Search Results

1. LCRO 196/2013 XM v WG [pdf, 481 KB]

   ...dialogue with Mrs XM. [100] Nor was it the case that Ms WG failed to provide any response to request for clarification on the renunciation issue. On 12 December 2012, Ms WG informed Mrs XM’s lawyer that she continued to be instructed by Mr HY. [101] On 25 January 2013, Ms WG sought to clarify with Mrs XM, her understanding of their discussions concerning Mr HY. In an email to Mrs XM she advised: With regards to the executor we only discussed a possible renunciation by the execu...

2. Abraham v Auckland City Council [pdf, 111 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 3368 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN Carole Ann Abraham and Mary Helen Webb Claimants AND Auckland City Council First Respondent AND Peter Raymond Hinton Second Respondent AND Geoffrey Joyce (now struck out) Third Respondent AND Steven Clement Miller Fourth Respondent AND Derek Lloyd Divers Fifth Respondent Hearing: 21 August 2007 Appearances: Ms M

3. Balatbat v Sparks [2016] NZIACDT 27 [pdf, 254 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZIACDT27 Reference No: IACDT 036/15 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Edwin Balatbat Complainant AND Lindsay Charles Sparks Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms G Kelly, lawyer, MBIE,

4. [2016] NZEmpC 87 Kupa v Silver Fern Farms Beef Ltd [pdf, 248 KB]

   HALLAM NGARUPA KUPA v SILVER FERN FARMS BEEF LIMITED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 87 [7 July 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 87 EMPC 79/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN HALLAM NGARUPA KUPA Plaintiff AND SILVER FERN FARMS BEEF LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 13, 14 and 15 June 2016 Appearances: S Mitchell, counsel for the plaintiff T

5. [2016] NZEmpC 95 Pretorius v Marra Construction (2004) Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   FREDRICK PRETORIUS v MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 95 [2 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 95 EMPC 323/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN FREDRICK PRETORIUS Plaintiff AND MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED Defendant EMPC 376/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Rela

6. JE v AC and SY LCRO 259/2012 (17 February 2015) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...move in a different direction from the “ministerial leadership of the church over past years…”.37 [100] The notice of appeal therefore clearly signalled past ministerial leadership, including that of Mr AC, was relevant to its appeal. [101] Mr AC and Dr SY provided copies of Mrs JE’s correspondence to the [place name] congregation dated 22 October 2009. Her correspondence confirms her instructions, terms of engagement, and fees. An authority for Mrs JE to act, dated 25...

7. Chen v Gu-Chang [2013] NZIACDT 16 (19 March 2013) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...was open that Mr Chen’s file belonged to him and he was entitled to be provided with it, although Ms Gu-Chang and Mr Loh were entitled to retain a copy. It appeared Mr Loh and Ms Gu-Chang acknowledged that was the position. 11 [101] The material before the Tribunal indicated Mr Chen twice attempted to get his file and was refused unless he signed a document purporting to absolve Mr Loh and Ms Gu-Chang from liability for the professional services he received. [102] The...

8. Dablo v Tan [2013] NZIACDT 28 (20 May 2013) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...pay substantial fees and disbursements if the complaint was lodged with the Tribunal. [100] This Tribunal has no jurisdiction to make an order against a person lodging a complaint. Both Ms Tan and her counsel ought to have been aware of that. [101] Any attempt to stifle a complaint by threats would potentially amount to serious professional misconduct, and aggravated a complaint. 10 [102] Ms Tan and her counsel were requested to explain the basis on which they made the...

9. Wiezoreck v McHugh [2013] NZIACDT 35 (4 June 2013) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...nature of the “budget service” precluded her taking professional responsibility for the outcome. She said that after a client filed an application they may take steps without reference to her, and prejudice their case. Further documentation [101] Ms McHugh produced a copy of her file, and also statutory declarations from Mr Rupert Ward, the director of Oceania. Mr Ward discussed meeting with Mr Wiezoreck and Ms Mulder, and also spoke of what he considered to be Ms McHugh’s high...

10. ENV-2016-AKL-000275 Dilworth Trust Board v New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 10 MB]

    ...HeIght Intense, high quality, compact city fonn. In this regard. DIlworth supports the ·Addltlonal Zone Controls Height Control· overtay as It applles to their landholdings at the fon0v.4ng sites: 99 Remuera Road (NlI'Mnarket, 24.5m16 storeys) 101 Remuera Road (Newmarket, 24.5mJ6storeys) 8 51 Marks Road (Newmarket. 24.5m16 storeys) 9 51 Marks Road (Newmarket, Z4.5m16 storeys) 47D-474 Broadway (NewmalXet, 24.5ml6storeys) 476-480 Broadway (NewmalXel 24.5m16 storeys) 500 Broa...