Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 039 CEP Services Matauwhi Limited v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Court: Hearing: Last case event: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 039 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Topic 11 Biodiversity Appeal issues under Clause 14 of the Schedule 1 of the Act CEP SERVICES MATAUWHI LTD (ENV-2019-AKL-111) ROYAL FOREST AND BIRD PROTECTION SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED (ENV-2019-AKL-127) MANGAWHAIH

2. [2016] NZEnvC 248 Northcote Point Heritage Preservation Society Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   ...Landing Context Plan Southern Landing Mitigation Plan Rev A A A Dated 30.06.14 30.06.14 14.10.14 SkyPath conditions - November 2016 Team Leader, Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input, on (09) 301 0101. 87. The Team Leader Earthworks and Contaminated Land, Natural Resources and Specialist Input, shall be notified at least two (2) working days prior to the land disturbance activity on the subject site. . Advice Note: To comply wi...

3. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 178 KB]

   WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL CLAIM NO: TRI 2008-101-000045 BETWEEN ALISON MARGARET HEARN, MURRAY DEANS and HARTHAM TRUSTEES LIMITED as Trustees of the A HEARN FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND PARKLANE INVESTMENTS LIMITED First Respondent AND EMPA GROUP CONSULTANTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND RAJU MORAR, NEESHA MORAR and ISHWERAL MORAR as Trustees of the I & R MORAR FAMILY TRUST Fourth Respondent AND MARK ANDREW D

4. Territorial Authorities - EiC - M W Twose - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 893 KB]

   BI-098608-70-7-V4 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago. BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant AND CLUTHA DISTRICT COUNCIL, WAITAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL, QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL AND CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL Sect

5. LCRO 106/2018, 107/2018, 170/2018 and 181/2018 SY, [SAL] and DT v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (22 August 2019) [pdf, 462 KB]

   ...and final. 20 (b) Ms SY’S involvement was limited to providing the options and advice. (c) The Committee did not consider whether (I)’s legal fees were reasonably incurred. Mr DT’s submissions: As to the liability determination [101] Counsel for Mr DT attached very brief submissions to his application for review which in large measure merely expressed disagreement with the Committee’s liability determination. As to the compensation determination [102] Mr DT’s c...

6. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Netsafe Inc [2022] NZHRRT 15 (Removal of Certain Redactions After Appeal Period) [pdf, 511 KB]

   ...(Facebook) to seek removal of any posts specified in Mr Z’s complaint. This is relevant to the question of whether Netsafe took steps to resolve Mr Z’s complaint, including how perceived confidentiality obligations were managed when doing so. [101] There is no evidence that Netsafe contacted Facebook. Nor is there any evidence that Netsafe sought Mr Z’s consent to sharing any specific information with Facebook. Any such exchanges would have been recorded in the Zendesk system. T...

7. CVA Issues paper on implementation of the Victims Rights Act PDF [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   1 ` ABOUT THE AUTHOR ISSUES PAPER FOR THE CHIEF VICTIMS ADVISOR TO GOVERNMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 HOW THIS RESEARCH WAS UNDERTAKEN 4 Purpose 4 Terminology 4 Scope 4 Consultation undertaken with government agencies 6 Framework of this PAPER 9 BACKGROUND TO THE VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT 11 Victims of Offences Act (1987) 11 Referendum on the rights of victims and the victims rights bill (1999) 13

8. [2022] NZEnvC 162 Middle Hill Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   MIDDLE HILL LIMITED v AUCKLAND COUNCIL Decision [2022] NZEnvC 162 [26 August 2022] IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 162 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN MIDDLE HILL LIMITED ENV-2020-AKL-000048 Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Environment Commissioner RM Bartlett Enviro

9. [2023] NZEnvC 058 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   QTN PDP – TOPIC 18 UCESI v QLDC - DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 58 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED AND OTHERS (ENV-2018-CHC-56) (and all the appellants allocated to Topic 18) Appellants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court:

10. [2022] NZEmpC 77 Courage v Attorney-General [pdf, 422 KB]

    HOSEA COURAGE, DANIEL PILGRIM AND LEVI COURAGE v THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL SUED ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT, LABOUR INSPECTORATE [2022] NZEmpC 77 [10 May 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 77 EMPC 363/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 BETWEEN HOSEA COURAGE, DANIEL PILGRIM AND LEVI COURAGE Plainti