Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 63 Rooney Earthmoving Ltd v McTague Whiting and Bartlet [pdf, 304 KB]

   ROONEY EARTHMOVING LTD V KELVIN DOUGLAS MCTAGUE NZEmpC CHCH [2012] NZEmpC 63 [23 April 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2012] NZEmpC 63 CRC 21/07 IN THE MATTER OF a de novo challenge BETWEEN ROONEY EARTHMOVING LTD Plaintiff AND KELVIN DOUGLAS MCTAGUE First Defendant AND CLARENCE HENRY WHITING Second Defendant AND KERRY WAYNE BARTLETT Third Defendant Hearing: 21-24 and 29 June 2011 (Heard at Ashburton) And by submissions

2. [2012] NZEmpC 95 Strachan v Moodie [pdf, 323 KB]

   ELIZABETH GRACE STRACHAN V ROBERT ALEXANDER MOODIE (ALSO KNOWN AS "MISS ALICE") TRADING AS MOODIE & CO, A LAW FIRM NZEmpC WN [2012] NZEmpC 95 [14 June 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2012] NZEmpC 95 WRC 16/09 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ELIZABETH GRACE STRACHAN Plaintiff AND ROBERT ALEXANDER MOODIE (ALSO KNOWN AS "MISS ALICE") TRADING AS MOODIE & CO, A LAW F

3. [2006] NZEmpC WC 13/06 Griffith v Sunbeam Corp Ltd [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...this letter, Sunbeam’s solicitors wrote to Mr Griffith’s solicitors asking that Mr Griffith obtain from Telecom a record of calls made from his home telephone on 12 September 2003. Mr Griffith’s solicitors agreed that he would do this. [101] On 6 May 2004, Mr Griffith’s solicitors sent a fax to Sunbeam’s solicitors attaching a handwritten note signed by Mr Griffith. This said: Time in receptionist’s letter 25/9/03 of 9.30am is incorrect. First telephone call to th...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 157 Labour Inspector v Cypress Villas Ltd full court [pdf, 515 KB]

   LABOUR INSPECTOR (MELISSA ANN MACRURY) v CYPRESS VILLAS LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 157 [16 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 157 ARC 31/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN LABOUR INSPECTOR (MELISSA ANN MACRURY) Plaintiff AND CYPRESS VILLAS LIMITED Defendant AND BARRY EDWARD BRILL Proposed Second Defendant Hearing: 1

5. Wright v Ngamoki-Cameron - Heretatua (manu on the Tītī Island of Taukihepa) [2015] Chief Judge's MB 108 (2015 CJ 108) [pdf, 475 KB]

   2015 Chief Judge’s MB 108 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE WAIPOUNAMU DISTRICT A20100008103 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Heretatua (manu on the Tītī Island of Taukihepa) BETWEEN ELIZABETH SARAH WRIGHT Applicant AND CARL NGAMOKI-CAMERON Respondent UNDER IN THE MATTER OF Section 43, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 Aperahama Hutoitoi BETWEEN CARL NGA

6. Baker v Paora - Te Tii Waitangi B3 (2015) 113 Taitokerau MB 31 (113 TTK 31) [pdf, 1 MB]

   113 Taitokerau MB 31 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20090015424 A20100004537 UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii Waitangi B3 BETWEEN MARYANNE BAKER Applicant A20150002058 UNDER Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 AND BETWEEN WAIRETI PAORA Applicant Hearing: 20 August 2015 (Heard at Kaik

7. [2013] NZEmpC 155 Clark v Idea Services Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

   WILLIAM STUART CLARK v IDEA SERVICES LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 155 [16 August 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 155 CRC 22/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN WILLIAM STUART CLARK Plaintiff AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27-29 June 2011 (Heard at Invercargill) Appearances: Damien Pine and Jessie

8. [2015] NZEmpC 34 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

   DAVID RODKISS v CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 34 [24 March 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 34 CRC 52/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DAVID RODKISS Plaintiff AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 19, 20, 21, 22 August and 28, 29, 30, 31 October 2014 and submissions filed on 5 and 14 November 201

9. Wellington Standards Committee v Hall [2014] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...implications before giving any consent.31 [100] If she was acting for more than one party to the transaction, and the interests of those parties were in conflict or likely to be in conflict, then the requirements of r 1.07 also applied to Ms Hall. [101] The requirements of r 1.04 are straightforward. Prior informed consent is to be obtained if acting for more than one party in the same transaction. Seeking informed consent does not allow r 1.07 to be ignored if a conflict is likely...

10. [2016] NZEmpC 48 Nelson v Katavich [pdf, 290 KB]

    MIA NELSON v TONY WAYNE KATAVICH NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 48 [3 May 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 48 CRC 13/2013 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MIA NELSON Plaintiff AND TONY WAYNE KATAVICH First Defendant AND HALDEMAN LLC Second Defendant Hearing: 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 September 2015 and 14, 15, 16 and 17 March 2016 (