Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 10 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...collected. His second was that many of the documents were about patients not treated by Ms Shaw. His third concern was that many of the documents were drafts that are not kept by the hospital as part of its record of patient treatment. [101] Mr McKelvie considered that collecting and holding this information breached the DHB’s Health Information Privacy Standards. [102] What started as a revised investigation arising from Ms Shaw’s email of July 2014 took on a differen...

2. [2021] NZACC 100 – Tutakangahau v ACC (16 July 2021) [pdf, 447 KB]

   IRENE TUTAKANGAHAU v ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION [2021] NZACC 100 [16 July 2021] IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 100 ACR 305/17 and 225/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 151 OF THE ACT BETWEEN IRENE TUTAKANGAHAU Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing

3. LCRO 196/2020 AB v CD (31 March 2021) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...AB can only fairly be measured by an assessment of what was said at the meeting. [100] It is not possible to determine, in the absence of evidence from third parties, the tone, manner, and attitude of two parties attending a private meeting. [101] At the nub of Ms AB’s complaint, is concern that Mr CD had compared her settlement proposal to blackmail. 16 [102] It was suggested by Mr CD that her proposal fell within the legal definition of blackmail. [103] I consider that M...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 192 E Tū Inc v Rasier Operations BV [pdf, 483 KB]

   ...Worldwide (NZ) Ltd the Employment Court had held that the putative employer bore the onus of displacing a presumption of employment status for the purposes of s 6.34 The Court of Appeal took a different view, observing that:35 30 At [93]-[101]. Note that it has been suggested that on the case’s findings of fact it is arguable that the drivers were employees: McGaughey, above n 24. Note too that a Bill is now before the House of Lords to remove the distinction between “worke...

5. Adoption-reform-Summary-of-engagement-2022.pdf [pdf, 499 KB]

   Adoption Law Reform Summary of feedback on 2022 engagement November 2022 Version number Date 2 Contents Background ......................................................................................................................... 4 Engagement on options for a new adoption system .......................................................... 4 Process related to engagement on whāngai .............................................................

6. Appendix-10_Michael-Thompson_s87F-Report_Water-Take-and-Allocation_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 893 KB]

   Section 87F Report – Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by Michael Thompson – Water take and allocation 1 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of applications by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) to Manawatū-Whanganui Regional Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council for resource consents to enable the construction, operation and maintenance of new state highway, shared

7. 18.-Evidence-of-Dr-Alex-James-Freshwater-Ecology.PDF [PDF, 633 KB]

   Barristers and Solicitors Wellington Solicitor Acting: David Allen / Thaddeus Ryan Email: david.allen@buddlefindlay.com / thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource co

8. Houghton v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2024] NZACC 57 [pdf, 361 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 57 ACR 251/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ANDREW HOUGHTON Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 21 June 2023 Further evidence/ submissions filed: Appellant 18 July 2023 Respondent 25 July 2023 Heard at: Christchurch Appearances: Mr K Murray for appella

9. MOJ0504-Making-parenting-arrangements-workbook-Hindi.pdf [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...91: Weekly plan - Name 92: Weekly plan - Name 93: Weekly plan - Name 94: Weekly plan - Name 95: Weekly plan - Name 96: Weekly plan - Name 97: Weekly plan - Name 98: Weekly plan - Name 99: Weekly plan - Name 100: Weekly plan - Name 101: Weekly plan - Name 102: Weekly plan - Name 103: Weekly plan - Name 104: Weekly plan - Name 105: Text Field 3: Text Field 4: Text Field 5: Text Field 6: Text Field 7: Text Field 8: Text Field 9: Text Field 10: Text Fie...

10. LCRO 35/2024 UX v RT (19 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

    ...If she was unsure she should check with myself and my husband first before she started any work. We were buying property and it is not unusual for a buyer to look at several different properties before he/she chooses the right property. … [101] I have checked the two addresses. As a result, I consider the applicant’s statement to be both incorrect and mischievous. Her statement that the two apartments were “…in two different areas in [City]…” is false. They are a short...