Search Results

1. [2023] NZIACDT 1 - NI v Chak (5 January 2023) [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...could not give the name of the assigned officer, the 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 operators spoken to were unable to assist. He could not send an email enquiry for the same reason. ASSESSMENT [59] The Tribunal will consider the heads of complaint separately. Dishonest or misleading...

2. People charged and convicted of family violence offences June 2019 [xlsx, 760 KB]

   ...Nelson/Marlborough/West Coast Justice service area total Not proved 14 14 16 21 10 19 19 22 13 12 Nelson/Marlborough/West Coast Justice service area total Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Nelson/Marlborough/West Coast Justice service area total Total 64 93 89 96 97 101 117 139 103 107 Canterbury Ashburton Convicted 6 8 9 5 9 5 8 7 8 11 Canterbury Ashburton Other proved 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Canterbury Ashburton Not proved 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 Canterbury Ashburton Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Canterb...

3. NZCVS Cycle 1 (2018) data tables [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...RSE level 000s RSE (%) RSE level Theft and property damage (personal) 83 25.88 # 65 24.26 # Robbery and assault (except sexual assault) 233 25.29 # 111 15.61 Fraud and deception 
 273 14.66 207 12.44 Cybercrime
 119 20.33 # 101 19.67 Sexual assault 193 25.98 # 87 22.62 # Harassment and threatening behaviour 
 300 30.29 # 118 18.48 All personal offences 1200 13.30 575 7.93 All offences - offence level (a) 1,777 9.36 - - All...

4. [2009] NZEmpC AC 47/09 Hyro Services Pty Ltd v Speed [pdf, 30 KB]

   ...The plaintiff sought to distinguish this case from those in which the challenger’s behaviour amounted to intentional obstruction or other destructive/inappropriate behaviour. The plaintiff relied on Taylor v Von Tunzelman [2008] ERNZ 101 for the proposition that for the Court to limit the nature and extent of the hearing of a challenge following a good faith report, the failures must have been deliberate in the sense of being more than the consequence of simple inadverten...

5. Morehu v Committee of Management of the Opawa Rangitoto 2C Incorporation – Opawa Rangitoto 2C Incorporation (2013) 74 Waiariki MB 97 (74 WAR 97) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...Committee also notes that the administrators of the estate are Rocky Cuthbert and Terence Cuthbert neither of whom signed the requisition. It is submitted these shares of 1,343 should not be counted as supporting the requisition. 74 Waiariki MB 101 [15] Further, the shares of Pauni Turetahi, it is submitted should not be counted as supporting the requisition as those shares are legally owned by his deceased mother in accordance with a life interest. [16] There was also unc...

6. Annual provisional suicide figures for 2013/14 [pdf, 504 KB]

   ...Mäori Pacific Other Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate 2007/2008 21 5.93 87 15.39 24 9.05 408 13.26 2008/2009 10 2.82 95 16.81 26 9.81 400 13.00 2009/2010 22 6.21 105 18.58 31 11.69 383 12.45 2010/2011 19 5.36 101 17.87 22 8.30 416 13.52 2011/2012 19 5.36 132 23.34 31 11.69 365 11.24 2012/2013 28 7.90 105 18.58 24 9.05 384 12.48 2013/2014 22 4.67 108 18.06 26 8.81 373 12.96 Note: The per 100,000 population rate shown has been c...

7. Media release and annual provisional suicide figures for 2011/12 [pdf, 536 KB]

   ...Mäori Pacific Other Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate 2007/2008 21 5.93 87 15.39 24 9.05 408 13.26 2008/2009 10 2.82 95 16.81 26 9.81 400 13.00 2009/2010 22 6.21 105 18.58 31 11.69 383 12.45 2010/2011 19 5.36 101 17.87 22 8.30 416 13.52 2011/2012 19 5.36 132 23.34 31 11.69 365 11.24 Note: The per 100,000 population rate shown has been calculated following Statistics New Zealand annual population for the 2006 census year. Table 4 shows pr...

8. BORA Video Camera Surveillance (Temporary Measures) Bill [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...the Bill of Rights Act. This advice has been prepared by the Public Law Group and the Office of Legal Counsel, in consultation with the Crown Law Office. Jeff Orr Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel Footnotes: 1. [2011] NZSC 101 2. Under cl 4 of the Bill ‘specified person’ means any person charged with offences against the Crimes Act 1961 or the Arms Act 1983 following a police investigation into events in the Urewera ranges in 2006 and 2007 that is known as...

9. OT v PI LCRO 101 / 2011 (20 August 2012) [pdf, 67 KB]

   LCRO 101/2011 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Auckland Standards Committee 4 BETWEEN MR OT Applicant AND MR PI Respondent The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr OT complained to the New Zealand Law Society in April 2009 about an opinion provided by Mr PI to an E...

10. Financial Sector (Climate-related Disclosures and other matters) Amendment Bill [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...Searches must be carried out at reasonable times. Information gathered as part of searches under the Public Audit Act has explicit protections against self-incrimination, provided for in s 31 of the Act. 3 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 4 Above, n1 at [162]. 5 At [172]. 20. On this basis we consider that any searches authorised by the Bill are reasonable for the purposes of s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. Section 25(c)...