3476 items matching your search terms
Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000060 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 21 BETWEEN CHUN HEE RYANG Claimant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL (FORMERLY NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL) First Respondent AND DAVID LEE Second Respondent AND THEOTESTO REYES Third Respondent AND PLASTER DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND PATON ROOFING SERVICES LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND WISE & ASSOCIATES LIMITED Sixth Respondent AND RUSSELL MATTHEWS
2013 Maori Appellate Court 528 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20120013041 APPEAL 2012/10 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an order of the Māori Land Court made on 3 May 2012 at 282 Aotea MB 75 in respect of Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and 55B1A2 (Manu Ariki Marae) BETWEEN BEVERLY MURAAHI and FAITH BARLOW Appellants AND TEINA PHILLIPS First Respondent AND TE KOTAHI
2013 Māori Appellate Court MB 243 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAKITIMU DISTRICT A20120007050 APPEAL 2012/4 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal by Hōhepa Mei Tatere and Te Aroha Edwards, against orders of the Māori Land Court made on 29 March 2012 at 15 Takitimu MB 4-14 and on 4 April 2012 at 15 Takitimu MB 203-221 in respect of Mangatāinoka No 1BC No 2C, Tāmaki 2A2A (Balance) also known as Ngaw
CLAIM NO: 00499 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN PETER WILLIAM GRAY and SUSAN FRANCES GRAY Claimants AND TULIP HOLDINGS LIMITED First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 8 & 9 November 2005 Appearances: Grant Shand for the Claimants No appearance by or on behalf of the First respondent John Bierre and Andrew Wedekind for the Fifth respondent Det
Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000043 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 36 BETWEEN ANTHONY AND ANGELA DAWSON Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL (formerly known as NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL) First Respondent AND OSBORNE PRICE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Second Respondent AND MARK AND JOANN-LEE FULLER Third Respondents AND GREG PAUL THOMAS (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND IAN BLACK Fifth Respondent AND BARNEY CORNAGA Sixth Respond
[2017] NZSSAA 020 Reference No. SSA 147/13 and SSA 055/16 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY This decision is subject to an order directing that the location where the hearing took place, the names of witnesses, counsel, and the parties and where they live are not to be published, as that informati
168 Taitokerau MB 17 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20130006483 UNDER Section 326B, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Mangamuka West 3B2A Block BETWEEN NGAWAI TUSON Applicant Hearing: 20 November 2013 17 November 2014 4 May 2015 (Heard at Kaitaia) Judgment: 23 February 2018 PRELIMINARY DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE FOX 1
...[nationality] solicitors to Mr JM dated 9 October 20XX. No invoice accompanied the email. There was simply a breakdown of the fee in the body of the email and directions as to how and where it was to be paid. Scope of retainer: conclusions [101] Under the Rules, a lawyer is required to provide their client, in writing, with the terms of their retainer.11 Having done so, the existence of the retainer is confirmed. [102] In Lawyers’ Professional Responsibility, the learned author...
...perform any minor unrecorded proactive, preventative or unremunerated duties during on-call periods; nor did they have ongoing responsibility for the wellbeing of groups of vulnerable people during the periods of time that they were on call. [101] I return to the point which I made earlier, to the effect that a practical assessment is required, which is, inevitably, case-specific. [102] In this case, the nature and extent of the responsibilities during periods of call-back wa...
...bargaining, when initiated by a union, would automatically act as a veto over management prerogative as may be exercised under an existing CEA. 7 Clause 8.2.2. Individual bargaining [101] In terms of Mr Cranney’s submission that there are, potentially, three means by which variations of individual terms can be effected where there is a collective agreement on foot, I consider that the present circumstances fall within t...