Search Results

1. LCRO 85/2016 BA v FE [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...legal fees have now been paid. However, this does not prevent Miss BA from raising complaint about those fees. Separation Order [100] Legal fees associated with this aspect of Mr FE’s retainer, were $5,214.00, plus GST and disbursements. [101] Initially Mr FE advised Miss BA that applications of that nature are unusual and something of a relic from a bygone era, as parties generally reach agreement about when they separated and incorporate that date in their overall property ag...

2. [2018] NZEnvC 133 Director General of Conservation v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 17 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 13 3 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2016-AKL-000149) Appellant THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Principal Environment Judge LJ Newhook Environment Comm

3. [2016] NZEmpC 166 Alim v Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 537 KB]

   SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 166 [14 December 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 166 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs AND IN THE MATTER of an application for joinder BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Defendant AND PRI FLIGHT CATERING LIMITED S

4. BORA Immigration Bill [pdf, 480 KB]

   ...by virtue of a warrant of commitment is also a positive development and provides the judge with greater discretion to ensure that a person’s liberty should only be restricted or deprived to the extent necessary in respect of a particular case. 101. However, we note that the judge in a warrant of commitment hearing may only securely detain or release on conditions (clause 279(2)). The possibility of release without conditions is not explicitly mentioned. This is problematic as it may b...

5. Proprietors of Potikirua Block Incorporated v Te Kani - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 8212 [2013] Chief Judge's MB 82 (2013 CJ 82) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Failing (i), to lease Wharekahika A 15 to Wamoana Te Kani; iii) Failing (i) and (ii) Wharekahika is to be returned to Potikirua Incorporation for farming, with the house or area of section remaining with Wamoana Te Kani. 2013 Chief Judge's MS 101 The letter then went on to state that 'notice of intention to partition must be in writing to Potikirua Incorporation will be advertised in Public notices in local newspaper prior to AGM'[sic.] 34. Lastly, a note from a &#03...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 052 Rangitane O Tamaki v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATIER OF Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 52 appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITANE O TAMAIZI NUI-A­ RUA INCORPORATED AND AND (ENV-2019-WLG-000018) JOHN BENT (ENV-2019-WLG-000019) Appellants :MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Environment Judge BP Dwyer

7. December-2020-Notification-of-Applications-in-Office-of-Chief-Registrar.pdf [pdf, 559 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

8. January Coo Applications [pdf, 552 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

9. LCRO 98/2019 EL v SV, DV & JV (31 March 2021) [pdf, 510 KB]

   ...would mean that, with each invoice he issued, the Vs would be obliged to make a fresh complaint. [100] This would be a triumph of form over substance, at odds with a complaints system requiring fairness, efficiency and expedition.18 Analysis [101] I have identified the following issues for determination by me: (a) Was Mr EL providing regulated services when carrying out the administration of Mr OM’s estate? (b) If so, do any issues of competence arise in relation to Mr EL’...

10. DV, RL, YS and TB v AR LCRO 316/2013 [pdf, 228 KB]

    ...clients. Whilst the Committee clearly drew comfort from that assurance, the Committee does not directly address the issue as to whether Mr AW was entitled to make the process of accounting to his clients conditional upon the liquidator’s opinion. [101] I will address each of Mr AW’s explanations for his decision not to release funds in turn. 24 Delay in obtaining information from the liquidator [102] At the conclusion of the substantive proceedings in 2009, Mr AW was i...