3475 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 011/2011 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN JALESI NAKARAWA PLAINTIFF AND AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED DEFENDANT AT HAMILTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms PJ Davies, Member Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr MD Benefield for Plaintiff Ms ME Wilson for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 19 December 2011 DATE OF LAST SUBMISSIONS: 28 Nov
GO BUS TRANSPORT LIMITED v KEVIN HELLYER NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY [2016] NZEmpC 177 [23 December 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY [2016] NZEmpC 177 EMPC 291/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN GO BUS TRANSPORT LIMITED Plaintiff AND KEVIN HELLYER Defendant Hearing: 18 August and 5 October 2016 (Heard at Dunedin) Appearances: A Toohey, cou
...Respondent Statement of evidence of Darryl Sycamore 24 February 2017 Respondent's solicitors: Michael Garbett Anderson Lloyd Level 10, Otago House, 477 Moray Place, Dunedin 9016 Private Bag 1959, Dunedin 9054 DX Box YX10107 Dunedin p + 64 3 477 3973 | f + 64 3 477 3184 michael.garbett@al.nz 2522007 page 1 Introduction 1 My name is Darryl Allan Sycamore. 2 I am a Planner at the Dunedin City Council (Council) and have held this position
IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIIUTO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT Hearing: 134 W AIIU TO MB 3 A20060026843 A20060002649 IN THE MATTER OF Hauturu East 8 Block AND An application for review oftrust UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 AND UNDER RUAPUHA UEKAHA HAPU TRUST Applicant An application for enforcement of obligations of trust and review of trust Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 NORMANTANE Applicant 16 October 2007, 127 Waikato MB 259-3
2017 Chief Judge’s MB 269 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20070002188 CJ 2007/007 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF RANGIWAEA-TĀPIRI (Formerly known as RANGIPŌ NORTH 8) – Application to Chief Judge BETWEEN RANGI BRISTOL, AIDEN GILBERT & MATIU HAITANA Applicants AND NGĀTI RANGI TRUST Respondent Hearings: 302 Aotea MB 51-64, dated 29 April 2013 326 Aotea MB 165-238, dated 25 August
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 0 4- b of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an inquiry under clauses 14(1) and 15(3) of Schedule 1 to the Act FRIENDS OF NELSON HAVEN AND TASMAN BAY INCORPORATED (ENV-2017 -WLG-00001 0) Appellant TASMAN DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent WAINUI SPAT CATCHING GROUP Applicant JILL/AN RUTH FOXWELL FRIENDS OF GOLDEN BAY SOCIETY (I NCORPORA
...residences, but will not exceed 60dB LAFmax. Dr Trevathan considered that predicted noise levels from the operation of the quarry would not cause any adverse effects on the amenity of neighbouring residents that was more than minor. 5 NOE page 101. 10 [30] Dealing specifically with noise from vehicles received at 1072 Takaka Valley Road (Ms Price's property), Dr Trevathan considered that the measured noise level from existing daytime traffic of around 60dB LAeq would mask...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC I ~ f IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN GRATTAN INVESTMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000009) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick Date of Decision: 1 0 AUG 2018 Date of Issue: 1 0: AUG 2018 DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The Court orders, by consent,
MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND INC v THE CHINA NAVIGATION COMPANY PTE. LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 111 [22 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 111 EMPC 187/2016 IN THE MATTER OF an application for declarations and injunction BETWEEN MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND INC First Plaintiff AND HARRY VETE AND THOSE PERSONS LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE TO THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM Second Plaintiffs AND THE CHINA N
...letters to this Office dated 8 April and 2 May 2014. [100] In general terms Mr EB relies upon the responses that he provided to the Committee in answering the Ds’ complaint, as well as the Committee’s reasoning in its decision. 20 [101] In relation to the complaint that he did not obtain full copies of Mrs FD’s files from her former lawyers, Mr EB said that he obtained those files promptly — that is, within six weeks of her death on [date]. The executors were not s...