Search Results

1. Michael Cummings - Statement of Evidence (24 June 2021) [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...Council. 99 If any of these steps have not been followed, the compliance investigation must stop. 100 The process from this point is the same as that set out in paragraphs 78 to 89 above. Recommended amendments to draft consent conditions 101 I have included as Appendix 4 to my evidence a set of proposed consent conditions that I consider address some of the issues I have identified above, and would be enforceable. 102 The first example (Option 1) requires the consent hold...

2. 2019 Directory of Official Information J-L [pdf, 490 KB]

   ...2012 • Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2004 • Secret Commissions Act 1910 • Senior Courts Act 2016 8 Administered jointly with the Department of Corrections. 9 Sections 100 and 101 are administered by the Department of Internal Affairs. 7 • Sentencing Act 200210 • Serious Fraud Office Act 1990 • Simultaneous Deaths Act 1958 • Status of Children Act 1969 • Statutory Land Charges Registration A...

3. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report August 2019 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...children aged 10 to 13 Percent by gender 14.0 3.7 15.5 29.1 14.5 8.8 14.4 Causing Injury Robbery, extortion Unlawful entry, burglary Theft Property damage Public disorder Other Male (72) Female (28)Male (72) Female (28) 500 225 165 45 101 32 208 93 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 R at e Māori Pasifika European/Other Total The offending rates youth justice indicator helps us understand the proportion of young people co...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 192 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 394 KB]

   ...responsible for the email, and that Mr Johnson might have been framed. His name was presented in an unusual way in the header; the email was said to have been sent on Mr Johnson’s behalf only; and there was no sign off by Mr Johnson. [101] The assumption made in the first NZDF letter was not one which a fair and reasonable employer could be expected to make, because of the importance of starting the inquiry with an open mind. [102] Once Mr Johnson gave his denial, NZDF...

5. Bay of Plenty Regional Council Submissions - 29 November 2017 [pdf, 492 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER: AND IN THE MATTER: BETWEEN AND AND of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-000134) NGATI MAKINO HERITAGE TRUST (ENV-2015-AKL-000140) NGATI RANGINUI IWI INCORPORATED SOCIETY (ENV-2015-AKL-000141) Appellants BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent VARIOUS Section 27 4 Parties OPENING SUBMISSIONS FOR

6. Abortion Legislation Bill (Cabinet Papers) [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...and the United States. Proposal 100. I propose the inclusion of a regulation-making power, so that a safe access zone could be implemented to prevent harm to pregnant women or health practitioners accessing a specific facility. Considerations 101. Safe access zones may support equity of access to abortion services and may serve to reduce stigma experienced by women and medical practitioners, therefore supporting the provision of safe clinical care. A provision for safe access zones...

7. Director of Proceedings v Taranaki District Health Board [2021] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 613 KB]

   (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE AGGRIEVED PERSON (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL Reference No. HRRT 012/2021 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND TARANAKI DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms SJ Eyre, Deputy Chairperson Ms BL Klippel, Member Dr SJ Hickey MNZM,

8. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land

9. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land

10. [2021 NZACC 189 – CD v ACC (30 November 2021) [pdf, 578 KB]

    PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 189 ACR 234/12 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN CD Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CO