Search Results

Search results for 101.

3476 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 95/2024 HC v RB (30 July 2025) [pdf, 428 KB]

    ...either under s 139(1) of the Trusts Act 2019 or under its inherent jurisdiction.27 The criteria for determining reasonable remuneration under s 139(2) of the Trusts Act 2019 are materially different from those under rr 9 – 9.2 of the Rules. [101] Similarly, the client care and service information prescribed in the preface to the Rules is of no application to a trustee, as a trustee does not have a client, and it is difficult to see how at least chapters 3–4, rr 5.3 and 5.6–5.12, c...

  2. MLC - National list of Māori land in New Zealand [xls, 4.8 MB]

    ...mlol@justice.govt.nz Māori Land DISTRICT BLOCKID BLOCK_NAME ALT_BLOCK_NAME STATUS AREA OWNERS LINZ_TITLE_REF AOT 17055 Section 2 Block III Huiroa Survey District (Maori Reserve) - Maori Customary Land Huiroa SD (Maori Reserve) Sec 2 Blk III Maori Customary Land 0.1011 0 AOT 17056 Te Apiti Urupa (Sec 7 Blk VI Huiroa SD) Maori Customary Land 0.4046 0 AOT 17968 Part Block IX Wairoa Survey District being Maori Reserve in Section 378 - Maori Customary Land Wairoa SD Maori Reserve Sec 378 Blk...

  3. Regulatory Impact Statement Considering changing the New Zealand flag [pdf, 8 MB]

    REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT: CONSIDERING CHANGING THE NEW ZEALAND FLAG Agency Disclosure Statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It analyses the implications of regulatory options for a referendum process to consider changing the New Zealand national flag . There will be a further RIS at a later point on the regulation of referendum advertising and any further detailed policy decisions with regulatory impacts relating to the flag pr

  4. Regulatory Impact Statement Vulnerable childrens bill child harm prevention orders [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...public. There are inherent limitations on what monitoring in the community, short of 24 hour surveillance, can achieve. The public might believe that an order would have a greater effect on child abuse that it would be capable of achieving. 101. Sixthly, there is a risk that the volume of applications would be substantial and encompass cases that were not sufficiently serious to justify the proposed order. 102. However, the following features of the regime would go some way towa...

  5. [2007] NZEmpC CC 5/07 Reynolds v Burgess [pdf, 116 KB]

    ...evidence [100] In addition to the aspects of the evidence to which Ms Reynolds referred me in her submissions, there were other particular aspects of the evidence I took into account in my assessment of credibility and in making findings of fact. [101] After moving to Christchurch, Ms Burgess and her husband were under some financial pressure. She needed to work. The job she had at Raeward Fresh had variable hours but was ongoing. It is most unlikely that she would have given up...

  6. [2007] NZEmpC AC 13/07 Red Beach School Board of Trustees & Ors v New Zealand Education Institute (Inc) [pdf, 135 KB]

    RED BEACH SCHOOL BOT & ANOR V NZEI (INC) AK AC 13/07 20 March 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 13/07 ARC 115/05 IN THE MATTER OF de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN THE RED BEACH SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES First Plaintiff AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL IN RESPECT OF THE SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION Second Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND EDUCATION INSTITUTE (INC) Defendant Hearing: 26, 27 and 29 J

  7. [2011] NZEmpC 152 Blackmore v Honick Properties Ltd [pdf, 178 KB]

    RICKY BLACKMORE V HONICK PROPERTIES LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 152 [24 November 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 152 ARC 37/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RICKY BLACKMORE Plaintiff AND HONICK PROPERTIES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 25 October 2011 (Heard at Hamilton) and by memoranda of submissions filed on 3 and 10 November 2011 Appearances: Gregor

  8. [2008] NZEmpC WC 13B/08 Mana Coach Services Ltd v NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Union Inc [pdf, 102 KB]

    MANA COACH SERVICES LTD V NZ TRAMWAYS & PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT UNION INC WN WC 13B/08 26 September 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 13B/08 WRC 4/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MANA COACH SERVICES LIMITED Plaintiff AND NZ TRAMWAYS AND PUBLIC PASSENGER TRANSPORT UNION INC Defendant Hearing: 30 June and 1, 2, 3 and 30 July 2008 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: Hugh Fu

  9. [2006] NZEmpC WC 10/06 Timmins v Asure New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

    TIMMINS V ASURE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED WN WC 10/06 29 June 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 10/06 WRC 16/05 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BENJAMIN HARRY TIMMINS Plaintiff AND ASURE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 December 2005 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: G A Paine and A Davison, Counsel for the Plaintiff J M Appleyard and V E Donaghy, Counsel for the Defendan

  10. [2013] NZEmpC 31 Turner v Talley’s Group Limited [pdf, 196 KB]

    LYNETTE TURNER V TALLEY'S GROUP LIMITED NZEmpC CHCH [2013] NZEmpC 31 [12 March 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 31 CRC 30/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LYNETTE TURNER Plaintiff AND TALLEY'S GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 11 and 12 February 2013 And by further written memoranda filed on 18 February and 1 March 2013 (Heard at Nelson) Appea