Search Results

1. Ward v Maccol Developments Ltd [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...recessed window installations. [100] The installation of the windows in the Owners’ dwelling has not been undertaken in accordance with any of the details specified in the Hardie Manual. CLAIM NO.00823 – WARD DETERMINATION.doc 27 [101] First, there are no head flashings which requirement is mandatory. Secondly, there are no jamb flashings which is the only means specified and detailed in the Hardie Manual of forming jambs for recessed window installations. Instead, narr...

2. Kelleway v Insar [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...Lack of sill and jamb flashings [99] An inquiry into this issue raises three distinct questions. [100] The first concerns whether the provision of sill and jamb flashings was a mandatory requirement under the Building Act 1991 in 1997. [101] Mr Maiden stated in his report dated 17 August 2000 that the lack of jamb and sill flashings to window and door openings is contrary to the building code. [102] Against that, Mr Alexander stated at paragraphs 35 & 36 of his bri...

3. Meulenbroek v Vision Antenna Systems Ltd [2014] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 226 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT [51] Reference No. HRRT 020/2013 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN MARK CHRISTOPHER MEULENBROEK PLAINTIFF AND VISION ANTENNA SYSTEMS LIMITED DEFENDANT AT INVERCARGILL BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Mr BK Neeson, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr RW Kee and Ms JV Emerson for plaintiff Ms RK Brazil and Ms H Young for defendant DATE OF HEARING:

4. [2017] NZEnvC 109 Norsho Bulc Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ( jBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: '1 t:;.~ IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC IOcr of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act NORSHO BULC LIMITED (ENV-2016-AKL-000168) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent BLACKBRIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED Section 274 party Environment Judge D Kirkpa

5. MLC 2018 August National Panui [pdf, 276 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in AUGUST | HERE-TURI-KÖKÄ 2018: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz AUGUST | HERE-TURI-KÖKÄ 2018 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For

6. MLC 2018 August National Panui [pdf, 268 KB]

   Contents: Applications for hearing in AUGUST | HERE-TURI-KÖKÄ 2018: ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz AUGUST | HERE-TURI-KÖKÄ 2018 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confi rmed at the time of this publication are listed. For

7. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Evidence - Ben Farrell [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   BI-309448-3-478-V2 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV-2016-CHC-47 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 120 Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BLUESKIN ENERGY LIMITED Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF BEN FARRELL ____________________________________________________________ GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN LAWYERS DUNEDIN Solicitor on record: B Irving

8. [2024] NZEnvC 176 Waimarino Queenstown Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 942 KB]

   ...conceptually, from the issue of whether the receiving environment (beyond the subject site) to be considered under s 104(1)(a), can include the future environment. The previous decisions of this Court do not decide or even comment on that issue. [101] As reiterated in a number of High Court decisions,25 the oft cited paragraph [84] from Hawthorn, which was addressing the future state of the environment (where effects have to be accounted for and not discounted) should not be applie...

9. [2023] NZEnvC 226 Scaife v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   SCAIFE v QLDC – TOPIC 38 – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 226 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN M SCAIFE (ENV-2021-CHC-022) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Commissioner J T Baines Hearing: at Queenstown

10. LCRO 14/2023 BW and Company A Limited v PK and OJ (31 August 2023) [pdf, 430 KB]

    ...agreement that he could act as given in a teleconference on 9 July 2021” and that Mr BW “… cannot rely on Mr OJ who did not have full knowledge of the raids, the nature of the information being sought by the Agency, or the underlying issues”. [101] This is implicitly a conclusion that Mr OJ’s consent as director to Mr BW acting for Company B could not have been “informed” for the purposes of that rule. [102] Next, the Committee addressed the issue of the complainants...