Search Results

Search results for 101.

3476 items matching your search terms

  1. OWRUG - EiC - M A Hickey - Geogrpahy/Hydrology (4 Feb 2021) [pdf, 698 KB]

    BI-1035600-2-287-V4 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV:2020-CHC-127 In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago. Between OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant And OTAGO WATER RESOURCES USER GROUP Section 274 Party EVIDENCE OF MATTHEW AARON HICKEY FOR OTAGO WATER RESOURCES USER GROUP GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN LAWYE

  2. [2020] NZEnvC 155 Wilkins Farming Co Ltd v Southland Regional Council.pdf [pdf, 6.9 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl OTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 155 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under section 120 of the Act WILKINS FARMING CO LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-380) Appellant SOUTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner M C G Mabin Environment Commissioner A P Gysberts Hearing: at lnvercargill on

  3. INZ (Calder) v Tian [2019] NZIACDT 48 (19 July 2019) [pdf, 387 KB]

    ...months or more. It had become a case of whether the assessing officer “liked you or not”. There was a fine line between discretionary judgement and corruption in terms of inconsistent outcomes being delivered on the whim of an officer. [101] It was asserted by Ms Tian in the letter that the objective of the complaint was personal and revenge motivated. It sought to blame her for poorly worded instructions. It had been manufactured in a desperate attempt by two managers to...

  4. [2019] NZEnvC 125 Schmuck v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.7 MB]

    ...held valid resource consents providing for boatyard activities on his land, the adjacent esplanade reserve and the CMA, together with rights for discharges to air, land and the CMA. (footnote: See for instance, Schmuck v FNDC and NRG [2014] NZEnvC 101, where Judge Kirkpatrick held that the consent authorising use of the reserve for boatyard activities was valid and had been given effect to. His Honour also was at pains to explain why the paragraph in the Memorandum requiring the Min...

  5. Marshall v IDEA Services Ltd (HDC Act) [2020] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 434 KB]

    ...Dignity in the UDHR, ICCPR and ICESCR [73] Dignity in the context of the HDCA, Human Rights Act and Privacy Act [88] Dignity and the tort of misuse of private information [93] The assessment of loss of dignity – whether subjective or objective [101] The basis on which damages for loss of dignity are to be assessed [103] The positions taken by the parties [108] THE ASSESSMENT OF QUANTUM [111] The tort analogy [111] Application to Tribunal’s jurisdiction [114] The importance of the...

  6. [2021] NZEnvC 175 Shaw v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    1 SHAW v HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 175 IN THE MATTER of objections under Section 23 of the Public Works Act 1981 BETWEEN MURRAY NELSON SHAW AND MARGARET EVELYN SHAW (ENV-2019-AKL-000316) Objectors AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey Commissioner J A Hodges Commissioner R M Bartlett Hearing: at

  7. [2024] NZEmpC 123 Wiles v University of Auckland [pdf, 536 KB]

    SIOUXSIE WILES v THE VICE-CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND [2024] NZEmpC 123 [8 July 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 123 EMPC 477/2021 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SIOUXSIE WILES Plaintiff AND THE VICE-CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND Defendant Hearing: 6-24, 28

  8. [2023] NZEmpC 168 AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 545 KB]

    ...being moved from Prosecutions? [100] The central issue arising from AJY’s removal from Prosecutions to the Gatehouse is whether they were sufficiently consulted, if at all, before the decision was made to shift them out of Prosecutions. [101] Mr Tukula accepts that he made the decision to move AJY on or about 1 November 2017, if not before.8 He says that was because he was concerned for their health and wellbeing if they stayed. He did not meet or discuss the situation with t...

  9. Ngati Pahauwera Crown Summary Report November 2014 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    .............................................................................................................................. 99 Appendix I ................................................................................................................................................ 101 Research Process/ Sources Consulted: ................................................................................................ 101 Master Document List ..................................................

  10. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 2 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 12 MB]

    t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 2 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo