3476 items matching your search terms
LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2025] NZLCRO 036 Ref: LCRO 111/2024 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN MS Applicant AND PC Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] The applicant,
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF APPELLANT PROHIBITED BY S 160 (1), (2) AND (3) OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001. SEE https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2001/0049/latest/DLM101854.html IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 141 ACAR 041/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NF Appe
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 147 ACAR 10/2023 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN EDMOND CHALECKI Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 28 May 2024 Supplementary submissions: 14 June 2024 Heard at: Christchurch / Ōtautahi Appearances: Mr Edmond Chalecki, appellant in person, with his wife
...these costs were incurred. There is a clear causal connection between the interference with privacy and these costs and accordingly Stonewood is required to pay these expenses. Damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings [101] For damages to be awarded under this head, there must be a material causal connection between any humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings experienced by the plaintiff and the interference with their privacy.30 The award of dam...
...Act to complain about fees charged to the Trust before she became a beneficiary? [100] The Committee considered that the applicant had no standing to complain about fees charged to the Trust before she became a beneficiary on 31 August 2020. [101] Section 132(2) of the Act relevantly provides that: Any person who is chargeable with a bill of costs, whether it has been paid or not, may complain … about the amount of any bill of costs rendered by a practitioner ... [102] Section 1...
...every other [ABC] member: to ensure its ongoing success. [100] I accept that membership of a charitable trust combined with the natural hope that it will succeed in its aims and objectives, amounts to a personal interest in that organisation. [101] However, I do not consider that Mr OQ’s membership of [ABC] in those limited terms gave rise to a personal interest that conflicted or risked conflicting with Mrs BV and Mr XV, for whom he was acting in litigation against [C1]. 16 [1...
2024 Chief Judge's MB 1323 Sycamore v Kusabs - Paenoa Te Akau B Block [2024] Chief Judge’s MB 1323 (2024 CJ 1323) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP-20230000024267 A20210011722 CJ 2021/46 WĀHANGA Under Sections 44 and 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Paenoa Te Akau B Block I WAENGA I A Between ALLAN SYCAMORE AS A T
...OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP PROBLEMS - whether Authority had exclusive jurisdiction for employee's claim - Authority has exclusive jurisdiction if problem can be described under s 161(1) - Authority had exclusive jurisdiction for employee's claim. [2021] NZSC 101 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPLY FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL DISMISSED - minor factual errors corrected in previous judgment. [2021] NZSC 67 Gill Pizza v A Labour Inspector (Ministry of Business, Inno...
...request; and (d) responding to her initial complaint to the firm by asserting that her instructions to settle on the basis of the price reduction had been communicated to him by the agent and that there was “no grey area” about the matter. [101] Other than to describe the respondent’s complaint as “outrageous” and to describe her as “disingenuous” in making it in his response to the complaint, which was not the most sensible approach for the applicant to adopt in the ci...
THERE IS AN INTERIM ORDER PREVENTING PUBLICATION OF THE NAME OR IDENTIFYING DETAILS OF THE PRACTITIONER CHARGED AND PREVENTING THE INSPECTION OF THE FILE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE CHAIR OR DEPUTY CHAIR OF THE TRIBUNAL. THERE IS A FURTHER ORDER PREVENTING THE PUBLICATION OF THE NAMES OF THE WITNESSES, OTHER THAN MADISON BROWN OR ROBERT TOWNER. THESE ORDERS MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. THE INTERIM NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS IN RESPECT OF MR MULLIGAN’S NAME