Search Results

1. September 2019 Outstanding Applications [pdf, 648 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

2. LCRO 133/2017 AD v BE (18 September 2019) [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...$110,000 by way of a personal bank cheque to [Mr GT] could be construed as intentionally obviating this obligation. [100] I am not entirely clear what Mr AD means. In any event, that appears to be the full extent of any written report to [EJP]. [101] It is woefully inadequate. [102] In his explanations to both the Committee and to this Office, Mr AD devotes considerable time to explaining how Mr BE had not properly sworn his affidavit and had not provided a complete set of docume...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 199 SKP Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.9 MB]

   ...The references in the Queenstown decision are to Shepherd v Environment Court (NZHC) Auckland CIV- 2011-404-3091, at paragraphs [36] and (37]. 5 lwi Trust and the Trust Board; because the latter are at the heart of the present allegations. [101 It will save many words if we here set out a chronology in summary form. The chronology is drawn largely from one proffered by counsel for KPBL at our hearing, which we have critically compared with all relevant evidence, and altered appr...

4. Proactive release - 2020 Cannabis Referendum [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   ...alternative way of accessing cannabis other than through a physical store, which may be preferable for people in rural and remote communities. Making cannabis products at home RE LE AS ED B Y TH E M IN IS TE R OF JU ST IC E 19 101. Government controlled and regulated production of the raw material means that cannabis-infused products could be permitted to be produced at home to provide people with access to alternative consumption methods. However, cannabis resin...

5. Wikiriwhi v Walters - Oruanui 9 Block and Part Oruanui 10 Block, Lot 1 Deposited Plan 471989 and Lot 2 Deposited Plan 471989 (2020) 232 Waiariki MB 212 (232 WAR 212) [pdf, 382 KB]

   232 Waiariki MB 212 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District A20160004830 WĀHANGA Under Sections 231, 238 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Oruanui 9 Block and Part Oruanui 10 Block, Lot 1 Deposited Plan 471989 and Lot 2 Deposited Plan 471989 (General lands) I WAENGA I A Between SUNNY WIKIRIWHI AND RENEE DES BARRES Ng

6. October 2019 Outstanding Applications [pdf, 659 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

7. Naera v Fenwick - Whakapoungakau 24 (2019) 217 Waiariki MB 85 (217 WAR 85) [pdf, 536 KB]

   ...Chambers, P O Box 10-201, Wellington 6143 felix.geiringer@terracechambers.co.nz M Kyriak, Kyriak Law, L4, 40 Eden Crescent, Auckland mtk@kyriaklaw.co.nz M McKechnie mmckechnie@xtra.co.nz D Chesterman Bankside Chambers, P O Box 2375, Auckland 1015 J Koning, Koning Webster Layers, P O Box 11120, Papamoa 3144 john@kwlaw.co.nz mailto:felix.geiringer@terracechambers.co.nz mailto:mtk@kyriaklaw.co.nz mailto:mmckechnie@xtra.co.nz mailto:john@kwlaw.co.nz 217 Waiāriki MB 86 TABLE OF CON...

8. Establishing a Criminal Cases Review Commission [pdf, 395 KB]

   ...case.23 Even if the court objects to a decision to not refer a case by the CCRC on the merits, they have tended to rule on whether the decision was legally tenable and, if not, that the CCRC should reconsider the case. Legal aid to be available 101 Legal aid is currently available for applications for the Royal prerogative of mercy and I see no reason why this should not continue for applications directed to the CCRC. The experience overseas and in New Zealand suggests that many applica...

9. Beauchamp v B & T Co (2011) Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...tables and chairs. Ms Du said she tried to look after her because she was pregnant and gave the example of asking Ms Rijal to do the dishes on Father’s Day instead of Ms Beauchamp because she wanted to make sure Ms Beauchamp had an easier job. [101] Ms Rijal said she had worked alongside Ms Beauchamp and Ms Du about a dozen times and it was clear they had a good relationship. Ms Rijal said from what she saw Ms Du treated Ms Beauchamp with the same respect and fairness she showed al...

10. LCRO 136/2021 YL v OB (28 February 2022) [pdf, 249 KB]

    ...standards of professionalism in the lawyer’s dealings. [100] I am not persuaded that Ms YL’s concerns regarding Mr OB’s general demeanour are sufficient to establish to the necessary threshold, that Mr OB had breached rules 3.1 or 10. [101] Attention then turns to the concerns Ms YL had regarding Mr OB’s comprehensive questioning of her in regard to the numerous emails her husband had forwarded to her in July and August 2020. [102] These emails focused almost exclusively...