Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 205 Todd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 3.3 MB]

   ...decision in Man O'War Station Limiteci56 and the discussion on those and other cases, and related principles, in Upper Clutha Environmental Soc Inc. 57 For instance, identifying values is important for understanding 55 56 57 King Salmon at (101]. Man O'War Station Limited v Auckland City Council (2017] NZCA 24 at [86]. Upper Clutha Environmental Society Inc & Ors v Queenstown Lakes District Council (2019] NZEnvC 205, at (105]-(111]. I ' - -' ~ L...

2. LCRO 162/2018 BQ v XR (29 September 2020) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...BQ does not, in my view, provide either a fair or accurate assessment of Mr XR’s position. [100] It is sound and prudent advice for a lawyer at commencement to counsel their client as to the benefits and advantages of attempting settlement. [101] Avoiding having their client become ensnared in prolonged and bitter argument over division of relationship property is a laudable objective for any lawyer, but it is not an objective that is properly achieved by demand that their client...

3. Wairakei Pastoral Limited [pdf, 452 KB]

   1 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT / I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA AT AUCKLAND UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 A N D IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Act BETWEEN WAIRAKEI PASTORAL LIMITED (ENV – 2020 – AKL – ) Appellant WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL 8 JULY 2020 Counsel instructed: Bronwyn Carruthers Shortland Chamb

4. August-2020-Notification-of-Applications-in-Office-of-Chief-Registrar.pdf [pdf, 496 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

5. September-2020-Notification-of-Applications-in-Office-of-Chief-Registrar [pdf, 564 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

6. LCRO 194/2017 MA v NB, OC and PD (20 September 2019) [pdf, 344 KB]

   ...the reason I’ve taken the time to pursue this complaint is my concern for other psychologists facing disciplinary proceedings, and the wider implications if they also have received/will receive advice on service of such poor quality”.18 [101] It is argument that the conduct of the lawyers (and the firm) was so egregious that it demands a disciplinary response which would, in some way, circumvent the lawyer’s capacity to provide legal advice on matters relating to professional...

7. [2019] NZEmpC 187 Byrne v The New Zealand Transport Agency [pdf, 411 KB]

   ...request followed the confidential settlement inevitably led Mr Houba to believe that there was a significant reason impacting on Mrs Byrne’s suitability to work on the Project. The totality of statements made on behalf of NZTA was disparaging. [101] I find that, when considered in the context in which they arose, the remarks made amounted to a breach of cl 9 of the record of settlement. [102] I referred earlier to the submissions made by counsel about two disparagement cases,...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 73 Waste Management NZ Ltd v Jones [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...provide relevant information. With one possible exception, to be discussed shortly, all of the requests for information were adequately and promptly answered by Waste Management by emails on 26 April 2016, 2 May 2016, 8 and 9 June 2016. [101] On 25 April 2016 Mr Thompson emailed the first request for information, making it clear that the meeting Mr Shipley had requested would not take place without the material sought being supplied. The request was for: (a) a copy o...

9. [2019] NZEmpC 113 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories Ltd v Scott [pdf, 576 KB]

   ...correspondence, and stated that all feedback provided had been considered. Responding to several issues raised by Mr Scott, Genesys stated that although the original proposal had noted the 4 Case Note 210106 [2010] NZ PrivCmr 14. benefits of reducing the need for travel, this was not its main rationale. Reduction in travel costs would be a minor benefit. [42] Mr Scott had stated he was prepared to change the focus of his...

10. LCRO 105/2018 SW v NL (23 August 2019) [pdf, 292 KB]

    ...“referred to and dealt with” the alleged client, the lawyer’s file material will be of assistance.12 [100] Adopting that approach, whilst Ms SW had her own lawyer acting for her, that was primarily in respect of the relationship property matter. [101] In his [date] 2017 email to Ms SW’s lawyer, to which he attached a copy of the sale agreement, Mr NL stated he was “happy to attend on the conveyancing aspects of the sale”. Mr CN explained that this was on the basis Ms SW...