Search Results

1. QW v RH LCRO 166/2012 (18 October 2016) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...not to order the trustees to make any disclosures to Mr QW was confirmed. [100] As mentioned above, the appeal to the Supreme Court was heard shortly before the review hearing in [Date], and no judgment had issued at the time of this review. [101] The extent to which the relevant law was traversed before the High Court and Court of Appeal supports the view that the position over disclosure to beneficiaries is not settled law. What can be said, however, is that questions of whether to...

2. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx Kuegler Family Trust & Others v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   0 Before the Environment Court ENV-2016-AKL- In the Matter of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) And In the Matter of an appeal under section 156 of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (the Unitary Plan) And In the Matter of Proposed Plan Hearing To

3. Pullar - Aperahama Sullivan whānau Trust (2017) 61 Takitimu MB 45 (61 TKT 45) [pdf, 439 KB]

   61 Tākitimu MB 45 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TᾹKITIMU DISTRICT A20140012747 UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Aperahama Sullivan Whānau Trust LOVIE HINERAUMOA PULLAR Applicant A20150001324 UNDER Section 244, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 APREAHAMA

4. Cooper v Standards Committee LCRO 280/2013, 281/2013, 324/2013, 325/2013, 34/2014, 118/2014 (17 April 2015) [pdf, 406 KB]

   ...42 R v Suttie [2007] NZCA 201; BL v R [2013] NZHC 2878; Biernat v R [2013] NZHC 3478; R v D [2014] NZHC 2233; Davey [2010] NZHPDT;397 D [2003] NZMPDT 235. 43 Last page of CC report of 18 February 2015. 21 [101] Dr CC says that the combination of more marked impairment and “the presence of depressive symptoms” greatly increase the risk of suicidality. This prediction appears to be based on the generalisation that a “rate of suicide in those

5. Retemeyer v Loloa - Estate of Tahuaka Waipouri (2016) 129 Taitokerau MB 288 (129 TTK 288) [pdf, 363 KB]

   129 Taitokerau MB 288 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130006264 UNDER Sections 108, 113, 115, 118 and 242 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an application by Buster Retemeyer also known as Buster Waipouri for succession to Tahuaka Waipouri also known as Tahuaka Ngakete BETWEEN BUSTER RETEMEYER Applicant AND CHRISTINE LOLOA Respondent Hearing: 29 September 2014, 93 Taitokerau MB 1

6. [2008] Olsen v Carter Holt Harvey IT Ltd Full Court [Chief Judge Colgan, Judges Shaw and Couch, AC 45/08 [pdf, 97 KB]

   OLSEN V CARTER HOLT HARVEY IT LTD AK AC 45/08 24 November 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 45/08 ARC 4/08 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ADRIENNE OLSEN Plaintiff AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY IT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18, 19 and 20 August 2008 (Heard at Auckland) Court: Chief Judge G L Colgan Judge C M Shaw Judge A A Couch Appearances: Jim Roberts and Genise Luen, counsel for plaintiff Pet

7. BORA Policing Bill [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...to: • prevent the perception by the public that the Police have endorsed or support a particular business or product; and • prevent people from having the mistaken belief that a person using a Police uniform or article is a Police employee. 101. We consider these to be significant and important objectives. 102. In reaching this conclusion, we note that these objectives are shared by other important marks in New Zealand. For example, the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1...

8. Mullane v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 417 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 40 Reference No. HRRT 011/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN BRIAN GREGORY MULLANE PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Ms ST Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr BG Mullane in person

9. [2018] NZEmpC 77 Jones v Downer NZ Ltd [pdf, 482 KB]

   ...punished because of him and that the reason for this action was unjustified. (d) Mr Jones pleaded the meeting of 24 June went beyond a discussion of the proposed roster because of the remark by Mr Gray. (e) His suspension on 25 June 2016. [101] For each alleged disadvantage compensation of $10,000 under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Act was sought. During closing submissions, the claims arising from the meeting on 18 May 2016, and relating to Jones Electrical, were withdrawn. Each...

10. [2021] NZREADT 19 - Moseley v The Real Estate Agents Authority & Smith (29 April 2021) [pdf, 355 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZREADT 19 READT 031/20 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN RAYMOND STANLEY MOSELEY Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1907) First Respondent AND DEAN SMITH Second Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Ms C Sandelin, Member Mr N O’Connor, Member