Search Results

Search results for 101.

3434 items matching your search terms

  1. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bill [pdf, 137 KB]

    ...recklessly fail to comply with a notice to supply information or data. We consider this power constitutes a search for the purpose of s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. 1 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 10. Ordinarily, a provision found to limit a particular right or freedom may nevertheless be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act if it can be considered reasonably justified in t...

  2. Moses-Heeney - Estate of Eric Moses (2018) 201 Waiariki MB 122 (201 WAR 122) [pdf, 282 KB]

    ...Karauti – Succession to George or Hori Kiwa Tukua (2000) 116 Otorohanga MB 81 (116 OT 81); Milner v Milner – Succession to Warihi Te Keu Faenza Milner (2008) 83 Ruatoria MB 108 (83 RUA 108); Bennett – Succession to Ronald Clifford Bennett (2014) 101 Waiariki MB 290 (101 WAR 290); Koia – Succession to Hoani Tau Takahi (2015) 133 Waiariki MB 273 (133 WAR 273) http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0004/latest/link.aspx?search=sw_096be8ed8170b93d_115_25_se&p=1&id=DL...

  3. 20230328-Integrity-Sport-and-Recreation-Bill.pdf [pdf, 143 KB]

    ...search does not authorise searches that would be unreasonable and thus, infringe protected rights.7 Therefore, testing and monitoring will need to be undertaken in a manner that is compliant with s 21. 3 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 4 Ibid at [162] per Blanchard J. 5 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [172] per Blanchard J. 6 Drew v Attorney General [2002] 1 NZLR 58 (CA). 7 Cropp v Judicial Committee [...

  4. 20241211 Local Government Water Services Bill [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act if it can be considered reasonably justified in terms of s 5 of that Act. However, the Supreme Court has held that an unreasonable search logically cannot 3 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 4 New Zealand Stock Exchange v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [1992] 3 NZLR 1 (PCP). 5 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [172] per Blanchard J. be demonstrably justified and ther...

  5. People charged and convicted of driving under the influence offences June 2018 [xlsx, 853 KB]

    ...Waikato Te Awamutu Convicted 197 162 148 136 93 97 58 62 86 91 Waikato Te Awamutu Other proved 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 Waikato Te Awamutu Not proved 8 11 14 4 3 4 1 6 2 4 Waikato Te Awamutu Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Awamutu Total 206 174 164 141 97 101 59 68 89 95 Waikato Te Kuiti Convicted 128 122 112 112 87 78 95 55 71 62 Waikato Te Kuiti Other proved 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Waikato Te Kuiti Not proved 8 8 5 6 3 1 2 4 3 2 Waikato Te Kuiti Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Kuit...

  6. People with finalised charges and convicted of drug offences June 2023 [xlsx, 271 KB]

    ...proved 24 12 0 29 23 39 55 48 40 41 32% 36% 0% 41% 27% 46% 45% 43% 37% 38% Cocaine Other 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Cocaine Total 74 33 16 70 84 85 123 112 108 107 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Ecstasy Convicted 104 93 97 65 84 101 154 230 170 232 30% 60% 59% 45% 54% 54% 51% 53% 55% 54% Ecstasy Other proved 4 6 3 11 9 17 32 56 11 25 1% 4% 2% 8% 6% 9% 11% 13% 4% 6% Ecstasy Not proved 233 54 65 69 58 68 115 150 126 168 68% 35% 39% 48% 37% 37% 38% 34...

  7. People with finalised charges and convicted of drug offences jun2024 [xlsx, 268 KB]

    ...proved 12 0 29 23 39 55 48 40 41 254 36% 0% 41% 27% 46% 45% 43% 37% 38% 67% Cocaine Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Cocaine Total 33 16 70 84 85 123 112 108 109 378 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Ecstasy Convicted 93 97 65 84 101 154 230 170 224 201 60% 59% 45% 54% 54% 51% 53% 55% 52% 46% Ecstasy Other proved 6 3 11 9 17 32 56 11 25 23 4% 2% 8% 6% 9% 11% 13% 4% 6% 5% Ecstasy Not proved 54 65 69 58 68 115 150 126 179 213 35% 39% 48% 37% 37% 38% 34%...

  8. FT v NSC LCRO 261 / 2010 (21 October 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...inquiring. [37] This question was addressed in Auckland District Law Society v The New Zealand Law Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal and O HC Auckland, HC 237/94 and in 84/94, 27 April 1995, which considered the similar requirements of section 101(3)(a) of the Law Practitioners Act 1982. [38] In its decision, the Court criticised the Law Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal for paraphrasing words used in the Act. In its decision, the Tribunal had cited a passage from H (a law...

  9. [2021] NZACC 146 – Buis v ACC (28 September 2021) [pdf, 248 KB]

    ...effect to the extent that it requires payment of interest only in respect of calculations made under that Act for any period commencing on or after 1 July 1992 for which weekly compensation is payable. (2) Despite section 339, - (a) section 101 of the Accident Insurance Act 1998 continues in effect as if that section had not been repealed; but (b) section 101 has effect to require the payment of interest only in respect of calculations made under that Act for the period 1...

  10. Name suppression jun2024 [xlsx, 135 KB]

    ...Court 8,389 8,562 9,231 8,441 7,160 7,389 7,559 6,848 8,881 11,834 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% No name suppression 203,835 204,817 210,779 206,592 200,287 190,725 198,161 154,842 175,189 195,755 93% 93% 93% 93% 94% 93% 93% 92% 91% 90% Total charges 218,169 220,187 225,926 221,760 212,877 204,578 212,101 168,204 192,287 216,884 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1b.Charges by outcome Table 1b: Number and percentage of finalised charges where name suppression was granted, by...