[2023] NZEnvC 255 Abrahamson v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 290 KB]
...contravene s9. It held that where a resource consent is granted for any proposal which includes some activities that are permitted, such activities will be protected against any subsequent changes to the plan as an existing land use under s10. [101] The HC decision in Cable Bay Wine31 had also referred to Doogue J’s discussion of the bundling concept in Zindia, noting that bundling applied in the orthodox sense cannot be construed as meaning that where resource consent is grant...