Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 027 Kumeu Property Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 17 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 27 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN KUMEU PROPERTY LIMITED (ENV-2017-AKL-44) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge JA Smith Environment Commissioner SK Prime Hearing: Auckland, 12-16 February 2018, site visit 21 February Appearances: RE Bartlett QC for Kumeu Property Limited (the Appl

2. Jones v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACA 02 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...and court proceedings, nor from instructing lawyers during that period of 20 years. [100] The responsibility for the delay in pursuing an appeal lies overwhelmingly with Mr Jones. The strength or merits of the applicant’s underlying case [101] This is regarded as the most important factor in assessing whether to grant an extension of time. [102] The claim for ERC is made under sections 59 and 60 of the 1982 Act. Mr Jones bears the burden of proving that “as a result of i...

3. McDonald v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACA 14 [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...Corporation. Section 93(2) sets out the details required to be given: (2) Every such notice shall be given in writing, and shall state the nature and cause of the injury and the date, time and place at which the accident happened … 21 [101] The particulars given on the claim form of 18 September 1992 identified the amputation surgery of March 1979 as the accident, as a bone spike had been left on the stump causing continuing pain. Over many years, this was the subject o...

4. Manuirirangi v Nga Hapu o Nga Ruahine Iwi Inc (2010) 2010 Chief Judge's MB 355 (2010 CJ 355) [pdf, 278 KB]

   HORI MANUIRIRANGI AND RATA PUE V NGA HAPU O NGA RUAHINE IWI INC MLC 2010 Chief Judge's MB 355 [8 December 2010] IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 2010 Chief Judge's MB 355 (2010 CJ 355) A20100007368 A20100010143 UNDER Section 30(1)(b), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Applications to determine the appropriate representatives for Nga Ruahine BETWEEN HORI MANUIRIRANGI AND RATA PUE First Applicants AND

5. When somebody dies suddenly - Samoan [pdf, 865 KB]

   ...455 (24 hours) info@sids.org.nz sids.org.nz Skylight Fesoasoani i taimi faigata mo fanau ma aiga 0800 299 100 skylight.org.nz Fesoasoani tau tupe ACC Fesoasoani pe afai na maliu se tasi o le aiga i se faalavelave faafuasei 0800 101 996 acc.govt.nz Work and Income mo se seleni e totogi ai le tapenaga o le maliu poo isi fesoasoani tau tupe (e fuafua i le tupe maua) 0800 559 009 winz.govt.nz Fesoasoani faatino Pe a fia maua se fale maliu e lata ane ia te oe, s...

6. When somebody dies suddenly - Tongan [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...Skylight Poupou mo e tokoni ‘i ha taimi faingata’a’ia ‘a e fāmili mo e fānau. Telefoni 0800 299 100 skylight.org.nz Tokoni fakapa’anga ACC Tokoni kapau ‘e mole e mo’ui ‘a ha taha ‘i ha fakatu'utāmaki. 0800 101 996 acc.govt.nz Work and Income Ke ma’u ha tokoni fakapa’anga ke tokoni ki he fakamole ‘o e putu mo ha ngaahi me’a kehe pe. ‘E fiema’u ke ‘ilo ‘a e lahi ‘a ho vāhenga pe pa’anga hū mai. (income tested) 0800 559...

7. [2016] NZEmpC 97 Banks v Hockey Manawatu Inc [pdf, 193 KB]

   WARREN BANKS v HOCKEY MANAWATU INCORPORATED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 97 [5 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 97 EMPC 206/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN WARREN BANKS Plaintiff AND HOCKEY MANAWATU INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: (by a submissions-only telephone hearing on

8. Chen v Loh [2013] NZIACDT 15 (19 March 2013) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...New Zealand if Mr Loh wished to do so. [100] Mr Chen also indicated he had arranged for a translation of a recording of his meeting at Mr Loh and Ms Gu-Chang’s office; however it was not provided to the Tribunal. The Authority’s response [101] The Authority indicated that the information gathered regarding the level of fees charged by licensed immigration advisers was collated from a voluntary form completed on the renewal of licences. The Authority recognised that fees vary depe...

9. IR v ST LCRO 203 / 2010 (9 March 2012) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...agreed to be bound to this by his fax to [Mr SF] of 8 September 2008. The necessity for the arrangement was due to the appeal by Mr IR, which had not been heard at the time of the refinancing, and [Mr IR’]s wish not to sell the property”. [101] In his fax of 8 September 2008 Mr IR expressed unease about the provisions of the clause in the memorandum which provided that the transfer of the property was not to be taken as a complete transfer of Ms IS’s beneficial interest in...

10. QW v RH LCRO 166/2012 (18 October 2016) [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...not to order the trustees to make any disclosures to Mr QW was confirmed. [100] As mentioned above, the appeal to the Supreme Court was heard shortly before the review hearing in [Date], and no judgment had issued at the time of this review. [101] The extent to which the relevant law was traversed before the High Court and Court of Appeal supports the view that the position over disclosure to beneficiaries is not settled law. What can be said, however, is that questions of whether to...