Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 186 Panuku Development Auckland Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   BEFORETHEEN~RONMENTCOURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 186 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent R Peters and R Bannan R Dexter and A Modrow N Smith P Lange L Whiley s 27 4 parties Court: Environment Judge M Harland Commissioner K Edmonds Commissioner D Bun

2. [2017] NZEnvC 092 Golden Bay Grandstand v Heritage New Zealand [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT INTHE MAnER AND BETWEEN AND INTHEMAnER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 9 2 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal under section 58 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMMUNITY TRUST (INCORPORATED) (ENV-2016-WLG-000065) Appellant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application under section 316 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMM

3. [2017] NZEmpC 70 Edminstin v Sanford Limited [pdf, 515 KB]

   JOHN EDMINSTIN v SANFORD LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 70 [6 June 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2017] NZEmpC 70 EMPC 80/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN JOHN EDMINSTIN Plaintiff AND SANFORD LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 12, 13, 14 and 15 December 2016, 27, 30 and 31 January, and 2 and 3 February 2017 (Heard at Invercargill, in Chambers in A

4. Canterbury / Westland Standards Committee 3 v Johnson [2018] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 464 KB]

   ...Properties Limited v D J Freeman & Co:41 “An inexperienced client will need and be entitled to expect the solicitor to take a much broader view of the scope of his retainer and of his duties than will be the case with an experienced client.” [101] We have also been referred to the text Ethics, Professional Responsibility and The Lawyer where the following passages are relevant:42 “In the absence of clear indications that the contrary was intended, it is presumed that the...

5. October 2020 Notification of Applications in Office of Chief Registrar [pdf, 573 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

6. Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 364 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-101-000100 BETWEEN MARK LEYLAND CHAPMAN Claimant AND WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT COUNCIL First Respondent AND FLORA CREATIVE LIMITED Second Respondent AND BLUEPRINT DESIGN LIMITED (REMOVED) Third Respondent AND BRIAN AND ROSEMARY COUSINS (REMOVED) Fourth Respondent AND PAUL HAMILTON CLARKE Fifth Respondent AND GRAEME BLISSETT Sixth Respondent AND PETER DAWSON (REMOVED) Seventh Respondent AND GLEN...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 001 Minister of Conservation v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...Policies D.4.12, H.4.1 and H.4.3 regarding minimum flows and allocation limits, including provisions for rootstock survival water, existing drinking water supplies and domestic needs that have the potential to affect minimum flows in particular. [101] We agree that provision needs to be made for new registered drinking water supply applications that are outside these limits and we consider that these would be appropriate as non-complying activities. Replacement consents for existing...

8. D-G Conservation - EiC - M J Brass - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 455 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2021-CHC-127 KI ŌTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 of a direct referral of proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago under s142 2 (b) of the Act by the Minister for the Environment. AND Otago Regional Council Respondent Evidence of Murray John Brass on behalf of the Director-General of Conservation / Tumuaki Ahurei

9. Hutcheson v Clarkson - Mangamaire B No 2 Block (2020) 86 Takitimu MB 283 (86 TKT-283) [pdf, 379 KB]

   86 Tākitimu MB 283 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20150001866 A20160005018 WĀHANGA Under Sections 67, 238 and 240 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Mangamaire B No 2 Block I WAENGA I A Between ME And JAMES ROBERT HUTCHESON Te Kaitono Applicant CATHERINE CLARKSON, KETTEPUNGA CLARKSON, SH

10. [2020] NZEnvC 104 Lindis Catchment Group Incorporated v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 3.7 MB]

    ...Lindis Ribbon Aquifer) 2008.361.V1 28 Aug .05 5 Longacre Lindis River 151 2028 Station ("Timburn (including Limited Tim Burn Race") 99062.V1 1 Oct take29 of 28 2021 1/s from take point 6) 99022.V1 1 Oct .06 5 Timburn Lindis River 101 2021 Limited 2001.807.V2 1 Oct .07 T1-T4 Lindis Lindis 96 2021 (replacing Irrigation Ribbon Tarras Race) Limited Aquifer (Bores)31 A1-A9 27932 2001.809V1 1 Oct (replacing 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 1 32 202130 Ardgour...