Search Results

1. Directory of Official Information D-F [pdf, 993 KB]

   ...review reports • National education evaluation reports Documents relating to decision-making processes ERO’s Code of Conduct and other operational documents are available on our website: www.ero.govt.nz. Contact National Office Level 1, 101 Lambton Quay Wellington 6011 PO Box 2799 Wellington 6140 Phone 04 499 2489 info@ero.govt.nz www.ero.govt.nz http://www.ero.govt.nz/ mailto:info@ero.govt.nz http://www.ero.govt.nz/ 27 Electricity Authority Entry las...

2. Directory of Official Information D-F [pdf, 1004 KB]

   ...review reports • National education evaluation reports Documents relating to decision-making processes ERO’s Code of Conduct and other operational documents are available on our website: www.ero.govt.nz. Contact National Office Level 1, 101 Lambton Quay Wellington 6011 PO Box 2799 Wellington 6140 Phone 04 499 2489 info@ero.govt.nz www.ero.govt.nz http://www.ero.govt.nz/ mailto:info@ero.govt.nz http://www.ero.govt.nz/ 30 Electricity Authority Entry las...

3. [2023] NZEmpC 56 Te Whatu Ora – Health New Zealand v Public Service Association, Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi [pdf, 471 KB]

   ...it be the employees or the employer, are held to the same high standard of good faith bargaining. It also provides an option for any issues relating to the claim to be referred either to mediation or to the Employment Relations Authority. [101] There was no express reference in the Bill to the possibility of industrial action in respect of a pay equity claim. [102] The Bill was read for the first time in early 2018 after Labour had assumed the government benches in late 2017. T...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 118 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association v Board of Trustees for Rodney College [pdf, 519 KB]

   ...available to the plaintiff at the time and therefore is only evidence of subjective intent. Accordingly, I do not attribute that material with relevance for the purposes of establishing a shared intention as part of this interpretive exercise. [101] That said, it is not disputed that the 1996 STCEC claim from the SSC was that 10 days (later negotiated to five days) would be taken from vacation time and it was well known that this claw-back of holidays was an important claim for th...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 117 High Quality v Auckland Council [pdf, 885 KB]

   ...policies of the Plan. 4 Environmental Defence Society Inc v New Zealand King Salmon Company Ltd [2014] NZDC 38, (2014) 17 ELRNZ 442, [2014] 1 NZLR 593, [2014] NZRMA 195. 5 Albert Road Investments v Auckland Council [2018] NZEnvC 102. [100] [101] [102] [103] 25 Precedent and plan integrity As we noted earlier, we do not consider this case to be one of high principle. The activity is discretionary. The weight of the relevant objectives and policies and the zoning pro...

6. Directory of Official Information D-F [pdf, 989 KB]

   ...review reports • National education evaluation reports Documents relating to decision-making processes ERO’s Code of Conduct and other operational documents are available on our website: www.ero.govt.nz. Contact National Office Level 1, 101 Lambton Quay Wellington 6011 PO Box 2799 Wellington 6140 Phone 04 499 2489 info@ero.govt.nz www.ero.govt.nz mailto:info@ero.govt.nz http://www.ero.govt.nz/ 30 Electricity Authority Entry last updated on 12 January...

7. Director of Proceedings v IDEA Services Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 690 KB]

   ...defendant’s requirements for reporting and responding to incidents and near misses, with an aim to make sure all such events are: responded to quickly and appropriately; reported; recorded; and that external authorities are notified where required. 101. With respect to responding to incidents and near misses, and reporting and recording incidents and near misses, the policy states: 1. RESPONDING TO INCIDENTS AND NEAR MISSES 1.1 Immediate Action to Take Following an Incident or...

8. [2021] NZACC 126 - Botha v ACC (4 August 2021) [pdf, 534 KB]

   TIN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 126 ACR 143/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KEVIN BOTHA Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 June 2021 Heard at: Wellington/Whanganui-A-Tara Appearances: Ms B Peck for the appellant Mr S Bisley and Mr L Kibblewhite for the resp

9. NZCVS Cycle 3 (2020) Section 7 Distribution of crime [xlsx, 186 KB]

   ...None 2,781 70.36 – – 2,794 69.47 – – 2,913 70.74 – – One 730 18.47 62.30 27.83 775 19.27 63.13 29.62 761 18.49 63.21 30.52 Two 225 5.70 19.23 16.54 229 5.70 18.67 18.29 219 5.32 18.18 16.30 Three 84 2.12 7.16 10.06 101 # 2.51 ‡ 8.22 ‡ 12.13 ‡ 86 # 2.08 ‡ 7.12 ‡ 9.78 ‡ Four 40 # 1.02 ‡ 3.43 ‡ 6.54 ‡ 41 # 1.02 ‡ 3.33 ‡ 6.73 ‡ 56 # 1.35 ‡ 4.63 ‡ 9.95 ‡ Five or more 92 2.34 7.89 39.03 ‡ 82 # 2.03...

10. LCRO 149/2020 WM v VE and DP (14 December 2021) [pdf, 361 KB]

    ...shareholders/directors, to provide the company’s instructions to Mr VE and Mr DP. He says the proposed restructure of the company was not in the company’s best interests and there had been no directors’ resolution providing that authority. [101] Mr VE and Mr DP say from mid-2017, Mr IQ was the company’s director authorised to provide the company’s legal instructions to the firm. They say it was not necessary for the directors to resolve unanimously to provide that authorit...