Search Results

Search results for 101.

3434 items matching your search terms

  1. Application for Criminal Legal Aid form [pdf, 358 KB]

    ...you have any questions call 0800 2 LEGAL AID (253 425) or go to: www.justice.govt.nz/legal-aid You can email the completed form to: » wgncriminallegalaid@justice.govt.nz » aklcriminallegalaid@justice.govt.nz Or post it to: » Legal Aid Services SX10146, Wellington » Legal Aid Services BX10660, Auckland Applicant confirmation By signing this application form, you agree and acknowledge that: » personal information about you will be collected and/or disclosed to meet responsibilities un...

  2. Hunia v Skerrett-White - Kawerau A8 D Block [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 50 (2017 APPEAL 50) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...this test was applied in Shaw – Tauwhare Te Ngare (although not for the purpose of appeal). 10 6 Hau v Foy & Ors – Te Kaha 20B (1998) 1 Waiariki Appellate Court MB 94 (1 AP 94). 7 At 101. 8 Bozson v Altrincham Urban District Council [1903] 1 KB 547. 9 In Re Marangairoa A29 and Marangairoa A31 Inc (1962) 28 Gisborne ACMB 155 (28 APGS 155); Williams v Williams – Matauri 2F2B (1991) 3 Taitokerau Appellate MB 20 (3 A...

  3. Urban Development Bill Advice [pdf, 131 KB]

    ...power to enter land and buildings and carry out the search functions detailed in cl 269(2) are rationally connected to to achieving its purpose to select, assess 1 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 2 Hamed v R, above n 1, at [162]. and implement SDPs. We understand the objectives of enabling Kāinga Ora to have accurate and reliable information to exercise its functions to be suff...

  4. [2022] NZIACDT 11 - BU v McCarthy (18 May 2022) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 6 ASSESSMENT [27] The Registrar relies on cl 1 of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a...

  5. Forests (Legal Harvest Assurance) Amendment Bill [pdf, 149 KB]

    ...seizure is reasonable. In assessing whether this search power is reasonable, we have considered the place of the search, the degree of intrusiveness into privacy, and the reasons why it is necessary.7 4 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 5 Defined in s 2 of the principal Act as the Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries. 6 Above n1 at [162]. 7 At [172]. 19. Requiring a person to provide information serves th...

  6. [2022] NZEmpC 178 UXK v Talent Propeller Ltd [pdf, 228 KB]

    ...made by the Employment Relations Authority that certain witness summonses should be issued.2 My judgment also dealt with an application for non-publication of UXK’s name and identifying details. 1 UXK v Talent Propeller Ltd [2022] NZEmpC 101. 2 The determination was in the form of two documents described as “Minutes”. [2] I reserved costs. I recorded the Court had been told UXK was legally aided for the purposes of the challenge. The parties were invited to d...

  7. [2022] NZIACDT 3 - IL v Khetarpal (10 February 2022) [pdf, 140 KB]

    ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 6 Client Care 2. A licensed immigration adviser must: … e. obtain and carry out the informed lawful instructions of the client, and … Legislative requirements 3. A licensed immigration adviser...

  8. [2024] NZEnvC 074 GI Finlay Trustees Ltd v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...have now come to be applied not just in determining whether higher than normal costs should be awarded but in determining whether costs should be awarded at all and, if so, at what level.2 1 Goodwin v Wellington City Council [2021] NZEnvC 101 at [41]. 2 Development Finance Corporation of New Zealand Ltd v Bielby [1991] 1 NZLR 587 (HC). 5 [12] These factors now overlap with paragraph 10.7(j) of the Environment Court Practice Note which provides as follows: In considerin...

  9. Martin v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 67 [pdf, 211 KB]

    ...applicable to the former. If that were not the case, the appellant’s Australian employer would be an “employer” for the purposes of the ARCI Act. That would then lead to the Australian employer being liable to pay employee premiums under s 101 of the Act. That such is plainly not the case, nor intended to be, reinforces the view that it is only income or earnings which are subject to New Zealand income tax law which can be considered as determining entitlement to weekly compe...

  10. LCRO Annual report 2023-2024 [pdf, 351 KB]

    ...made to refund fees totalling $1,517.30. Applications for review to be completed As at 30 June 2024, 183 applications for review were active, compared to 221 at the end of the previous reporting period. Of the reviews pending: • 101 were lodged in the last 12 months • 82 were lodged prior to July 2023. NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY The LCRO primarily interfaces with the NZLS in two ways. One way arises by virtue of ss 124(g) and 125(g) of the Act, which require t...