOAN TURNER AND TRACEY ANN MACLEOD Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND NICOLA TRESSIDER Second Respondent AND SIMON GUINNESS Third Respondent AND CAPSTONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND RICHARD DONALDSON Fifth Respondent AND BARFOOT AND THOMPSON LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND NORMAN LLOYD (R
...the Crown venture into the more acute issue of whether “the former owners or their descendants” meant their “successors” or “descendants”. The Crown did not turn its mind to the distinction at the time. [65] Mr Catran (paragraphs 101 and 102) also referred to paragraphs 37 to 41 of Judge Milroy’s decision and argued: Mr Bollmann’s letter to the Treaty Unit sets out Mr Wood’s opposition to successions (para 37). Mr Bollmann stated his own opposition to that approa...
...respondents to the resulting damage. [61] The claim for damage arising from defective installation of the flashing to cladding junction therefore fails. 32 At 110. 33 At 101. Page | 24 Summary of defects [62] The claimant has proved that the following defects caused weathertightness issues: a) The incompatible expansion rates between the timber framing and the Harditex cladding; b) T...
Our performance Statement of responsibility I am responsible, as Secretary for Justice and Chief Executive of the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), for: • the preparation of the Ministry’s financial statements, and statements of expenses and capital expenditure, and for the judgements expressed in them • having in place a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial reporting • ensuring that end-of-yea
60 Tākitimu MB 7 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20150004913 A20150003172 A20140012724 UNDER Section 67, 315 and 326(b), Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rotopounamu 1B1A BETWEEN GARY HUATA, BRENDA NICOLE KUPA, PATON LUXFORD, DAVID WHATANUI PUNA, TE ROERA CLIVE DAVID PUNA AND JEAN YORSTEN AS TRUSTEES OF ROTOPOUNAMU 1B1A AHU WHENUA TRUST AND PETER ROBIN, RAYMOND PUNA, NI
...partition .............................................................................................................. [100] Pakohu 2B2AJ partition .................................................................................................... [101] Muriwhenua Incorporation share register ........................................................................ [102] Parengarenga B3 Residue title ..........................................................................................
2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1457 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20180004493 CJ 2018/42 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF CJ 2018/42 Roera Rangi or Rangi Roera or Roera Te Heke-tanga - and succession orders made at 10 Taranaki MB 174 (13/06/1904), 10 Taranaki MB 138 (12/10/1906) and Wellington Appellate MB no 1 p.133 (18/06/1907) - Application to the Chief Judge BETWEEN RIPEKA