Search Results

Search results for 101.

3434 items matching your search terms

  1. PR v HG 69/2016 LCRO [pdf, 269 KB]

    ...made to the private investigator and his enquiries aimed at verifying the financial position of Mr HG and related entities. Counsel contends that the protections provided by rule 8.8 do not apply in the circumstances of Mr HG’s complaint. [101] Counsel also addressed the “numerous additional assertions and allegations”50 made by Mr HG in the course of his dealings with Ms PR, and the complaint process. Counsel says proceedings were issued because Mr HG did not take up the...

  2. Waal v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACA 05 [pdf, 291 KB]

    ...considered this impairment to be permanent. [100] There is an initial medical assessment (11 May 2009) from Dr Randall Sturm. The diagnosis was of chronic pain syndrome. In the doctor’s opinion, no type of work was medically sustainable. [101] Dr Chris Beer (16 June 2014) noted that there had been significant post- operation infections in the early records. He discussed with Mr de Waal how severe inflammation might have affected him. CASE ON APPEAL [102] Mr de Waal or...

  3. Matuku Ngati Maru Wharanui Pukehou Trust (2009) 245 Aotea MB 15 (245 AOT 15) [pdf, 306 KB]

    JAN MATUKU MLC A2007001203 15 January 2010 IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 245 AOTEA MB 15 A20070001203 UNDER Section 216, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Ngati Maru Wharanui Pukehou Trust JAN MATUKU Applicant Hearing: 188 Aotea MB 159, 15 June 2007 195 Aotea MB 80, 19 October 2007 198 Aotea MB 178, 13 December 2007 202 Aotea MB 48-57, 5 March 2008 205 Aotea MB 136, 15 May 2008 214 Aotea MB 130, 21

  4. Hill v Whimp [pdf, 158 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 376 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JANICE LORRAINE and NOEL EWART HILL Claimants AND DIANNE and ROSS WHIMP First Respondents AND AKITA CONSTRUCTION LTD Second Respondent AND EUROBRIK PRODUCTS LTD Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent, Jeff Young Contractors Ltd having been struck out AND No Fifth Respondent, David John Follas having been struck out AND No Sixth Respon

  5. B v ACC [2012] NZACA 5 [pdf, 127 KB]

    ...respective reservations and comments about the appellant’s prognosis, Dr Gluckman did not draw any conclusion as to the appellant’s present physical symptoms, except in the context of the appellant having been off work in the previous nine months. [101] Dr Gluckman attributed the genesis of the appellant’s problems to his relationship with his father as a child, but his drinking as a young man and his financial difficulties after he married were also contributors. Dr Gluckman did...

  6. 2014 to 2018 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 2.4 MB]

    Statement of intent 2014–2018 E.64 SOI (2014) 1 Introduction from the Minister of Justice 2 Introduction from the Chief Executive 4 Who we are Our responsibilities Who we work with 6 Our operating environment Government priorities Sector priorities 8 What we want to achieve Our business strategy Our performance framework 10 What we will do Safer communities A fairer and more responsive justice system The integrity of our institutions is maintained

  7. 2015 to 2019 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 952 KB]

    E.64 SOI (2015) Statement of intent 2015–2019 Ministry of Justice DRAFT 2 DRAFT 3 Contents Introduction from the Minister of Justice .................................................................................................. 4 Introduction from the Chief Executive ...................................................................................................... 6 Our story...............................................................

  8. Waitangi Tribunal - Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi as expressed by the Courts and the Waitangi Tribunal [pdf, 190 KB]

    74 HE TIROHANGA Ö KAWA KI TE TIRITI O WAITANGI Introduction This section of the guide elaborates principles of the Treaty expressed by the Courts and the Waitangi Tribunal in the context of particular cases and claims. It begins with a brief explanation of why legislative references to the Treaty refer to its principles and also offers an overview of the different jurisdictions of the Courts and the Tribunal as well as their understanding of what principles signify. Some earlier compila

  9. [2017] NZEmpC 71 Stormont v Peddle Thorp Aitken Ltd [pdf, 497 KB]

    CATHERINE STORMONT v PEDDLE THORP AITKEN LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 71 [6 June 2017] ATTENTION IS DRAWN TO THE NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS REFERRED TO AT [129] OF THIS JUDGMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 71 EMPC 48/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CATHERINE STORMONT Plaintiff AND PEDDLE THORP AITKEN LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18-26 Octo

  10. LCRO 85/2016 BA v FE [pdf, 280 KB]

    ...legal fees have now been paid. However, this does not prevent Miss BA from raising complaint about those fees. Separation Order [100] Legal fees associated with this aspect of Mr FE’s retainer, were $5,214.00, plus GST and disbursements. [101] Initially Mr FE advised Miss BA that applications of that nature are unusual and something of a relic from a bygone era, as parties generally reach agreement about when they separated and incorporate that date in their overall property ag...