Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 205 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 15 MB]

   ...stated ... ..... 100 Variance and inconsistency in landscape descriptors ....... ..... .. ......... .. ................ .. .. 100 Evaluation of Policy 6.3.2.4 ....... .. ........ ....... ...................... .............................. ... ... .. 101 Evaluation of Policy 6.3.2.7 ................... .. ... .. ... ...... ............. ................... .... ........... .. 101 6.3.3 Policies on managing activities on ONFs and in ONLs ............................. 103 Evaluation of Poli...

2. Final-Technical-Assessment-D-Landscape-Visual-and-Natural-Character-v2.pdf [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ............................................................................................................. 100  CONCLUSION ..................................................................................................... 100  APPENDIX D.1: METHODOLOGY ...................................................................... 101  Methodological framework ................................................................................ 101  Landscape and Visual ................................

3. Tupe Snr v Everton - Manunui No 1 4th Residue Ahu Whenua Trust (2015) 334 Aotea MB 227 (334 AOT 227) [pdf, 330 KB]

   .................................................................................................. [99] Submissions for Messrs Tupe (Snr), Tupe and Pahi ........................................................ [99] Submissions for Mr Everton ............................................................................................ [101] The Law ....................................................................................................................................... [10...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 111 Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd [pdf, 300 KB]

   JAN SUSAN BRACEWELL v RICHMOND SERVICES LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 111 [1 July 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 111 ARC 91/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JAN SUSAN BRACEWELL Plaintiff AND RICHMOND SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26 - 27 May 2014; and by documents filed on 3, 5, 6, 10 and 14 June 2014 Appearances:

5. [2016] NZEmpC 7 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 372 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC v AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 7 [11 February 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 7 EMPC 152/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for compliance orders BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS & RELATED TRADES UNION INC First Plaintiff AND THE PERSONS LISTED IN SCHEDULE A Second Plaintiffs AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant

6. Director of Proceedings v Emms [2013] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...as alleged in the amended statement of claim we have applied the civil standard of proof (balance of probabilities) as explained by Blanchard, Tipping and McGrath JJ in Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [101] to [107]. Given the serious nature of the allegations, made against Mr Emms and the equally serious consequences of upholding the Director’s complaints we have required a high degree of cogency before accepting any of the evidence called...

7. Turner v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 36 [pdf, 327 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2011-100-000083 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 36 BETWEEN NICHOLA JOAN TURNER AND TRACEY ANN MACLEOD Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND NICOLA TRESSIDER Second Respondent AND SIMON GUINNESS Third Respondent AND CAPSTONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND RICHARD DONALDSON Fifth Respondent AND BARFOOT AND THOMPSON LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND NORMAN LLOYD (R

8. Ruapuha and Uekaha Hapu Trust v Tane - Hauturu East 8 Block [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 512 (2010 APPEAL 512) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...the Crown venture into the more acute issue of whether “the former owners or their descendants” meant their “successors” or “descendants”. The Crown did not turn its mind to the distinction at the time. [65] Mr Catran (paragraphs 101 and 102) also referred to paragraphs 37 to 41 of Judge Milroy’s decision and argued: Mr Bollmann’s letter to the Treaty Unit sets out Mr Wood’s opposition to successions (para 37). Mr Bollmann stated his own opposition to that approa...

9. Clearwater Cove Apartments Body Corporate 170989 v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 39 [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...respondents to the resulting damage. [61] The claim for damage arising from defective installation of the flashing to cladding junction therefore fails. 32 At 110. 33 At 101. Page | 24 Summary of defects [62] The claimant has proved that the following defects caused weathertightness issues: a) The incompatible expansion rates between the timber framing and the Harditex cladding; b) T...

10. 2015 Ministry of Justice annual report - our performance [pdf, 509 KB]

    Our performance Statement of responsibility I am responsible, as Secretary for Justice and Chief Executive of the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry), for: • the preparation of the Ministry’s financial statements, and statements of expenses and capital expenditure, and for the judgements expressed in them • having in place a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial reporting • ensuring that end-of-yea