Search Results

1. Finn and Anor as Trustees of the Angela Poynter Trust v Chen [2011] NZWHT Auckland 40 [pdf, 261 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000078 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 40 BETWEEN JOHN JOSEPH FINN AND ANGELA MARGARET POYNTER AND SHANNON MARIE JONES as Trustees of the ANGELA POYNTER TRUST Claimants AND YUE MIN WANG (Deceased) First Respondent AND XU DONG CHEN Second Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Third Respondent AND COLIN HENRY THOMPSON & SALLYANN THOMPSON (Claim Withdrawn) Fourth Respondents AND PURE REALTY LIMITE

2. Wentzel v Collie [2012] NZWHT Auckland 15 [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...included clause (d). In that case the purchasers discovered after purchasing a house that a CCC had not been issued for it. A Council inspection found that significant repairs including a reclad were required before a CCC could be issued. [101] Mackenzie J held that the responsibility to be satisfied as to the quality of the property purchased including any buildings lies entirely on the buyer and held that clause 6.2.5 was not a warranty as to quality and should not be c...

3. Hamilton v Trustees of Erepeti Marae - Tuahu 3X (2009) 128 Wairoa MB 77 (128 WR 77) [pdf, 931 KB]

   ...Paki v Maori Land Court [1999]3 NZLR 700 & Proprietors of Mangakino Township v The Maori Land Court & Anor (CA 65/99, 16 June 1999, Wellington) 23 Ellis v Faulkner - Pori pori Farm A Block (1996) 57 Tauranga ME 7 (57 T 7) 128 Wairoa MB 101 application for the removal of trustees and thus the trustees perfonuance is only relevant to the extent that it impacts on issues raised by the applicant in his pursuit of anmqwry. Discussion by the Court [72] It is clear to this Cour...

4. BORA Foreshore and Seabed Bill [pdf, 125 KB]

   Foreshore and Seabed Bill Attorney-General 6 May 2004 1. I set out below my views on the consistency of the Foreshore and Seabed Bill (the Bill") with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 ("BORA"). In summary, I consider that the Bill is consistent with BORA. 2. My approach in this opinion is: 2.1 to consider whether there is any prima facie breach of a provision of the Bill. I conclude there is no prima facie breach of sections 20, 21 or 27(3) but accept there

5. LCRO 196/2013 XM v WG [pdf, 481 KB]

   ...dialogue with Mrs XM. [100] Nor was it the case that Ms WG failed to provide any response to request for clarification on the renunciation issue. On 12 December 2012, Ms WG informed Mrs XM’s lawyer that she continued to be instructed by Mr HY. [101] On 25 January 2013, Ms WG sought to clarify with Mrs XM, her understanding of their discussions concerning Mr HY. In an email to Mrs XM she advised: With regards to the executor we only discussed a possible renunciation by the execu...

6. Abraham v Auckland City Council [pdf, 111 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 3368 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN Carole Ann Abraham and Mary Helen Webb Claimants AND Auckland City Council First Respondent AND Peter Raymond Hinton Second Respondent AND Geoffrey Joyce (now struck out) Third Respondent AND Steven Clement Miller Fourth Respondent AND Derek Lloyd Divers Fifth Respondent Hearing: 21 August 2007 Appearances: Ms M

7. Balatbat v Sparks [2016] NZIACDT 27 [pdf, 254 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZIACDT27 Reference No: IACDT 036/15 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Edwin Balatbat Complainant AND Lindsay Charles Sparks Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms G Kelly, lawyer, MBIE,

8. [2016] NZEmpC 87 Kupa v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd [pdf, 248 KB]

   HALLAM NGARUPA KUPA v SILVER FERN FARMS BEEF LIMITED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 87 [7 July 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 87 EMPC 79/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN HALLAM NGARUPA KUPA Plaintiff AND SILVER FERN FARMS BEEF LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 13, 14 and 15 June 2016 Appearances: S Mitchell, counsel for the plaintiff T

9. [2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   FREDRICK PRETORIUS v MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 95 [2 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 95 EMPC 323/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN FREDRICK PRETORIUS Plaintiff AND MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED Defendant EMPC 376/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Rela

10. JE v AC and SY LCRO 259/2012 (17 February 2015) [pdf, 154 KB]

    ...move in a different direction from the “ministerial leadership of the church over past years…”.37 [100] The notice of appeal therefore clearly signalled past ministerial leadership, including that of Mr AC, was relevant to its appeal. [101] Mr AC and Dr SY provided copies of Mrs JE’s correspondence to the [place name] congregation dated 22 October 2009. Her correspondence confirms her instructions, terms of engagement, and fees. An authority for Mrs JE to act, dated 25...