Search Results

Search results for 101.

3476 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 240/2016 HM v NL (28 November 2018) [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...[100] The reference to a partnership ought immediately to have triggered enquiry by Ms NL. Was this a business partnership? Was this a de facto partnership? What contributions were each making to the partnership (whatever its nature)? 22 [101] Ms NL describes Mr HM as merely being Ms Z’s agent, and she argues that this arrangement was no different from any other where an agent is involved. She gives the example of a real estate agent acting as a broker for either vendor o...

  2. [2020] NZREADT 34 - Hammond v Real Estate Agents Authority (11 August 2020) [pdf, 386 KB]

    BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 34 READT 002/2020 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN TERESA and BRIAN HAMMOND Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 520) First Respondent AND SONIA TAFILIPEPE Second Respondent Hearing: 23 July 2020, at Christchurch Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr G Denley, Mem

  3. LCRO 203/2017 HI v JK (6 August 2020) [pdf, 314 KB]

    ...undertaken, the payment in question should relate to a fixed fee, and an invoice should have been issued. The Committee concluded that Mr JK’s fees were to be fixed, and acknowledged that at the time of payment, Mr JK had not issued an invoice. [101] At the hearing, Mr JK was emphatic that he had informed Mr HI prior to meeting with him at court that he charged a fixed fee for a first attendance at court. [102] Mr JK explained that this fee was to include work in: (a) meeting w...

  4. LCRO 104/2019 RY v DN (1 May 2020) [pdf, 273 KB]

    ...work done, is a reference to “discussing ownership arrangements with you”. 20 [100] Mr DN attached to his reporting letter a copy of the certificate of title recording the parties’ respective shares in the ownership of the property. [101] The documentary evidence supports Mr DN’s position. [102] Mr and Mrs EW, being present at the September 2008 meeting, are able to provide their recollections of what transpired. [103] Mr DN says that Mr and Mrs EW have verified all th...

  5. Abernethy v Coughlan [pdf, 95 KB]

    ...time as a site manager. [100] Mr Humphrey said he obtained quotes, for the windows etc, and arranged delivery dates. He did a lot of the work as and when required, a lot of it on his cell phone. He would telephone the suppliers. [101] When the problem was discovered with the water flowing from 3 Pupuke Road, the Council instructed what the remedy was and a drain layer was engaged. [102] Concerning the question of whether anybody was responsible for the quality o...

  6. Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd [pdf, 97 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2008-100-000091 BETWEEN JOSEPH CHEE and MARGARET CHEE Claimants AND STAREAST INVESTMENT LIMITED First Respondent AND MANUKAU CITY COUNCIL Second Respondent AND PATRICK HUNG Third Respondent AND T.Q. CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND BRIAN CHARLES TAYLOR Fifth Respondent AND SPOUTING AND STEEL ROOFING WORLD LIMITED Sixth Respondent AND RAYMOND PHILLIP BROCKLISS Seventh Respondent AND CSR BUILDIN

  7. Easton v Mayers [pdf, 298 KB]

    CLAIM NO: TRI-2007-101-00003 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN Craig Easton and Tania Easton Claimant AND Brian Mayers First Respondent AND Nelson City Council Second Respondent AND Murray Pine Third Respondent AND Cathryn Grace Leov Fourth Respondent (now removed) AND Susan Margaret Leov Fifth Respondent (now removed) Dates of Hearing: 17, 18, 19 Decembe

  8. Harris & Ors as Trustees of the Estuary Trust v Veltman [2010] NZWHT Auckland 19 [pdf, 231 KB]

    Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000049 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 19 BETWEEN COLIN PITTS HARRIS, DIANE JUNE HARRIS, PAMELA ANNE HOVELLE and PATRICE MAREE ALMOND as Trustees of the ESTUARY TRUST Claimant AND KIM VELTMAN First Respondent AND DAVID MAXWELL CHAPMAN Second Respondent AND NIGEL GREAVES (Removed) Third Respondent AND ROGER JAMES FRANKS Fourth Respondent AND BRUCE JAMES HUNTER Fifth Respondent AND MATHEW PA

  9. Johnston v Abide Homes Limited [pdf, 140 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2008-100-000101 BETWEEN BRUCE McGREGOR JOHNSTON and HEATHER LILLIAN JOHNSTON Claimants AND ABIDE HOMES LIMITED First Respondent AND ALBERT LAURENCE SANDS (Removed) Second Respondent AND GEOFFREY and PEGGY TOWNE Third Respondent AND STUART GRAHAM SIZEMORE (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND ANTHONY PAUL GRUBNER Fifth Respondent AND MURRAY SCOTT ABBOT Sixth Respondent AND ELLIS ALBERT MILLER Seventh Respon