Search Results

Search results for 101.

3434 items matching your search terms

  1. Baker v Paora - Te Tii Waitangi B3 (2015) 113 Taitokerau MB 31 (113 TTK 31) [pdf, 1 MB]

    113 Taitokerau MB 31 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT A20090015424 A20100004537 UNDER Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii Waitangi B3 BETWEEN MARYANNE BAKER Applicant A20150002058 UNDER Section 238, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 AND BETWEEN WAIRETI PAORA Applicant Hearing: 20 August 2015 (Heard at Kaik

  2. [2013] NZEmpC 155 Clark v Idea Services Ltd [pdf, 270 KB]

    WILLIAM STUART CLARK v IDEA SERVICES LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 155 [16 August 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 155 CRC 22/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN WILLIAM STUART CLARK Plaintiff AND IDEA SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27-29 June 2011 (Heard at Invercargill) Appearances: Damien Pine and Jessie

  3. [2015] NZEmpC 34 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 349 KB]

    DAVID RODKISS v CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 34 [24 March 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 34 CRC 52/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DAVID RODKISS Plaintiff AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 19, 20, 21, 22 August and 28, 29, 30, 31 October 2014 and submissions filed on 5 and 14 November 201

  4. Wellington Standards Committee v Hall [2014] NZLCDT 1 [pdf, 263 KB]

    ...implications before giving any consent.31 [100] If she was acting for more than one party to the transaction, and the interests of those parties were in conflict or likely to be in conflict, then the requirements of r 1.07 also applied to Ms Hall. [101] The requirements of r 1.04 are straightforward. Prior informed consent is to be obtained if acting for more than one party in the same transaction. Seeking informed consent does not allow r 1.07 to be ignored if a conflict is likely...

  5. [2016] NZEmpC 48 Nelson v Katavich [pdf, 290 KB]

    MIA NELSON v TONY WAYNE KATAVICH NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 48 [3 May 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 48 CRC 13/2013 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MIA NELSON Plaintiff AND TONY WAYNE KATAVICH First Defendant AND HALDEMAN LLC Second Defendant Hearing: 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 September 2015 and 14, 15, 16 and 17 March 2016 (

  6. Auckland District Law Society v Dorbu [2010] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 217 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2010] NZLCDT 9 LCDT 026/09, 04/09 IN THE MATTER of the Law Practitioners Act 1982 BETWEEN AUCKLAND DISTRICT LAW SOCIETY Applicant AND JOHN DORBU Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms J Gray Ms C Rowe Ms M Scholtens QC Mr W Smith HEARING at AUCKLAND on 9-13 and 16-20 November 2009

  7. Watson v Capital and Coast District Health Board [2015] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 199 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 27 Reference No. HRRT 028/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN ANGELA EMMA WATSON PLAINTIFF AND CAPITAL AND COAST DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr RK Musuku, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr AJ McKenzie for plaintiff Ms AC Whittaker for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 16 and 17 February 2015 DAT

  8. NZCASS Data tables 1 extent & nature [xlsx, 827 KB]

    ...Assault 512‡ 744 670 196‡ 302 278 5.5‡ 8.8 8.5 14.2‡ 21.7 20.5 Robbery 17^# 49 19# 16^# 44 18# 0.5^ 1.3 0.6 0.5^# 1.4 0.6# Threat – of force 401† 417 530 175‡ 225 264 4.9‡ 6.6 8.1 11.1† 12.2 16.2 Threat – to damage property 135 101 127 71 77 88 2.0† 2.2 2.7 3.7 3.0 3.9 Damage – personal property 67‡ 135 137 52‡ 97 91 1.4‡ 2.8 2.8 1.9‡ 3.9 4.2 Theft – personal property 68‡ 150 125 58‡ 110 97 1.6‡ 3.2 3.0 1.9‡ 4.4 3.8 Theft...

  9. Smitheram v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 24 [pdf, 483 KB]

    IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-101- 000048 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 24 BETWEEN VIVIENNE SMITHERAM AND BERNARD MCBRIDE Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND HANNA...

  10. De Malmanche & Ors as Trustees of the Lynette De Malmanche Trust v Auckland Council (successor to the Auckland City Council) [2010] NZWHT Auckland 38 [pdf, 392 KB]

    Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000088 [2010] NZWHT AUCKLAND 38 BETWEEN LYNETTE IDA DE MALMANCHE, MONICA CONSTANCE LENS and REDMOND TRUSTEES NO. 9 LIMITED as trustees of the LYNETTE DE MALMANCHE TRUST Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL successor to the AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND ROBERT CLARKE BICKERTON Second Respondent (Withdrawn) AND PETER LEONARD LOWE Third Respondent AND BRENT WILSON Fourth Respondent AND ANT