3436 items matching your search terms
IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2016] NZHRRT 38 Reference No. HRRT 032/2013 UNDER Human Rights Act 1993 BETWEEN SATNAM SINGH Plaintiff AND SHANE SINGH First Defendant AND SCORPION LIQUOR (2006) LIMITED Second Defendant AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Judge W K Hastings Deputy Chairperson Dr H Hickey, Member Pastor R Musuku, Member APPEARANCES: S Judd and D Peirse for the Plaintiff S Lance for the Defendan
...the representation he had received from Mr DL. [100] Mr DL had no involvement with the 20[XB] proceedings. It was his recollection that Mr CM had been critical of the performance of counsel who had represented him in the 20[XB] proceedings. [101] Nor do I consider that responsibility for the problems Mr CM encountered in his 20[XI] proceedings can be fairly laid at Mr DL’s door. Mr CM instructed fresh counsel in June 2018. Responsibility for conduct of the 20[XI] proceedings re...
BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 186 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent R Peters and R Bannan R Dexter and A Modrow N Smith P Lange L Whiley s 27 4 parties Court: Environment Judge M Harland Commissioner K Edmonds Commissioner D Bun
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT INTHE MAnER AND BETWEEN AND INTHEMAnER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 9 2 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal under section 58 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMMUNITY TRUST (INCORPORATED) (ENV-2016-WLG-000065) Appellant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application under section 316 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMM
JOHN EDMINSTIN v SANFORD LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 70 [6 June 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 70 EMPC 80/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JOHN EDMINSTIN Plaintiff AND SANFORD LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 12, 13, 14 and 15 December 2016, 27, 30 and 31 January, and 2 and 3 February 2017 (Heard at Invercargill, in Chambers in A
...Properties Limited v D J Freeman & Co:41 “An inexperienced client will need and be entitled to expect the solicitor to take a much broader view of the scope of his retainer and of his duties than will be the case with an experienced client.” [101] We have also been referred to the text Ethics, Professional Responsibility and The Lawyer where the following passages are relevant:42 “In the absence of clear indications that the contrary was intended, it is presumed that the...
...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-101-000100 BETWEEN MARK LEYLAND CHAPMAN Claimant AND WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT COUNCIL First Respondent AND FLORA CREATIVE LIMITED Second Respondent AND BLUEPRINT DESIGN LIMITED (REMOVED) Third Respondent AND BRIAN AND ROSEMARY COUSINS (REMOVED) Fourth Respondent AND PAUL HAMILTON CLARKE Fifth Respondent AND GRAEME BLISSETT Sixth Respondent AND PETER DAWSON (REMOVED) Seventh Respondent AND GLEN...
...Policies D.4.12, H.4.1 and H.4.3 regarding minimum flows and allocation limits, including provisions for rootstock survival water, existing drinking water supplies and domestic needs that have the potential to affect minimum flows in particular. [101] We agree that provision needs to be made for new registered drinking water supply applications that are outside these limits and we consider that these would be appropriate as non-complying activities. Replacement consents for existing...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2021-CHC-127 KI ŌTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a direct referral of proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago under s142 2 (b) of the Act by the Minister for the Environment. AND Otago Regional Council Respondent Evidence of Murray John Brass on behalf of the Director-General of Conservation / Tumuaki Ahurei