Search Results

1. Langhorne v ACC [2010] NZACA 4 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...injury by accident, means the period commencing on the 7th day after the date of the accident and ending with the 28th day of the period, or with the person’s sooner complete recovery from incapacity due to the accident, or with his death”. [101] Section 104(2) set out the factors relevant to the calculation of an earner who was an employee at the date of accident. The Corporation had a wide discretion to calculate a claimant’s relevant earnings. The subs.(2) considerations w...

2. Cole v Realty Insight Limited [2012] NZWHT Auckland 25 [pdf, 259 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000010 [2012] NZWHT AUCKLAND 25 BETWEEN MICHAEL and ADELE COLE Claimants AND EURO-ASIA INVESTMENTS CO LTD First Respondent (Settled) AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL (formerly NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL) Second Respondent (Settled) AND REALTY INSIGHT LIMITED Third Respondent AND DAVID LEE Fourth Respondent (Settled) AND THEOTESTO REYES Fifth Respondent AND CITYWIDE BUILDING CONSULTANTS (AUCKLAND)

3. Lowe and Ors as Trustees of the Vivienne Hicks Family Trust v Morrison [2011] NZWHT Auckland 27 [pdf, 263 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-100-000036 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 27 BETWEEN VIVIENNE DIANA LOWE, GRAHAM BRENTLEIGH BOND and LORRAINE LILA BARTLEY as Trustees of the VIVIENNE HICKS FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND ROGER MORRISON First Respondent AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Second Respondent AND STUART SAVILL (KERIAN SAVILL removed) Third Respondents AND MAJORIE and ROBERT JANSEN Fourth Respondents AND PLASTER SYSTEMS LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND MA

4. Zhong v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 32 [pdf, 264 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000105 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 32 BETWEEN HONG ZHONG AND RUN ZHONG Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND ROSE MARY MCLAUGHLAN Second Respondent AND YA WEI LI Third Respondent AND STANLEY CHEN Fourth Respondent AND ORIENT BUILDERS LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND LU ZHENG Sixth Respondent AND HBRC LIMITED Seventh Respondent Hearing: 29, 30 and 31 March 2011 Closing

5. Stanimirovic v Levarko [2018] NZIACDT 3 (7 February 2018) [pdf, 350 KB]

   BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2018] NZIACDT 3 Reference No: IACDT 017/16 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Andrej Stanimirovic Complainant AND Howard Levarko Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Mr G La Hood, lawyer, MBIE, We

6. Singh v Singh and Scorpion Liquor (2006) Ltd [2016] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 274 KB]

   IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2016] NZHRRT 38 Reference No. HRRT 032/2013 UNDER Human Rights Act 1993 BETWEEN SATNAM SINGH Plaintiff AND SHANE SINGH First Defendant AND SCORPION LIQUOR (2006) LIMITED Second Defendant AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Judge W K Hastings Deputy Chairperson Dr H Hickey, Member Pastor R Musuku, Member APPEARANCES: S Judd and D Peirse for the Plaintiff S Lance for the Defendan

7. LCRO 95/2019 CM v DL (9 March 2021) [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...the representation he had received from Mr DL. [100] Mr DL had no involvement with the 20[XB] proceedings. It was his recollection that Mr CM had been critical of the performance of counsel who had represented him in the 20[XB] proceedings. [101] Nor do I consider that responsibility for the problems Mr CM encountered in his 20[XI] proceedings can be fairly laid at Mr DL’s door. Mr CM instructed fresh counsel in June 2018. Responsibility for conduct of the 20[XI] proceedings re...

8. [2020] NZEnvC 186 Panuku Development Auckland Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 186 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent R Peters and R Bannan R Dexter and A Modrow N Smith P Lange L Whiley s 27 4 parties Court: Environment Judge M Harland Commissioner K Edmonds Commissioner D Bun

9. [2017] NZEnvC 092 Golden Bay Grandstand v Heritage New Zealand [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT INTHE MAnER AND BETWEEN AND INTHEMAnER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 9 2 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal under section 58 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMMUNITY TRUST (INCORPORATED) (ENV-2016-WLG-000065) Appellant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application under section 316 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMM

10. [2017] NZEmpC 70 Edminstin v Sanford Limited [pdf, 515 KB]

    JOHN EDMINSTIN v SANFORD LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 70 [6 June 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 70 EMPC 80/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JOHN EDMINSTIN Plaintiff AND SANFORD LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 12, 13, 14 and 15 December 2016, 27, 30 and 31 January, and 2 and 3 February 2017 (Heard at Invercargill, in Chambers in A