OX v XX Standards Committee LCRO 180/2015 (4 October 2016) [pdf, 456 KB]
...OX, it is more likely than not that the deficiencies in Mr OX’s conduct of the aborted jury trial 23 collectively, fell below the standard of professionalism that would be regarded by lawyers of good standing as being acceptable. [101] It is particularly important where an accused’s liberty is at risk that minimum standards are met and preferably exceeded. Only lawyers have the status to appear as an advocate for any other person before a New Zealand court. That work...