Search Results

Search results for 101.

3376 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 63/2024 WL v AC and TU (25 November 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...the financial outcomes sought by the applicant in the complaint that led to that separate review application. My comment was that his proper remedy was to apply to the Family Court for a costs order against the other party in the proceedings. [101] I did not mean to suggest that the applicant “should” have made such a costs order application, which is how the applicant appears to have interpreted my comment. Further, I did not mean to express any view that the applicant might have...

  2. LCRO 76/2024 QM v BY (13 December 2024) [pdf, 240 KB]

    ...Adding the following words (or similar) after the suggestion to a complainant to contact the Complaints Service, could suffice: “A Standards Committee may require further information from you before it can consider invoices in this category.” [101] In the present case, it is clear that QM was complaining about BY’s fees, yet she did not attach any invoice despite the form recommending complainants to do so. [102] I appreciate that there is a point at which complainants must take re...

  3. 2013 Ministry of Justice Annual Report [pdf, 2.6 MB]

    Annual Report 1 July 2012–30 June 2013 E.64 (2013) http://www.justice.govt.nz/ http://www.justice.govt.nz/ Table of contents 2012/13 Highlights 2 Chief Executive’s report 4 What we do 6 The Ministry of Justice 6 Sector leadership 7 Our focus 11 What we have achieved 12 Building a customer focused Ministry 12 Making communities safer 17 Maintaining the integrity and improving the responsiveness of the justice system 22 Maintaining the civil and democratic rights of New

  4. Willowridge Developments Ltd & Remarkables Park Ltd - Claire Hunter - EIC - 25 February 2022 [pdf, 11 MB]

    Solicitor acting G M Todd / B B Gresson PO Box 124 Queenstown 9348 P: 03 441 2743 graeme@toddandwalker.com ben@toddandwalker.com Counsel instructed B J Matheson Richmond Chambers 33 Shortland Street Auckland 1140 matheson@richmondchambers.co.nz IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-128 I TE KŌTI TAIAO KI ŌTAUTAHI UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) of the Act

  5. Evaluation of the Te Hurihanga pilot [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...abuse 92 5.3.4 Peer relations 93 5.3.5 Leisure and recreation 94 5.3.6 Personality and behaviour 96 5.3.7 Attitude and orientation 98 5.3.8 Cultural outcomes 99 5.3.9 Identity development 100 5.3.10 Mental health/safety and physical health 101 5.3.11 Life skills 102 5.3.12 Summary 102 Te Hurihanga Pilot: Evaluation Report 7 Centre for Research, Evaluation and Social Assessment (CRESA) Ltd 5.4 Ultimate outcomes – offending frequency and severity 103 5.4.1 Preintake...

  6. Waitangi Tribunal theme Q - Inland waterways - lakes [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...The Rotorua fisheries and other resources 91; The nature and extent of Maori rights in the Rotorua lakes 93; Early Pakeha visitors to the district 97; The Thermal Springs District Act 1881 98; The status of lands abutting the Rotorua lakes around 1918 101; Challenges to Te Arawa’s rights and authority in respect of the lakes 103; Te Arawa apply to the Native Land Court 107; 1918 Native Land Court inquiry 112; Negotiations for settlement 117; The Native Land Amendment and Native Land Claims Ad...

  8. Māori Appellate Court judgments subject index [pdf, 330 KB]

    ...land to General land to facilitate sale of parts of the block. Partially allowed. Effecitive management and utilisation, PCAs right CJ Williams, DCJ Isaac, J Harvey 26.10.2006 De Loree v Mokomoko - Hiwarau C 11 Waiariki Appellate MB 101 11 AP 101 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 section 58, 40(1)(b), 98(9)(a), Administration of Trust. Issues raised include: money lost on logging contract, ownership of house on the block, failure to provide audited accounts, adminis...

  9. Chapman v Aotearoa Resorts Ltd - Tokaanu Māori Township 2nd Residue Trust (2010) 257 Aotea MB 62 (257 AOT 62) [pdf, 245 KB]

    CHAPMAN V AOTEAROA RESORT LIMITED MLC A20080018680 4 October 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 257 AOTEA MB 62 (257 AOT 62) A20080018680 UNDER Sections 19 and 21 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tokaanu Maori Township 2nd Residue Trust BETWEEN DICKSON ELLIS CHAPMAN, HOKOWHITUATU DUNCAN CORMAC MCKENZIE, MARTIN (MARTENE) BIDDLE, VERA TEIWERA COOK AND WIREMU TEKEREHI JOHN MARIU Applicants AND AOTEAROA RESORTS LIMITED F

  10. [2018] NZEnvC 015 Mawhinney v Auckland Council [pdf, 21 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MAHER BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018) NZEnvC 15 of an application pursuant to section 311 of the Resource Management Act 1991 PETER WILLIAM MAWHINNEY (AS TRUSTEE OF WAITAKERE FOREST LAND TRUST AND OF THE FOREST TRUST) (ENV-2017 -AKL-000090) Applicants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson (Sitting alone under section 279 of the Act) Hearing : at Auckland on 19 October 2