Search Results

1. People charged and convicted of violent offences December 2020 [xlsx, 202 KB]

   ...Taitokerau Dargaville Convicted 69 46 53 35 36 29 31 24 28 19 Taitokerau Dargaville Other proved 15 12 14 4 10 2 3 2 2 3 Taitokerau Dargaville Not proved 17 8 18 7 6 6 2 6 7 3 Taitokerau Dargaville Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Taitokerau Dargaville Total 101 66 85 46 52 37 37 32 37 25 Taitokerau Kaikohe Convicted 219 195 242 194 167 190 185 161 151 157 Taitokerau Kaikohe Other proved 28 21 43 31 11 30 31 24 18 12 Taitokerau Kaikohe Not proved 51 46 47 52 38 40 45 44 32 42 Taitokerau Kaiko...

2. People charged and convicted of serious offence December 2021 [xlsx, 190 KB]

   ...Plenty Justice service area total Total 1,177 1,085 992 827 974 968 961 865 943 886 Waiariki Rotorua Convicted 458 427 374 336 450 481 409 413 429 404 Waiariki Rotorua Other proved 74 36 57 52 57 62 57 44 44 62 Waiariki Rotorua Not proved 174 120 101 93 107 107 145 134 126 140 Waiariki Rotorua Other 2 2 1 5 2 4 9 4 11 7 Waiariki Rotorua Total 708 585 533 486 616 654 620 595 610 613 Waiariki Taumarunui Convicted 47 26 29 36 30 28 24 22 21 22 Waiariki Taumarunui Other proved 15 8 9 6 9 3 5...

3. Family Court applications December 2023 [xlsx, 186 KB]

   Contents Family Court applications Family Court application data is extracted from a live dataset that is used for operational purposes, meaning the data will be updated with late data entry and active applications progressing through the court process. Therefore, this data may differ to data reported elsewhere with a different extraction date. These tables were extracted on 28 February 2024. Contents: Table 1a: Number and percentage of substantive Family Court applications filed, b

4. Family Court applications June 2023 [xlsx, 186 KB]

   ...violence 7,768 7,670 7,889 8,025 8,232 8,056 8,971 8,769 7,514 8,451 11% 13% 13% 13% 14% 13% 15% 14% 14% 14% Guardianship 22,482 18,555 19,052 18,919 18,647 17,977 17,751 17,373 14,997 16,562 33% 31% 32% 31% 31% 30% 30% 28% 27% 28% Hague 73 99 95 112 100 117 91 56 101 90 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% Mental health 6,559 6,445 7,070 7,108 7,075 7,130 7,366 7,546 7,829 8,191 10% 11% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 14% 14% Oranga Tamariki 11,067 10,557 10,478 10...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 210 Robinson v Pacific Seals Ltd oral judgement [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...against the plaintiff. The sum sought by way of security is $5,000. 1 Robinson v Pacific Seals (NZ) Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 99. 2 Robinson v Pacific Seals (NZ) Ltd [2013] NZERA Wellington 101. Security for costs [2] There is no express provision in the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act), to order security for costs. However, it has been accepted in numerous cases that the Court has the power to make such order...

6. BORA Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Amendment Bill [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. Jeff Orr Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel 3 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [162].

7. [2019] NZEmpC 89 Martinsen v Target International (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...referred to in the pleadings. 6 Lyttelton Port Co Ltd v Pender [2019] NZEmpC 86 at [49]-[53]. 7 Morgan v Whanganui College Board of Trustees, above n 2, at [11]. 8 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 101(ab), 143(b). 9 Morgan v Whanganui College Board of Trustees, above n 2, at [27]. [18] Accordingly, paragraph 32 of the statement of claim is struck out. An amended statement of claim omitting that paragraph is to be filed an...

8. Oranga Tamariki Amendment Bill [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...the search power in cl 12 is reasonable, we have considered the importance of the objective sought to be achieved and whether the provisions are rationally connected and proportionate to that objective. 1 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 2 Hamed v R, above n 1, at [162] per Blanchard J 3 Hamed v R, above n 1, at [172]. 14. On balance, we consider that the search power in new s 104(3)(c) is reasonable for the purposes o...

9. 4 July 2022 Remediation (NZ) Limited v Taranaki Regional Council [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...operation of Remediation (NZ) Limited's waste management facility Lodgement: ENV-2021-AKL-000059 Remediation (NZ) Limited v Taranaki Regional Council Initiator Remediation (NZ) Limited DeAnne Brabant, Brabant Law, Legal House, Level 7, 101 Lambton Quay, Wellington 6011 Initiator Remediation (NZ) Limited John Maassen, PO Box 5577, Wellington 6145 Initiator Remediation (NZ) Limited Rochelle Stevens, NO COUNSEL FIRM ADDRESS AVAILABLE FOR Nicholsons Respondent Taranaki Region...

10. NZBORA Advice Fuel Industry Amendment Bill [pdf, 248 KB]

    ...Bill’s objective. 1 The Supreme Court has held that an unreasonable search logically cannot be demonstrably justified under section 5 of the Bill of Rights Act and therefore the inquiry does not need to be undertaken (see Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [162] per Blanchard J). Rather, s 21 is self-limiting in that the assessment to be undertaken is whether the search power is reasonable. 2 Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7, [2007] 3 NZLR 1. 14. The strict liability offe...