Starik v Auckland Council [2016] NZWHT Auckland 5 [pdf, 491 KB]
...that led to damage and the need to remediate this significantly damaged wall and the framing associated with it. Defect four – top fixed handrail through balustrade tops [100] This defect is depicted in Mr Gray’s brief of evidence. 18 [101] Mr Gray’s evidence was that this construction was contrary to: 17 Above n 4, at photographs 96–99. 18 Above n 4, at photographs 31–37, 58–69 and 108–109. 22 (a)...