Search Results

1. [2024] NZIACDT 07 – MM v Ma (30 January 2024) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 7 At [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 8 From the Registrar [29] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (25 August 2023), with a file of supporting documents. From the complainant [30] There are no submissions fro...

2. OIA-106152.pdf [pdf, 310 KB]

   ...2019 2020 2021 2022 19 years and under 27 25 34 21 21 33 44 55 50 45 54 47 28 40 30 32 26 29 25 19 10 20-24 66 60 56 47 50 50 81 89 110 95 90 89 77 75 110 92 71 70 64 66 47 25-29 86 63 75 73 73 96 79 111 106 109 124 106 111 126 127 169 123 124 111 86 101 30-34 80 108 85 107 91 109 121 146 143 157 148 126 126 122 160 170 132 120 109 91 121 35-39 89 78 104 85 92 94 162 147 174 145 161 119 124 111 118 121 124 90 106 96 102 40-44 50 48 52 72 69 78 105 122 113 113 127 124 111 92 101 109 71 75 49 55...

3. Chalecki v Accident Compensation Corporation (Entitlement to Vocational Rehabilitation Costs, Decision Capable of Review) [2023] NZACC 88 [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...decision is plainly wrong. (90) Having considered this matter, I am unable to find ACC wrongly exercised its discretion. [36] In the review decision of 4 May 2002, the reviewer, Lisa Ormandy reached the following conclusion. [106] At paragraph 101, in relation to Mr Chalecki’s claim for reimbursement of vocational rehabilitation costs, I am satisfied that there is no evidence that ACC acted on an error of law or principle, failed to take account of any relevant matter, took into...

4. ZH v Ma [2025] NZIACDT 30 (6 June 2025) [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 8 Z, at [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 8 e. obtain and carry out the informed lawful instructions of the client, and … Conflicts of interest 5. Where a licensed immigration adviser is aware that there is a potential or actual conflict of int...

5. Mauve v Oranga Tamariki [2024] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...Ground relied on under Privacy Act 1993 Tribunal Decision Tabs 1 & 2 1- 71 Duplicate of parts of Tabs 6 & 7 s 29(1)(a) Refer discussion in relation to Tabs 6 and 7 below Tab 3 72-73 Duplicate of part of Tab 6 (pages 101 and 102) s 29(1)(a) Refusal justified - Unwarranted disclosure of affairs of another Tab 4 74-78 Redacted sections Psychologist’s report s 29(1)(a) To be released to Ms Mauve (refer para [21]], n 7)28 Tab 5...

6. [2023] NZIACDT 1 - NI v Chak (5 January 2023) [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...could not give the name of the assigned officer, the 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 operators spoken to were unable to assist. He could not send an email enquiry for the same reason. ASSESSMENT [59] The Tribunal will consider the heads of complaint separately. Dishonest or misleading...

7. People charged and convicted of family violence offences June 2019 [xlsx, 760 KB]

   ...Nelson/Marlborough/West Coast Justice service area total Not proved 14 14 16 21 10 19 19 22 13 12 Nelson/Marlborough/West Coast Justice service area total Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Nelson/Marlborough/West Coast Justice service area total Total 64 93 89 96 97 101 117 139 103 107 Canterbury Ashburton Convicted 6 8 9 5 9 5 8 7 8 11 Canterbury Ashburton Other proved 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Canterbury Ashburton Not proved 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 Canterbury Ashburton Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Canterb...

8. NZCVS Cycle 1 (2018) data tables [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...RSE level 000s RSE (%) RSE level Theft and property damage (personal) 83 25.88 # 65 24.26 # Robbery and assault (except sexual assault) 233 25.29 # 111 15.61 Fraud and deception 
 273 14.66 207 12.44 Cybercrime
 119 20.33 # 101 19.67 Sexual assault 193 25.98 # 87 22.62 # Harassment and threatening behaviour 
 300 30.29 # 118 18.48 All personal offences 1200 13.30 575 7.93 All offences - offence level (a) 1,777 9.36 - - All...

9. [2009] NZEmpC AC 47/09 Hyro Services Pty Ltd v Speed [pdf, 30 KB]

   ...The plaintiff sought to distinguish this case from those in which the challenger’s behaviour amounted to intentional obstruction or other destructive/inappropriate behaviour. The plaintiff relied on Taylor v Von Tunzelman [2008] ERNZ 101 for the proposition that for the Court to limit the nature and extent of the hearing of a challenge following a good faith report, the failures must have been deliberate in the sense of being more than the consequence of simple inadverten...

10. Morehu v Committee of Management of the Opawa Rangitoto 2C Incorporation – Opawa Rangitoto 2C Incorporation (2013) 74 Waiariki MB 97 (74 WAR 97) [pdf, 137 KB]

    ...Committee also notes that the administrators of the estate are Rocky Cuthbert and Terence Cuthbert neither of whom signed the requisition. It is submitted these shares of 1,343 should not be counted as supporting the requisition. 74 Waiariki MB 101 [15] Further, the shares of Pauni Turetahi, it is submitted should not be counted as supporting the requisition as those shares are legally owned by his deceased mother in accordance with a life interest. [16] There was also unc...