Search Results

1. Plant Variety Rights [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...Act. 13 Cabinet Manual 2017, p. 2. 14 See R v Williams [2007] NZCA 52 at [48]; Andrew Butler and Petra Butler The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary (2nd ed, LexisNexis, Wellington, 2015) [18.7.1]. 15 Plant Variety Rights Bill, cl 101(4). 16 Clause 19. Conclusion 37. We have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. Edrick Child Deputy Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 108 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...an email chain between an officer of the Union and Mr Oldfield for which legal professional privilege is claimed, but will be disclosed to the plaintiff on the same basis of partial waiver of privilege as set out in [36]. [25] Document 101 consists of communications dated 14 December 2010 between Mr Oldfield and union officers. Legal professional privilege is claimed in respect of these communications and is upheld. This document does not need to be disclosed. [26] Documen...

3. Application for Criminal Legal Aid form [pdf, 358 KB]

   ...you have any questions call 0800 2 LEGAL AID (253 425) or go to: www.justice.govt.nz/legal-aid You can email the completed form to: » wgncriminallegalaid@justice.govt.nz » aklcriminallegalaid@justice.govt.nz Or post it to: » Legal Aid Services SX10146, Wellington » Legal Aid Services BX10660, Auckland Applicant confirmation By signing this application form, you agree and acknowledge that: » personal information about you will be collected and/or disclosed to meet responsibilities un...

4. Hunia v Skerrett-White - Kawerau A8 D Block [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 50 (2017 APPEAL 50) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...this test was applied in Shaw – Tauwhare Te Ngare (although not for the purpose of appeal). 10 6 Hau v Foy & Ors – Te Kaha 20B (1998) 1 Waiariki Appellate Court MB 94 (1 AP 94). 7 At 101. 8 Bozson v Altrincham Urban District Council [1903] 1 KB 547. 9 In Re Marangairoa A29 and Marangairoa A31 Inc (1962) 28 Gisborne ACMB 155 (28 APGS 155); Williams v Williams – Matauri 2F2B (1991) 3 Taitokerau Appellate MB 20 (3 A...

5. Urban Development Bill Advice [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...power to enter land and buildings and carry out the search functions detailed in cl 269(2) are rationally connected to to achieving its purpose to select, assess 1 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 2 Hamed v R, above n 1, at [162]. and implement SDPs. We understand the objectives of enabling Kāinga Ora to have accurate and reliable information to exercise its functions to be suff...

6. [2022] NZIACDT 11 - BU v McCarthy (18 May 2022) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 6 ASSESSMENT [27] The Registrar relies on cl 1 of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a...

7. Forests (Legal Harvest Assurance) Amendment Bill [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...seizure is reasonable. In assessing whether this search power is reasonable, we have considered the place of the search, the degree of intrusiveness into privacy, and the reasons why it is necessary.7 4 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 5 Defined in s 2 of the principal Act as the Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries. 6 Above n1 at [162]. 7 At [172]. 19. Requiring a person to provide information serves th...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 178 UXK v Talent Propeller Ltd [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...made by the Employment Relations Authority that certain witness summonses should be issued.2 My judgment also dealt with an application for non-publication of UXK’s name and identifying details. 1 UXK v Talent Propeller Ltd [2022] NZEmpC 101. 2 The determination was in the form of two documents described as “Minutes”. [2] I reserved costs. I recorded the Court had been told UXK was legally aided for the purposes of the challenge. The parties were invited to d...

9. [2022] NZIACDT 3 - IL v Khetarpal (10 February 2022) [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 6 Client Care 2. A licensed immigration adviser must: … e. obtain and carry out the informed lawful instructions of the client, and … Legislative requirements 3. A licensed immigration adviser...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 074 GI Finlay Trustees Ltd v Western Bay of Plenty District Council [pdf, 175 KB]

    ...have now come to be applied not just in determining whether higher than normal costs should be awarded but in determining whether costs should be awarded at all and, if so, at what level.2 1 Goodwin v Wellington City Council [2021] NZEnvC 101 at [41]. 2 Development Finance Corporation of New Zealand Ltd v Bielby [1991] 1 NZLR 587 (HC). 5 [12] These factors now overlap with paragraph 10.7(j) of the Environment Court Practice Note which provides as follows: In considerin...