Search Results

1. Provider manual: 1b temporary approvals operational policy [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...temporary approval will expire once a decision is made by the Secretary on their application for full approval. The Secretary can cancel or modify a temporary approval, or impose interim restrictions, in the same way as a full approval (see sections 101 – 103 of the Act). If the Secretary declines an application for full approval, with the consequence that the provider’s temporary approval also expires, the provider may apply to the Secretary for a limited approval to allow the provi...

2. The Māori Trustee v Smith - Waipaoa 5A2 (2017) 65 Tairawhiti MB 215 (65 TRW 215) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...38-52 (63 TRW 38). 3 64 Tairāwhiti MB 30-31 (64 TRW 30). 4 65 Tairāwhiti MB 81-87 (64 TRW 81). 5 65 Tairāwhiti MB 170-172 (65 TRW 170). 6 As to jurisdiction see Taueki – Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Māori Reservation Trust (2012) 279 Aotea MB 101 (279 AOT 101); Nicholls v Nicholls – W T Nicholls Trust (2013) 55 Waikato Maniapoto MB 288 (55 WMN 288); Tahere v Trustees of Rangihamana X3A – Rangihamama X3A and Omapere Taraire E (2015) 118 Taitokerau MB 194 (118 TTK 194). As to...

3. Government Response to Law Commission report on the Review of the Privacy Act 1993 [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...this response as it is not a recommendation to the Government); two recommendations are contained in Invasion of Privacy: Penalties and Remedies (NZLC 113) (Recommendations 18 and 19); and one recommendation is contained in Public Registers (NZLC 101) (Recommendation 7). 4 Recommendation 1 5 Recommendation 2 http://www.justice.govt.nz/publications/global-publications/g/government-response-to-law-commission-report-invasion-of-privacy-penalties-and-remedies http://www.justice.govt.nz/...

4. Pere - Matauri X Incorporation (2004) 101 Whangārei MB 73 (101 WH 73) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   «)/,..,vte &::ok' : A2QO.lOO01561 .docJ l IO/IUH 70-7"7 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT TAITOKERAU DISTIUCT ~, IN TIlE MA TIER of applications by MANUKA PERE Pursuant to s.18(1)(a) & s.19( I )(b) Te Ture When"a Maori Act 1993 & IN THE MATfER of a li cence to occupy granted to BEN PAPA PERE by the MATAURl X INCORPORA TfON on 7 June t 994 DECISION These applications were heard on 25 June 2004 and adjourned to Chambers for submissions to be filed by the parti

5. Peihopa v Peihopa - Kaikou H (2021) 227 Taitokerau MB 247 (227 TTK 247) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...See Hoete v Faulkner - Motiti North C No 1 Block (2017) 140 Waikato Maniapoto MB 1 (140 WMN 1); Nicholls v Nicholls – W T Nicholls Trust (2013) 55 Waikato Maniapoto MB 288 (55 WMN 288), Tukapua v Taueki – Horowhenua 11 (2012) 279 Aotea MB 101 (279 AOT 101) and Nicholls v Nicholls – Part Papaaroha 6B [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 515 (2013 APPEAL 515). 2 Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bilgola Enterprises Ltd [1999] CA69/99 (CA) at [9]. 227 Taitokerau MB 250...

6. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bill [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...recklessly fail to comply with a notice to supply information or data. We consider this power constitutes a search for the purpose of s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. 1 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 10. Ordinarily, a provision found to limit a particular right or freedom may nevertheless be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act if it can be considered reasonably justified in t...

7. Moses-Heeney - Estate of Eric Moses (2018) 201 Waiariki MB 122 (201 WAR 122) [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...Karauti – Succession to George or Hori Kiwa Tukua (2000) 116 Otorohanga MB 81 (116 OT 81); Milner v Milner – Succession to Warihi Te Keu Faenza Milner (2008) 83 Ruatoria MB 108 (83 RUA 108); Bennett – Succession to Ronald Clifford Bennett (2014) 101 Waiariki MB 290 (101 WAR 290); Koia – Succession to Hoani Tau Takahi (2015) 133 Waiariki MB 273 (133 WAR 273) http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0004/latest/link.aspx?search=sw_096be8ed8170b93d_115_25_se&p=1&id=DL...

8. 20230328-Integrity-Sport-and-Recreation-Bill.pdf [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...search does not authorise searches that would be unreasonable and thus, infringe protected rights.7 Therefore, testing and monitoring will need to be undertaken in a manner that is compliant with s 21. 3 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 4 Ibid at [162] per Blanchard J. 5 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [172] per Blanchard J. 6 Drew v Attorney General [2002] 1 NZLR 58 (CA). 7 Cropp v Judicial Committee [...

9. 20241211 Local Government Water Services Bill [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act if it can be considered reasonably justified in terms of s 5 of that Act. However, the Supreme Court has held that an unreasonable search logically cannot 3 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 4 New Zealand Stock Exchange v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [1992] 3 NZLR 1 (PCP). 5 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [172] per Blanchard J. be demonstrably justified and ther...

10. People charged and convicted of driving under the influence offences June 2018 [xlsx, 853 KB]

    ...Waikato Te Awamutu Convicted 197 162 148 136 93 97 58 62 86 91 Waikato Te Awamutu Other proved 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 Waikato Te Awamutu Not proved 8 11 14 4 3 4 1 6 2 4 Waikato Te Awamutu Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Awamutu Total 206 174 164 141 97 101 59 68 89 95 Waikato Te Kuiti Convicted 128 122 112 112 87 78 95 55 71 62 Waikato Te Kuiti Other proved 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Waikato Te Kuiti Not proved 8 8 5 6 3 1 2 4 3 2 Waikato Te Kuiti Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Kuit...