Search Results

Search results for 101.

3501 items matching your search terms

  1. Forests (Regulation of Log Traders and Forestry Advisers) Amendment Bill [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...context. 17. On this basis, we regard searches under the Bill as being reasonable, and thus not in conflict with s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. Section 25(c) - Right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty 2 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 3 Above n1 at [162]. 4 At [172]. LEGAL ADVICE LPA 01 01 24 18. Section 25(c) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone who is charged with an offence has, in relation to the determi...

  2. [2022] NZEmpC 72 Lawton v Steel Pencil Holdings Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

    ...Regulations 2000. While the financial component was the 4 Morgan v Whanganui College Board of Trustees [2014] NZCA 340, [2014] 3 NZLR 713, [2014] ERNZ 80 at [11]. 5 Moore v McNabb (2005) 18 PRNZ 127 at [56]. 6 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 101(ab), 143(b). 7 Martinsen, above n 3, at [16]. same, a Calderbank offer can be (and often is) made with a financial component that is identical to a previous without prejudice offer.8 [16] The new elements mean the o...

  3. [2023] NZEmpC 70 Pietras v Vegar [pdf, 200 KB]

    ...what further steps they wish to take, including by way of challenge 10 At [23]. 11 Fletcher v Sharp Tudhope Lawyers [2014] NZEmpC 182 at [18]. 12 Subject to Employment Relations Act 2000, s 157. 13 UXK v Talent Propellor Ltd [2022] NZEmpC 101, [2022] 1 ERNZ 396. to the Court, which can be on a de novo basis. If the Authority finds the present defendant was not the person who had employed Mr Pietras, and Mr Pietras considers that to be incorrect, he may challenge th...

  4. OIA-98433.pdf [pdf, 933 KB]

    ...0 72 304 0 68 293 59 234 53 273 0 45-49 77 362 0 69 335 0 84 376 0 77 372 0 89 347 70 279 63 320 0 50-54 58 296 0 58 290 0 42 311 1 58 316 0 57 304 67 258 62 277 0 55-59 32 206 1 31 198 0 40 182 0 34 235 0 37 269 27 185 42 228 0 60-64 16 94 2 12 101 1 13 116 0 13 122 0 20 159 15 128 22 122 0 65-69 2 48 0 4 61 0 3 64 0 6 83 2 4 67 4 61 10 70 1 70-74 0 10 0 3 22 0 2 14 0 2 23 1 2 27 3 27 2 23 1 75-79 0 3 0 0 4 0 1 7 0 0 5 0 0 6 1 2 0 6 0 80-84 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Grand...

  5. OIA-121103.pdf [pdf, 815 KB]

    ...0921: Counterfeiting of currency 1 <1% 0922: Forgery of documents 15 <1% 0923: Possess equipment to make false/illegal instrument 4 <1% 099: Other fraud and deception offences 0991: Dishonest conversion 7 <1% 10: Illicit drug offences 101: Import or export illicit drugs 1010: Import or export illicit drugs not further defined 52 1% 102: Deal or traffic in illicit drugs 1020: Deal or traffic in illicit drugs not further defined 262 4% 103: Manufacture or cultivate illicit...

  6. Glossary-of-firearm-terms-for-the-Arms-Act-public-consultation.pdf [pdf, 333 KB]

    ...semi-automatic pistol The Act defines this as a semi-automatic pistol that: • has an overall length of 400 millimetres or less, excluding any silencer, pistol carbine conversion kit, or other muzzle-fitting attachment • has a barrel length of 101 millimetres or more • is capable of firing specified ammunition only at a muzzle velocity of 1,600 feet per second or less • is suitable for shooting on a certified pistol range. The definition of a prohibited magazine in the Act...

  7. Timeframes

    ...advise the defendant and the court of the expected date of full disclosure. Pre-trial applications (jury trial) Pre-trial applications, for example, applications for oral evidence orders under section 90 of the Act, admissibility of evidence under section 101, and Judge-alone trials under sections 102 and 103 must be made not later than at the trial callover. Responding to an application A party responds to an application in writing under rule 2.12 by filing and serving a notice of respons...

  8. WHT Annual Report 2024 [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...need to be made available, to support the evidence given by them to the Tribunal. JURISDICTION AND GENERAL INFORMATION Establishment and Function of the Tribunal The Tribunal is based in Auckland. It was established in 2007 by section 101 of the Act. It was part of Government’s response to the ‘leaky homes crisis’ enabling claims by the owners of dwellinghouses (stand-alone homes, townhouses and apartments) to be heard faster and more economically than in the gene...

  9. [2025] NZSSAA 17 (29 May 2025) [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...elevating XXXX’s circumstances to 2 Established pursuant to s 124(1)(d) of the Social Security Act, 18 December 1998. The Programme is saved by sch 1 cl 21 of the Social Security Act 2018 as if it were a special assistance programme established under s 101 of that Act, P a g e | 5 meet the exceptional circumstances test. Many people cannot drive, due to health circumstances, affordability and other situations. Regardless, we consider that: [22.1] A recoverable grant would make X...

  10. Waitangi Tribunal - The Volcanic Plateau [pdf, 3.8 MB]

    RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 7 THE VOLCANIC PLATEAU BRIAN J BARGH NOVEMBER 1995 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES WAITANGI TRIBUNAL DIVISION Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District l3: The Northern South Island, Dr G A Phillipson FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui programme. In its present f