Search Results

1. Pue v Kīngi - Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Whenua Tōpu Trust (2015) 335 Aotea MB 1 (335 AOT 1) [pdf, 389 KB]

   335 Aotea MB 1 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20110010577 A20140007669 UNDER Sections 238, 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Whenua Tōpu Trust BETWEEN RATA PUE (DECEASED) Applicant AND MARIA KĪNGI, PAUL CARR, CYNTHIA KĪNGI BROWN, RON PUATA, RANGI TAPATU and TAMZYN PUE Respondents Hearing: 310 Aotea MB 191 dated 10

2. [2013] NZEmpC 71 Gilbert v Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd [pdf, 362 KB]

   DEREK WAYNE GILBERT V TRANSFIELD SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED NZEmpC CHCH [2013] NZEmpC 71 [29 April 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 71 CRC 46/10 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DEREK WAYNE GILBERT Plaintiff AND TRANSFIELD SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26-28 September 2011 and 1-3 February 2012 (Heard at Christchurch) Appearances:

3. [2015] NZEmpC 230 FIRST Union Inc v Jacks Hardware and Timber Ltd [pdf, 365 KB]

   FIRST UNION INC v JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED T/A MITRE 10 MEGA, DUNEDIN, AND MITRE 10, MOSGIEL NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 230 [17 December 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 230 EMPC 175/2015 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN FIRST UNION INC Plaintiff AND JACKS HARDWARE AND TIMBER LIMITED T/A MITRE 10 MEGA, DUNEDIN, AND MITRE 10, MOSGIEL Defendant

4. [2016] NZEnvC 051 Craddock Farms Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Court: Decision [2016] NZEnvC C->5\ ENV-2015-AKL- 000039 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under s120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN CRADDOCK FARMS LIMITED Appellant AND THE AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge C J Thompson Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Deputy Environment Commissioner D A Kernohan Hearing: at Auckland 26,27, 30 November, 1,3 December 2015 Site inspections 2 December 2015 Final submissions 9 February 201

5. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC evidence chief Nicole Bremner [pdf, 568 KB]

   ...Wharves. The Proposal may maintain accessibility in the short term provided Mr Shumane’s recommendations can be implemented, but doubt remains as to the longer term scenario. The Proposal was not anticipated to enhance accessibility. 101. The Proposal was considered to be contrary to Objective 13.3.3 - Roading and its Policies 1, 2 and 6. The Proposal would convey an access right for some private vehicles through an area identified for passenger transport priorities. I r...

6. National Standards Committee v Orlov [2013] NZLCDT 45 [pdf, 390 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZLCDT 45 LCDT 002/11 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE Applicant AND EVGENY ORLOV Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr W Chapman Mr J Clarke Mr S Maling Ms C Rowe HEARING at Auckland District Court DATE OF HEARING 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 September 2013

7. [2013] NZEmpC 234 Gazeley v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 320 KB]

   MARGOT ELIZABETH GAZELEY v OCEANIA GROUP (NZ) LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 234 [11 December 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 234 CRC 52/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to the determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MARGOT ELIZABETH GAZELEY Plaintiff AND OCEANIA GROUP (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 19-23, 26-29 August 2013 (Heard at Nelson) Appearances: Ms A Sh

8. [2015] NZEmpC 77 Adams t/a Untouchable hair & Skin v Brown [pdf, 281 KB]

   RICHARD & JENNIFER ADAMS trading as UNTOUCHABLE HAIR & SKIN v SHANNEN BROWN NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 77 [28 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 77 CRC 11/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RICHARD & JENNIFER ADAMS trading as UNTOUCHABLE HAIR & SKIN Plaintiff AND SHANNEN BROWN Defendant Hearing: 4, 5, 6, 17 March

9. Smith v Waitakere City Council [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...between the terms ‘water’ and ‘moisture’ and I conclude that the term ‘water penetration’ was intended to qualify both to the extent that claims under the Act may involve water penetration from above, or below a dwellinghouse. [101] To summarise the position then, it is sufficient to say that an adjudicator has jurisdiction to determine any claim made in relation to the cause or consequence of the penetration of a Claimant’s dwellinghouse by water. [102] In this...

10. BOAC v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 50-57 [pdf, 357 KB]

    Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2010-100-32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 and 41 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56 and 57 BETWEEN BOAC Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND HUGHES & TUKE CONSTRUCTION LTD Second Respondent AND DAVID CHARLES TUKE Third Respondent AND DAVID B MCGLASHAN Fourth Respondent AND RRL GROUP LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND BARRY RUSSELL BROWN (Undischarged Bankrupt) Si