Search Results

1. BMN v Stonewood Group Ltd [2024] NZHRRT 64 [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...these costs were incurred. There is a clear causal connection between the interference with privacy and these costs and accordingly Stonewood is required to pay these expenses. Damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings [101] For damages to be awarded under this head, there must be a material causal connection between any humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings experienced by the plaintiff and the interference with their privacy.30 The award of dam...

2. Appellate judgments 2021

   ...OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP PROBLEMS - whether Authority had exclusive jurisdiction for employee's claim - Authority has exclusive jurisdiction if problem can be described under s 161(1) - Authority had exclusive jurisdiction for employee's claim. [2021] NZSC 101 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPLY FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL DISMISSED - minor factual errors corrected in previous judgment. [2021] NZSC 67 Gill Pizza v A Labour Inspector (Ministry of Business, Inno...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Appellate court judgments

3. Waitangi Tribunal - Report on the Māori Community Development Act Claim [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...election promise, 1957 93 3 4 3 seeking an agreement with the Labour Government, 1957–59 97 3 4 4 The Dominion Māori Conference, october 1959 101 3 4 5 forging an agreement with the Labour Government, 1959–60 108 3 4 6 The agreement between Māori and Labour falls over, october 1960 116 3 4 7 forging an agreement with the national Governme...

4. Mr-Rasheeds-Authorities.pdf [pdf, 7.1 MB]

   AUTHORITIES 1 Jordan v United Kingdom [2001] ECHR 327. 2 Osman v the United Kingdom [1998] ECHR 101 3 R (Middleton) v West Somerset Coroner [2004] 2 AC 182. 4 Sarjantson v Humberside Police Chief Constable [2013] EWCA Civ 125 5 Wallace v Attorney General [2021] NZCA 506 6 Anjum Rahman, Aliya Danzeisen, Maysoon Salama. (2019). Submissions of IWCNZ to Royal Commission of Inquiry. [online]. Available at: https://islamicwomenscouncilnz.co.nz/submissions-iwcnz/ [Accessed 25 Jan. 2022] 7 Royal...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - Ngāti Kahu Remedies Report [pdf, 5.3 MB]

   T H E N G Ā T I K A H U R E M E D I E S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t h e N g ā t i K a h u R e m e d i e s R e p o r t W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 3 W A I 4 5 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.gov

6. Waitangi Tribunal - Mangatū Remedies Report [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .99 (3) Incorporations and the Crown’s settlement framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 (4) Tribunal comment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 4 .5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

7. The Sentencing Act 2002: monitoring the first year [pdf, 167 KB]

   The Sentencing Act 2002: Monitoring the First Year Rajesh Chhana Philip Spier Susan Roberts Chris Hurd March 2004 2 Contents INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................................3 SUMMARY...............................................................................................................................................................................3 SENT

8. Barlow v Phillips - Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and other blocks (2012) 282 Aotea MB 75 (282 AOT 75) [pdf, 419 KB]

   BARLOW V PHILLIPS MLC 282 Aotea MB 75 [3 May 2012] IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 282 Aotea MB 75 (282 AOT 75) A20080015133 UNDER Section 238 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and other Blocks (Manu Ariki Marae) BETWEEN FAITH BARLOW AND BEVERLY MURAAHI Applicants AND TEINA PHILLIPS First Respondent AND TE KOTAHITANGA SOCIETY INCORPORATED Second Respondent AND WAITUHI

9. Heads v Attorney-General [2015] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 703 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 12 Reference No. HRRT 048/2011 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN ERNEST FINDLAY HEADS PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT DUNEDIN BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Ms ST Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr F McCrimmon for plaintiff Mr IC Carter and Ms AL Graham for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 19, 20 and 21 February 2013; 23 and 24 Ap

10. Youth Court - Signed, sealed – (but not yet fully) delivered [pdf, 817 KB]

    1 “Signed, Sealed – (but not yet fully) Delivered” An analysis of the “revolutionary” 1989 legislative blueprint to address youth offending in New Zealand, particularly by young Māori, and a discussion as to the extent to which it has been fully realised. Paper to be delivered at the “Healing Courts, Healing Plans, Healing People: International Indigenous Therapeutic Jurisprudence Conference” by His Honour Judge Andrew Becroft1