Search Results

1. NO & NTO v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 44 (01 August 2013) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...[100.3] That clause 3(d) of the Code required him to provide a refund of fees payable when his engagement ceased. [100.4] That the fees were repayable as they were not fair or reasonable. [100.5] He breached the Code by failing to refund fees. [101] The Tribunal was conscious Mr Hakaoro had not produced the relevant records, and the material before the Tribunal indicated there was no attempt to comply with the Code. 13 Unprofessional language and discussion [102]...

2. QX v ZW LCRO 134/2014 (21 October 2016) [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...2008 [100] The Act came into effect on 1 August 2008. The Act sets up a complaints mechanism to deal with complaints about lawyer conduct after that date. The Committee did not separately address the issue of Ms ZW’s conduct before that date. [101] However as significant events occurred after Ms ZW was retained in mid-2006 but before 1 August 2008, it is necessary to consider whether any conduct issues arise that must be considered under the prior legislation. Legal tests [102]...

3. ENV-2016-AKL-000274 Rockfield Trust v KiwiRail Holdings Limited [pdf, 15 MB]

   ...AffecteS r 009-33 View Newmarket Protection - Areas _ Mt H~g~~~t Affected :,' .', : :.',::-: : E05-29 View Ser La H09-13 VI OnehUng:~p~otection - Affected Are~s orway Footways Service Lanes District Boundary UPDATED 28101/15 G11 PLANNING ADDITIONAL LMI AP No 3 MITATIONS i1tJ 1:7000 I CITY OF AUCKLAND 1ST DISTRICT PLAN HMUS SECTION - OPERATIVE 1999 200m I ill ( <2 'I / ANNEXURE (c) -IHP REPORT AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEP...

4. Mairs v The Real Estates Agents Authority (CAC 413) NZREADT 9 [pdf, 819 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 9 READT 040/17 IN THE MATTER OF A charge laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BOUGHT BY THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 413) AGAINST GEOFFREY MAIRS Defendant READT 045/17 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GEOFFREY MAIRS Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 41

5. [2017] NZEmpC 150 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs Ltd [pdf, 492 KB]

   KAMLESH PRASAD v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2017] NZEmpC 150 [29 November 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2017] NZEmpC 150 EMPC 253/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN KAMLESH PRASAD First Plaintiff AND LIUTOFAGA TULAI Second Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant AND SO

6. [2020] NZEnvC 170 Smith v Young.pdf [pdf, 7.8 MB]

   ...perm length of wall W~ have completed an addllional check on the shear and moment demand below the ground surface lo connrm !hat the cornposlte timber ancl concrete strength has suttlclent capacity. • Shear demand 2.8 m below ground surface V1,.,101•1_grouni' - 44. 71<N perm length of wall • Moment demand 2 m below ground surface Mbplow_Jlrour.c1" - 40.2 l<Nm per Iii l~ngth of wall 2.3.1 Timber Plies The proposed de11ign is for 5.5 rn long, 325 mm diameter timbe...

7. LCRO 74/2020 NS v AD (29 January 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...once the work visa was granted. Ms AD was anxious to remain permanently in New Zealand. [100] Although the work visa was automatically extended, this only occurred on the lodging of a completed application. For that, legal work was necessary. [101] This was largely carried out by Ms H, with oversight by Mr NS, and unpaid assistance from Ms G and to a lesser extent, Dr S. [102] There is nothing to suggest that the immigration work in relation to the work visa application, was any...

8. LCRO 156/2016 KZ v XL on behalf of [Company A] (18 January 2019) [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...early July 2013) there were time pressures to prepare a response to the Council’s application to strike out the District Court proceedings — [Company A]’s affidavits were due to be filed and served in that Court by 15 July 2013. 21 [101] [Company A] had some concerns about its exposure in relation to the application to strike out the District Court proceedings, and after speaking to both directors of [Company A], Ms KZ said that she received instructions to try and navigat...

9. LCRO 034/2017 TC v DM (30 April 2019) [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...preference to settle as soon as possible, thus avoiding the possibility of her incurring a penalty for late settlement in the form of a requirement to compensate the purchaser for rent the purchaser would have received from the sitting tenant. [101] Whilst Ms DM had advised Ms TC of the agreement to extend the settlement date, she had not provided a specific date for Ms TC to work to. Ms TC was understandably aware of the difficulties that could arise if there was any uncertainty...

10. LCRO 240/2016 HM v NL (28 November 2018) [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...[100] The reference to a partnership ought immediately to have triggered enquiry by Ms NL. Was this a business partnership? Was this a de facto partnership? What contributions were each making to the partnership (whatever its nature)? 22 [101] Ms NL describes Mr HM as merely being Ms Z’s agent, and she argues that this arrangement was no different from any other where an agent is involved. She gives the example of a real estate agent acting as a broker for either vendor o...