Search Results

1. ENVC paper Guizhou Province Judges 2015 [pdf, 337 KB]

   ...management field, and whose Commissioners were professionals in their own fields like engineering, planning, ecology, economics and the like. Specialisation is important for good environmental regulation and for advancement of knowledge about it. [101] Also of importance for our system is having (hopefully) clear laws in legislation and in the national, regional and district planning instruments. The Court has also set up detailed rules about its procedures, published in its Practic...

2. Rogers v Hauraki – Te Aute A1B (2015) 117 Taitokerau MB 87 (117 TTK 87) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...to carry out works necessary to construct and maintain the roadway as it traverses Te Aute A1B, but he is not entitled to excavate metal on Te Aute A1B, whether to use on the roadway or elsewhere. I do not sense that he has 117 Taitokerau MB 101 gone beyond his legal rights in that regard, save for the issues to do with the bridge structures. [44] As for the streambed, I find that Arthur has undertaken work that has disturbed the streambed. But it is not clear from the e...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 144 Nash v NZ Trade & Enterprise and Wellington Regional Chamber of Commerce [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...Society Inc [2011] NZERA Wellington 12. 2 Nash v Wellington Regional Chamber of Commerce [2013] NZERA Wellington 31 [Authority strike-out determination] at [11]. 3 At [8]. 4 At [10]. 5 Nash v New Zealand Trade and Enterprise [2013] NZEmpC 101 at [15]. said, as Mr Nash claimed, that NZTE had been a joint employer with WRCC at the material time. 6 [5] Following delivery of my judgment, the matter was referred back to the Authority. In a further determination dated...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 99 Robinson v Pacific Seals Ltd [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...the building, drove through the glass frontage, through a counter and a partition wall and finally came to rest at a concrete wall near 1 Robinson v Pacific Seals (NZ) Ltd [2013] NZERA Wellington 101 [Authority determination]. 2 At [86]. 3 Robinson v Pacific Seals New Zealand Ltd WRC20/13, 6 December 2013. Mr Robinson’s desk. He sustained significant injuries to his legs as a result of the accident. The motorist also s...

5. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC revised evidence chief Shumane tracked [pdf, 403 KB]

   ...large scale upgrades in this area, but suggests that changes to management regimes may be considered as an option. This could mean further restrictions on general traffic to accommodate more buses and taxis. Page 19 31551164:629148 101. I completed a scoping analysis of the road outside the ferry terminal and concluded that the restricted area can be extended eastwards by 80-90 metres to double the parking supply available to buses and taxis. 102. Upgrades that includ...

6. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC revised evidence chief Shumane final [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...potential difficulties in carrying out large scale upgrades in this area, but suggests that changes to management regimes may be considered as an option. This could mean further restrictions on general traffic to accommodate more buses and taxis. 101. I completed a scoping analysis of the road outside the ferry terminal and concluded that the restricted area can be extended eastwards by 80-90 metres to double the parking supply available to buses and taxis. Page 19 3155...

7. McLelland - Ngati Hine H2B (2011) 21 Taitokerau MB 57 (21 TTK 57) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...administrators than one of any part of the estate that part shall vest in them as joint tenants. [37] Under s 24(1), the estate is deemed to vest in the administrators as from the date of the death of the deceased person. However, pursuant to s 101 of the Act, the 1969 Act and other legislation related to estates must be read subject to Part 4 of the Act. In our view, s 24(1) of the 1969 Act must be read subject to s 112 of the Act with the consequence that interests in Māori fre...

8. Nicholls v Nicholls – W T Nicholls Trust (2013) 55 Waikato Maniapoto MB 288 (55 WMN 288) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...Appellate Court pursuant to r 12(3) of the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005. The application for a stay was made in relation to two decisions: the decision of the Māori Appellate Court dated 23 February 2011 at 2011 Māori Appellate Court MB 86-101; and the interim injunction order of the Māori Land Court dated 19 August 2011 at 26 Taitokerau MB 267-269. The application requested the above orders be stayed pending the outcome of an appeal to the Court of Appeal....

9. CAC 10026 v Dodd [2011] NZREADT 1 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...AP130/96 6 September 1996 at 12. [99] In doing so the Tribunal has considered the past cases decided by the Licensing Board and referred to by Allan J. [100] The defendant‘s financial circumstances make the imposition of a fine inappropriate. [101] The Tribunal is satisfied that the defendant‘s conduct is a serious breach of s 73(a) particularly if one has regard to s256 of the Crimes Act and the maximum sentences contained therein. [102] The Tribunal is satisfied that the...

10. Reid v Fire Services and Crown Law (Recall Application) [2012] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 95 KB]

    ...that could have been exercised by the Tribunal. See s 129(6)(b) of the Human Rights Act. In certain circumstances the Judge of the High Court is required to sit with additional members of the High Court appointed from the Panel maintained under s 101 of the Act. See s 126(1). A party dissatisfied with the decision of the High Court may, with leave of the High Court, appeal to the Court of Appeal on a question of law. If leave is refused, special leave can be sought directly from the...