Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 127 Carrington Jade LP v Grant [pdf, 385 KB]

   ...another, where she was “on holiday” 55 Samoa, above n 11, at [28]. 56 Roussy v Minister of National Revenue (1992) 148 NR 74 (FCA) at [7]. 57 Bank of Montreal v United Steelworkers of America 87 CLLC 16,044 (CLRB) at [37]–[38]. [101] There is no doubt that on some occasions, the daily hours worked, and the particular days of the week which were worked, varied, but the point is that there was a consistent expectation on the part of each employer that she would be...

2. LCRO 53/2023 PN v QZ (26 October 2023) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...Nevertheless, as the Guidelines properly recognise, where the review is of the exercise of a discretion, it is appropriate for the Review Officer to exercise some particular caution before substituting his or her own judgment without good reason. [101] More recently, the High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:2 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determination are entitled to a review ba...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 037 Hensman v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 461 KB]

   ...consenting process, particularly those aspects of a subdivision that are regulated by rules in the district plan. Nor can the EA process or the revisit consent conditions incorporating SCOP design requirements. Condition 8 does not allow that. [101] It goes without saying that such a discretion is not available when the council is considering an application to certify compliance with resource consent conditions under s224(c). The s224(c) certification process is not dependent upo...

4. MacNaughtan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury/Causation) [2023] NZACC 160 [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...ongoing lip issues, the unpleasant discolouration of facial pigment, and because he seemed rather stressed. At the time we were unsure of the reason for stress, but put it down to the changes to his facial appearance, and probably school exams. [101] His father also recorded that between 20 May and c 24 June, his son took about 55 x 10 mg Oratane (Isotretinoin) tablets. [102] The medical notes of 27 July 2016 record that Dr Gould rang the appellant’s father and the note is: Exc...

5. People with finalised charges and convicted of homicide offences jun2024 [xlsx, 116 KB]

   ...death Convicted 78 77 70 96 106 70 70 74 68 83 81% 72% 80% 77% 82% 70% 69% 70% 70% 76% Other proved 7 10 4 12 7 6 16 14 10 6 7% 9% 5% 10% 5% 6% 16% 13% 10% 6% Not proved 11 20 12 16 17 23 15 18 19 17 11% 19% 14% 13% 13% 23% 15% 17% 20% 16% Other 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 3% Total 96 107 87 124 130 100 101 106 97 109 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0100: Homicide and related offences not further defined Convicted 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 33% 0% 0% 0% 0%...

6. Mota v Accident Compensation Corporation (Deemed cover decision) [2025] NZACC 47 (20 March 2025) [pdf, 342 KB]

   ...seems to be an attempt now to manufacture a claim at an earlier time and the Court does not accept that the 7 December 2023 and 15 July 2024 alternatives put forward by Mr Forster amount to a claim for cover for lateral epicondylitis as a WRGPI. [101] I understand from the Corporation’s submission of 3 October 2024 to the review hearing that the Corporation received a formal request for cover of lateral epicondylitis as a WRGPI on 26 September 2024 by way of Mr Forster’s email....

7. [2024] NZSSAA 10 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 340 KB]

   Reference no: NZSSAA 25/20 [2024] NZSSAA 10 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018. AND IN THE MATTER of an Appeal to the Social Security Appeal Authority by XXXX of Nelson, against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee. BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY R Palu (Chairperson) G Pearson (former Chairperson) T Tran (Member) J Ryall (Member) Representation: Ms

8. [2024] NZSSAA 12 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 405 KB]

   Reference no: NZSSAA 87/22 [2024] NZSSAA 12 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018. AND IN THE MATTER of an Appeal to the Social Security Appeal Authority by XXXX and YYYY of Masterton, against a decision of the Chief Executive that has been confirmed or varied by a Benefits Review Committee. BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY R Palu (Chairperson) J Ryall (Member) Hearing: Wellington, 28 March 2023 Appearances: XXXX and Y

9. Regulatory Impact Statement: Changing name suppression settings in sexual violence cases [pdf, 350 KB]

   Regulatory Impact Statement | 1 Regulatory Impact Statement: Changing name suppression settings in sexual violence cases Coversheet Purpose of Document Decision sought: This Regulatory Impact Statement provides analysis to support Cabinet decisions on a proposal that before the court can grant permanent name suppression to a person convicted of a sexual crime, it must have the agreement of the victim of that crime. Advising agencies: Ministry of Justice Proposing Mi

10. FMI v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claim for Cover for Mental Injury) [2025] NZACC 062 [pdf, 375 KB]

    PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 062 ACAR 271/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN FMI Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORAT