Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 242 Tertiary Education Union v Te Pūkenga, New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology T/A Unitec [pdf, 381 KB]

   ...comply with its consultation obligations prior to removing the insurance benefits? Analysis [100] There are significant issues in relation to the way in which Te Pūkenga conducted the consultation process with the employees and the union. [101] Good faith in these circumstances required that Te Pūkenga genuinely consult with the employees and the union before making a decision to withdraw the insurance benefit. I did not understand it to be disputing this requirement. 1...

2. LCRO 47/2025 FI v SD (30 September 2025) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...further Family Court hearings regarding the parenting order at this stage”. [99] Mr FI spoke with Ms SD. [100] He remained insistent that his “reasons letter” be filed with the court as a separate document to the memorandum of counsel. [101] On Friday, 1 December 2024, Ms SD filed the memorandum of counsel seeking a final parenting order. A draft order was attached, together with Mr FI’s correspondence in which he provided explanation as to why contact with his daughter had...

3. RN v Accident Compensation Corporation (Cover and Entitlements) [2025] NZACC 140 (1 September 2025) [pdf, 378 KB]

   PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 140 ACAR 098/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN RN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION

4. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee 1 v Williams [2019] NZLCDT 33 [pdf, 317 KB]

   ...Mrs Z’s and or Mr and Mrs Z’s instructions is not consistent with the evidence that she was passive in the dealings nor that Mr Williams saw 19 Paragraph [5.8]. 20 Notes of Evidence p 101. 21 Notes of Evidence pp 71 and 72. 22 Paragraph [16] submissions in response. 15 his role solely as a “decision making trustee” not solicitor acting on instructions. (l) The clear distinction in roles that existed in th...

5. 2020 Cannabis Referendum Public Release 27 April 2021 [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   IN-CONFIDENCE 1 In Confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Chair, Cabinet Business Committee 2020 Cannabis referendum: Exposure draft Bill and Summary of policies for public release Proposal 1. The decision on whether or not to legalise and regulate cannabis for personal use is an important one that has implications for New Zealand as a society, and for our communities. The Government is committed to a well-informed cannabis referendum, to ensure a definitive r

6. Cabinet paper - Summary of policies Cabinet minutes - Exposure draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill [pdf, 6 MB]

   IN-CONFIDENCE 1 In Confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Chair, Cabinet Business Committee 2020 Cannabis referendum: Exposure draft Bill and Summary of policies for public release Proposal 1. The decision on whether or not to legalise and regulate cannabis for personal use is an important one that has implications for New Zealand as a society, and for our communities. The Government is committed to a well-informed cannabis referendum, to ensure a definitive r

7. March 2015 National Pānui [pdf, 319 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in MARCH | POUTÜ-TE-RANGI 2015: ISSN 1175 - 8120 www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz MARCH | POUTÜ-TE-RANGI 2015 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, please contact y

8. [2018] NZEnvC 163 Horowhenua District Council v Manawatu Whanganui Regional Council [pdf, 5.8 MB]

   1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Heard: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 163 of the Resource Management Act 1991 a direct referral under s 87G of the Act HOROWHENUA DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2016-WLG-000026) Applicant MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL and HOROWHENUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Consent authorities Environment Judge B P Dwyer Environment Commissioner J R Mills Environment

9. Regulatory Impact Statement: Including 17 year-olds, and convictable traffic offences not punishable by imprisonment, in the youth justice system [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   Regulatory Impact Statement Including 17 year-olds, and convictable traffic offences not punishable by imprisonment, in the youth justice system Agency Disclosure Statement 1. This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides three analyses. The first provides an analysis of options to include 17 year olds in the youth justice system. The second analyses options, in the context of a recommendation to include 17 year-olds in the youth

10. [2019] NZEnvC 206 Lake McKay Station Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 15 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 206 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act LAKE MCKAY STATION LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-160) HAWTHENDEN FARM LIMITED (ENV-2018-CHC-55) UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-56) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stag