Search Results

1. Williams v Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc - Pukahukiwi Kaokaoroa 2 Inc (2023) 295 Waiariki MB 97 (295 WAR 97) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...shareholders and the public, the law is silent as to whether Parliament intended that this should apply to the whole register or simply the personal information held about the person who is requesting access. The respondent claims 295 Waiariki MB 101 wording does not require that the whole register be made available, so their approach of providing an excerpt is in line with the legislative requirements. [18] The respondent submits that s 56 of the Privacy Act is a useful extr...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 077 Wellington Regional Council v Crosbie [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...unmeritorious point and failed; vi. whether any party has been required to prove facts which, in the Court’s opinion having heard the evidence, should have been admitted by other parties. 3 Goodwin v Wellington City Council [2021] NZEnvC 101 at [41]. 6 [15] The Regional Council submits that it was required to bring the enforcement proceedings against Ms Crosbie and Mr Page to ensure compliance with the resource consent and prevent the ongoing discharge of contamin...

3. [2023] NZIACDT 27 BT v Li (2 November 2023) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 8 at [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 6 From the Registrar [23] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (29 September 2023), with supporting documents. From the complainant [24] There are no submissions from the...

4. OIA-106597.pdf [pdf, 899 KB]

   ...Forensic 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 142 123 127 213 123 109 140 174 154 150 197 232 208 229 188 208 Māori PM External Only 0 0 1 1 3 3 2 4 8 5 0 0 0 1 0 2 PM Immediate Full - Coronial 176 197 215 182 146 107 116 124 103 113 101 91 88 92 75 90 PM Immediate Full - Forensic 8 21 33 15 19 6 7 11 8 11 5 1 4 4 4 3 PM Immediate Lesser - Coronial 11 31 19 24 42 20 11 12 20 19 28 26 31 32 36 47 PM Immediate Lesser - Forensic 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1...

5. Ross v Edwards - Waikite 3A [2024] Māori Appellate Court MB 100 (2024 APPEAL 100) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...Judge M P Armstrong (Presiding) Judge A H C Warren Judge T K T A R Williams Whakataunga: Judgment date 22 May 2024 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā TE KOOTI Reserved Judgment of the Court 2024 Māori Appellate Court MB 101 Hei tīmatanga kōrero Introduction [1] On 5 April 2023, Judge Wara granted an injunction requiring Mr Ross to vacate Waikite 3A and to remove the buildings and his possessions from the land.1 [2] Mr Ross sought a rehearing of...

6. [2024] NZIACDT 18 – KL v Lawlor (24 May 2024) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 8 At [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 6 From the adviser [27] There are no submissions from Mr Lawlor. ASSESSMENT [28] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, pro...

7. 08042025-Immigration-Fiscal-Sustainability-and-System-Integrity-Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...circumstance that is unable to be dealt with under any other provision of the Act, any circumstance that is outside the Department’s control, or any circumstance that poses a challenge to the immigration system. 10 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 11 Ibid at [162] per Blanchard J. exploited workers. Safeguards already exist in the principal Act to ensure that the warrantless search power is not unreasonable.12 28. The i...

8. Big Hill Station Ltd v Hemana - Awarua o Hinemanu Trust (2015) 43 Takitimu MB 218 (43 TKT 218 ) [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...Patrick Parsons [70] Telfer Young [72] Were the legal costs reasonably incurred? [77] Applicant’s submissions [77] Respondents’ submissions [79] The Law [84] Discussion [86] Should an award of costs be made on any alternative basis? [101] Applicant’s submissions [101] Respondents’ submissions [102] The Law [103] Discussion [105] Are the respondents entitled to indemnity under the Trustee Act 1956? [110] Respondents’ submissions [110] Applicant’s submissio...

9. Notice of Motion Kristin School Charitable Trust [pdf, 802 KB]

   ...addresses: The Applicant The Council Email marija.batistich@tomp kinswake.co.nz / kirsty.dibley@tompkins wake.co.nz jim.stabback@aucklandc ouncil.govt.nz Post Kristin School Charitable Trust c/- Tompkins Wake PO Box 2543, Auckland 1010 Att: Marija Batistich / Kirsty Dibley Auckland Council Private Bag 92300, Auckland, 1142 Att: Jim Stabback 4. The Court has waived the requirement under section 274(2B) for you to serve other submitters on the application. All...

10. [2021] NZEnvC 062 Kombi Properties Limited (formerly HFT Limited) v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

    ...instance. [39] He referred to the application of the requirement "to give effect to" higher­ order planning provisions in accordance with the analysis set out by the Supreme Court ('SC') in EDS Inc v The NeJJJ Zealand King Sa/,111011 Co Ltd, 19 noting the "different and less stringent statutoiy test" under s104. This, he submitted, allowed a decision-maker to take those provisions into account but to grant consent even if a proposal does not give effect...