Search Results

1. Outstanding Applications December 2019 [pdf, 636 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

2. Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre [2021] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...of that person, it shall be a defence for that person to prove that he or she or it took such steps as were reasonably practicable to prevent the employee from doing that act, or from doing as an employee of that person acts of that description. [101] Accordingly, we must determine: [101.1] Whether Ms Abraham was acting as an employee of MCLC; and if so [101.2] Whether MCLC took such steps as were reasonably practicable to prevent its employee, Ms Abraham, from doing, as an employee, t...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 109 McCook v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 333 KB]

   ...that these mechanisms were not utilised for the purposes of the plaintiffs’ roles. [100] I accept the evidence which has been placed before the Court by the Department as to these distinctions. I uphold IR’s objection in that regard. [101] IR submits that training materials need not be disclosed because it accepts that both IR employees and Madison workers undertaking particular work received the same training, at least in respect of the Frontline Foundation hearing package...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 181 A Labour Inspector v New Zealand Fusion International Ltd [pdf, 299 KB]

   A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v NEWZEALAND FUSION INTERNATIONAL LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 181 [11 December 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 181 EMPC 19/2018 IN THE MATTER OF an application for the exercise of powers under sections 142B, 142E, 142J, 142W and 142X of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN A LABOUR IN

5. Outstanding Applications February 2020 [pdf, 436 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

6. Outstanding Applications April 2020 [pdf, 479 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 62 Gibson-Smith v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 388 KB]

   ...statement in the new IEA altering the scope or description of duties which had applied to Mr Gibson-Smith for many years. This agreement also provided for variation of terms, provided these were in writing and approved by the parties: cl 4. [101] The reality was that Mr Gibson-Smith undertook the same duties thereafter, as he had undertaken for MBIE previously. Accordingly, the various statements in the IEA could not be construed as an agreement between the parties that there woul...

8. Vivash v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 282 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 029/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN STUART HAROLD VIVASH PLAINTIFF AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION DEFENDANT AT PALMERSTON NORTH BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Mr MJM Keefe QSM JP, Member Ms ST Scott QSM, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr SH Vivash in person Mr D Tuiqereqere for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 10, 11 and 12 June 2019 DATE OF DECISION: 27 May 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1

9. Director of Proceedings v McMillan [2020] NZHRRT 19 [pdf, 411 KB]

   ...strong: two in every ten minutes, lasting 60 seconds. The cervix was 8-9cm dilated, with the fetus in an OP asynclitic31 fetal position, with no caput moulding.32 The registrar’s impression was “Malpresentation. Analgesia requirement.” 101. The Referral Guidelines set out a ‘Process for transfer of clinical responsibility for care’ that require: • a three-way conversation between the LMC, the woman and the specialist to determine that the transfer of care is appropria...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 172 Cowan v Idea Services Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

    ...found at the time, but that a week later there did appear to be a bruise, stated that in her experience a bruise could take time to appear. But she was not convinced it was the alleged slap which had caused the bruising observed at that stage. [101] In light of these circumstances, Mr Meikle asked Ms Transom whether consideration had been given to the obtaining of expert evidence, possibly from a psychologist. She explained that the likelihood of Mr C being seen by a psychologist...