Search Results

1. NZCVS Cycle 1 (2018) data tables [xlsx, 369 KB]

   ...(personal) 83 25.88 # 65 24.26 # 1.66 0.40 ⱡ 2.10 25.88 # Robbery and assault (except sexual assault) 233 25.29 # 111 15.61 2.82 0.44 5.92 25.29 # Fraud and deception 
 273 14.66 207 12.44 5.24 0.65 6.92 14.66 Cybercrime
 119 20.33 # 101 19.67 2.57 0.50 3.01 20.33 # Sexual assault 193 25.98 # 87 22.62 # 2.22 0.50 ⱡ 4.88 25.98 # Harassment and threatening behaviour 
 300 30.29 # 118 18.48 2.98 0.55 7.62 30.29 # All personal offences 1200 13.30 575 7...

2. Name suppression December 2023 [xlsx, 135 KB]

   ...only Total 4,267 4,378 4,309 4,712 4,615 4,240 4,531 4,635 5,857 6,998 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Final only 01: Homicide and related offences 2 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 <1% 1% <1% <1% 0% <1% 0% 0% <1% <1% Final only 02: Acts intended to cause injury 70 101 137 133 65 57 85 97 104 56 17% 25% 27% 22% 22% 19% 14% 21% 25% 24% Final only 03: Sexual assault and related offences 91 152 206 190 50 136 280 168 98 35 22% 37% 40% 32% 17% 46% 46% 37% 24% 15% Final onl...

3. Beattie v Official Assignee [2021] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...of practice issued under section 46 or section 63, conduct is excepted from conduct that is an interference with the privacy of an individual, the onus of proving the exception in any proceedings under this Part lies upon the defendant. Section 101 of the 2020 Act is to the same effect. [76] As held in Geary v Accident Compensation Corporation [2013] NZHRRT 34 at [74] and [75], the relevant date on which the agency must have good reason for refusing access to personal information is th...

4. People charged and convicted of driving under the influence offences June 2019 [xlsx, 867 KB]

   ...Waikato Te Awamutu Convicted 162 148 136 93 97 58 62 86 91 105 Waikato Te Awamutu Other proved 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Waikato Te Awamutu Not proved 11 14 4 3 4 1 6 2 4 8 Waikato Te Awamutu Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Awamutu Total 174 164 141 97 101 59 68 89 95 114 Waikato Te Kuiti Convicted 122 112 112 87 78 95 55 68 63 49 Waikato Te Kuiti Other proved 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Kuiti Not proved 8 5 6 3 1 2 4 3 2 2 Waikato Te Kuiti Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Waikato Te Kuiti...

5. People charged and convicted of drug offences June 2020 [xlsx, 280 KB]

   ...proved 19 20 23 23 7 8 10 2 4 3 37% 33% 53% 55% 25% 25% 33% 22% 25% 33% Other opiates Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Other opiates Total 51 60 43 42 28 32 30 9 16 9 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Stimulants and depressants Convicted 122 136 120 93 93 101 95 106 49 39 61% 68% 43% 52% 48% 65% 68% 71% 56% 64% Stimulants and depressants Other proved 12 7 9 7 9 10 1 6 5 5 6% 4% 3% 4% 5% 6% 1% 4% 6% 8% Stimulants and depressants Not proved 65 57 149 79...

6. BORA Regulatory Systems (Workforce) Amendment Bill (No 2) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...does not comply with the requirements under s 229. 1 See, for example, Slaight Communications v Davidson 59 DLR (4th) 416; Wooley v Maynard 430 US 705 (1977). 2 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 16. We consider the extension of the powers under s 229 to a wider set of circumstances constitutes a search for the purposes of s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. Ordinarily, a provision foun...

7. BORA Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Bill [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...effectiveness of fluoride for reducing dental decay, the number of people who will be 2 New Health New Zealand Inc v South Taranaki District Council [2014] NZHC 395 at [118]. 3 Ibid. 4 Ibid at [101] – [111]. affected by the decision to fluoridate or not fluoridate the drinking water, and whether the benefits of adding fluoride to the drinking water outweigh the financial costs. 13. For these reasons, we conclude that any li...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 29 Maharaja India Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...Assignee has confirmed that he has not provided such a consent and does not intend to do so. 1 A Labour Inspector v Maharaja India Ltd [2019] NZERA 465 (Member Crichton). 2 Insolvency Act 2006, s 101. 3 Insolvency Act 2006, ss 3 and 117(4)(a)(iii). [7] Turning to the position of MIL, at the date of adjudication Mr Raizada was the sole director and shareholder of that company. A person who is an undischarged bankrupt is...

9. Retail Payment System Amendment Bill [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...as including the right not to be compelled to say certain things or provide certain information.4 1 Pursuant to s 39(p) of the Bill. 2 New Zealand Stock Exchange v Comissioner of Inland Revenue [1992] 3 NZLR 1 (PCP). 3 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [172] per Blanchard J. 4 See, for example, Slaight Communications v Davidson 59 DLR (4th) 416; Wooley v Maynard 430 US 705 (1977). 18. We consider that the powers contained in ss 38(c)-(e) of the Bill limit the...

10. Protection-order-applications-jun2022-v1.0.xlsx [xlsx, 299 KB]

    ...include children 84 98 72 38 53 55 82 82 87 73 20% 26% 35% 23% 33% 31% 48% 44% 37% 40% Total 425 380 206 162 161 176 171 187 238 184 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Without notice Includes children 2,309 2,803 3,035 3,127 3,108 3,178 3,101 3,613 3,289 2,825 73% 75% 77% 75% 74% 73% 72% 72% 69% 69% Doesn't include children 837 923 932 1,041 1,066 1,173 1,186 1,410 1,456 1,269 27% 25% 23% 25% 26% 27% 28% 28% 31% 31% Total 3,146 3,726 3,967 4,168 4,174 4,351 4,287 5,02...