Search Results

1. Abortion Legislation Bill (Cabinet Papers) [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...and the United States. Proposal 100. I propose the inclusion of a regulation-making power, so that a safe access zone could be implemented to prevent harm to pregnant women or health practitioners accessing a specific facility. Considerations 101. Safe access zones may support equity of access to abortion services and may serve to reduce stigma experienced by women and medical practitioners, therefore supporting the provision of safe clinical care. A provision for safe access zones...

2. Director of Proceedings v Taranaki District Health Board [2021] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 613 KB]

   (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE AGGRIEVED PERSON (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL Reference No. HRRT 012/2021 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND TARANAKI DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms SJ Eyre, Deputy Chairperson Ms BL Klippel, Member Dr SJ Hickey MNZM,

3. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land

4. [2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]

   Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage NZ IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 165 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 58 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 BETWEEN POUTAMA KAITIAKI CHARITABLE TRUST (ENV-2020-AKL-158) Appellant AND HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent AND FIRST GAS LIMITED Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Māori Land

5. [2021 NZACC 189 – CD v ACC (30 November 2021) [pdf, 578 KB]

   PURSUANT TO S 160(1)(b) ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 THERE IS A SUPPRESSION ORDER FORBIDDING PUBLICATION OF THE APPELLANT’S NAME AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 189 ACR 234/12 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN CD Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CO

6. [2021] NZEmpC 35 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...approach to the choice of law in employment cases in New Zealand. The Supreme Court in that case found that, applying the choice of law approach to employment agreements, the Employment Relations Act could be applied on a case by case basis. [101] Ms Catran argued that the Employment Relations Act is imported into the Defence Act only for Civil Staff not for locally employed civilians. Instead, s 90A was said to empower the CDF to prescribe terms and conditions of employment for...

7. G v EQC [2021] CEIT-2019-0056 [pdf, 874 KB]

   ...liveliness [100] Mr G also says that the existence of liveliness in the floor of his property is evidence of earthquake damage and supports his claim to a full foundation replacement. As set out above, the evidence does not support that. [101] The floor liveliness is explicable by the lack of mechanical fixings between the piles and bearers. This is an as built detail commensurate with the age of the construction. [102] In addition, the evidence of Mr Thurlow was that the su...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 84 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Jeet Holdings Ltd [pdf, 555 KB]

   A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v JEET HOLDINGS LIMITED [2021] NZEmpC 84 [9 June 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2021] NZEmpC 84 EMPC 31/2018 IN THE MATTER OF minimum employment standards, application for declarations of breach and other orders AND IN THE MATTER OF EMPC 104/2018 EMPC 154/2018 proceedings removed

9. [2023] NZEmpC 57 New Zealand Steel Ltd v Haddad [pdf, 444 KB]

   ...27 Despite Mr Wyatt applying for both the Legacy Platform Support Manager and Platform Integration Manager roles, in this correspondence, Mr Johnson only noted him as applying for the Legacy Platform Manager role. 28 See [88] above. [101] On 15 October 2019, Mr Johnson emailed Mr Dale. He noted that there had been three applicants for the Legacy Platform Manager role, including Mr Wyatt and Mr Haddad, with CVs attached, and that there had been one applicant for the Platfor...

10. LCRO 28/2021 RW v BD and Law Firm A (3 May 2022) [pdf, 330 KB]

    ...firm that occurs at a time when he or she or it is providing regulated services and is conduct that falls short of the standard of competence and diligence that a member of the public is entitled to expect of a reasonably competent lawyer; … [101] Rule 6.1 of the Conduct and Client Care Rules provides: 6.1 A lawyer must not act for more than 1 client on a matter in any circumstances where there is a more than negligible risk that the lawyer may be unable to discharge the obligations...