3376 items matching your search terms
168 Taitokerau MB 17 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130006483 UNDER Section 326B, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mangamuka West 3B2A Block BETWEEN NGAWAI TUSON Applicant Hearing: 20 November 2013 17 November 2014 4 May 2015 (Heard at Kaitaia) Judgment: 23 February 2018 PRELIMINARY DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE FOX 1
...[nationality] solicitors to Mr JM dated 9 October 20XX. No invoice accompanied the email. There was simply a breakdown of the fee in the body of the email and directions as to how and where it was to be paid. Scope of retainer: conclusions [101] Under the Rules, a lawyer is required to provide their client, in writing, with the terms of their retainer.11 Having done so, the existence of the retainer is confirmed. [102] In Lawyers’ Professional Responsibility, the learned author...
...perform any minor unrecorded proactive, preventative or unremunerated duties during on-call periods; nor did they have ongoing responsibility for the wellbeing of groups of vulnerable people during the periods of time that they were on call. [101] I return to the point which I made earlier, to the effect that a practical assessment is required, which is, inevitably, case-specific. [102] In this case, the nature and extent of the responsibilities during periods of call-back wa...
...bargaining, when initiated by a union, would automatically act as a veto over management prerogative as may be exercised under an existing CEA. 7 Clause 8.2.2. Individual bargaining [101] In terms of Mr Cranney’s submission that there are, potentially, three means by which variations of individual terms can be effected where there is a collective agreement on foot, I consider that the present circumstances fall within t...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEARAROA Court: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN Decision No. [20171 NZEnvC 216 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for declarations pursuant to section 311 of the Act MACKENZIE DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2017 -CHC-70) Applicant Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Commissioner J R Mills Hearing: at Christchurch on 25 October 2017 Final submissions received 10 November 2017 Appearanc
...made to the private investigator and his enquiries aimed at verifying the financial position of Mr HG and related entities. Counsel contends that the protections provided by rule 8.8 do not apply in the circumstances of Mr HG’s complaint. [101] Counsel also addressed the “numerous additional assertions and allegations”50 made by Mr HG in the course of his dealings with Ms PR, and the complaint process. Counsel says proceedings were issued because Mr HG did not take up the...
...considered this impairment to be permanent. [100] There is an initial medical assessment (11 May 2009) from Dr Randall Sturm. The diagnosis was of chronic pain syndrome. In the doctor’s opinion, no type of work was medically sustainable. [101] Dr Chris Beer (16 June 2014) noted that there had been significant post- operation infections in the early records. He discussed with Mr de Waal how severe inflammation might have affected him. CASE ON APPEAL [102] Mr de Waal or...
JAN MATUKU MLC A2007001203 15 January 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 245 AOTEA MB 15 A20070001203 UNDER Section 216, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Ngati Maru Wharanui Pukehou Trust JAN MATUKU Applicant Hearing: 188 Aotea MB 159, 15 June 2007 195 Aotea MB 80, 19 October 2007 198 Aotea MB 178, 13 December 2007 202 Aotea MB 48-57, 5 March 2008 205 Aotea MB 136, 15 May 2008 214 Aotea MB 130, 21
CLAIM NO: 376 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JANICE LORRAINE and NOEL EWART HILL Claimants AND DIANNE and ROSS WHIMP First Respondents AND AKITA CONSTRUCTION LTD Second Respondent AND EUROBRIK PRODUCTS LTD Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent, Jeff Young Contractors Ltd having been struck out AND No Fifth Respondent, David John Follas having been struck out AND No Sixth Respon
...respective reservations and comments about the appellant’s prognosis, Dr Gluckman did not draw any conclusion as to the appellant’s present physical symptoms, except in the context of the appellant having been off work in the previous nine months. [101] Dr Gluckman attributed the genesis of the appellant’s problems to his relationship with his father as a child, but his drinking as a young man and his financial difficulties after he married were also contributors. Dr Gluckman did...