Search Results

1. [2024] NZIACDT 22 – QN v Nandan (29 August 2024) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...(4). 6 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 7 Section 50. 8 Section 51(1). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 10 At [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 10 amount on the top”.11 Ms Nandan even created an account in the complainant’s name with Immigration NZ to which the complainant had no access. [54] The complainant also sent to the Tribunal further subm...

2. BORA Criminal Procedure Bill [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...against the administration of justice and that offence relates to the hearing of an earlier criminal charge in respect of which the person was acquitted (new s 378A(2)). “Offences against the administration of justice” include such things as s 101 (bribery of a judicial officer) and ss 108 and 109 (perjury). A retrial requires High Court approval against stated criteria. Finally the new exception will only be available in respect of acquittal offences occurring after the legislativ...

3. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 s274 evidence chief Anthony King-Turner [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...over a much longer time frame. The use of an overhead camera and automated traffic counter would have achieved a reliable robust result. Hence his deductions are statistically flawed. 33. I disagree with Mr Mitchell’s statement in paragraph 101 that “the new (marina) parking area and associated traffic is likely to have little effect.” He has not taken into account the effects the marina and its associated traffic will have in the future when there will likely be a need fo...

4. Easthope v Pirikia - Te Ngae Farm Trust (2012) 62 Waiariki MB 92 (62 WAR 92) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...determination it follows that, as this trust is a whenua tōpū trust, the use and administration of the land vested in the trust is to be undertaken for the interests of the Ngāti Rangiteaorere hapū. The trust order as a whole 62 Waiariki MB 101 [37] Clause 2 must be read in conjunction with the rest of the trust order. This context confirms that the beneficiaries are members of Ngāti Rangiteaorere, who are descendants of Rangiteaorere. This interpretation is consisten...

5. KOTUHI Shane Hasan Francis Sharif (CSU 2011 WGN 000217) [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...April 2011, on the condition that CYF would remain involved with Shane, to support him and to apply for the independent youth benefit. [11] The Ministry was at this time informed by Mr Kotuhi’s lawyer for the child, that he wished for the s 101 custody order to be totally discharged. [12] Mr Kotuhi’s social worker did not oppose the discharge of the custody order because since early 2011 Mr Kotuhi had refused to live in the approved placement. At discharge the Court ordered...

6. AC v FV & HU LCRO 318/2012 (27 November 2014) [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...employee of Mr FV. [20] The Law Practitioners Act did not regulate the conduct of employees. The only remedies in the Act in respect of an employee’s conduct was to direct that they should not be employed by a lawyer (s 114(2)). [21] Section 101 of the Law Practitioners Act provides that where a complaint is against an employee of a lawyer a charge could have been brought against her before the New Zealand Disciplinary Tribunal if the District Council considered the charge to...

7. VM v ND & HB LCRO 249/2012 (30 November 2015) [pdf, 329 KB]

   ...Committee’s view it would be going too far to criticise Ms HB for not having ensured that Mr ND did so, or that he did so in appropriate terms. She was entitled to assume that Mr ND would attend to those responsibilities and obligations appropriately. 101. Accordingly the Committee makes a determination to take no further action in respect of the complaint against Ms HB, pursuant to s 152(2)(c) of the Act. 1 Standards Committee deter...

8. [2017] NZEnvC 123 Dunedin City Council v Saddle Views Estate Ltd [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...of Mr Thomson. He is of the opinion 12 that SVEL's operations contravene a rule in the operative district plan. That is sufficiently particular to notify SVEL of the case it has to meet. 11 12 Walden v Auckland City Council (1992) NZRMA 101 (NZEnvC) at 103. C R Thomson, affidavit dated 7 April 2011 at para [3]. 8 [22] The notice of opposition claimed the application is an abuse of the process of the court. I do not see any merit in this point (which was not argued at the...

9. BORA Outer Space and High Altitude Activities Bill [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...8 For example, Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v. Chiarelli [1992] 1 S.C.R. 711 at [48]; Ruby v. Canada (Solicitor General), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 3 at [43], [44]; Charkaoui [2004] 3 F.C.R. 32 (F.C.) at [100], [101]; R. v. Shayler, [2002] 2 All E.R. 477 (H.L.); Murray v. United Kingdom (1995), 19 EHRR 193 (E.C.H.R.) at [58]. 9 See Klass v Germany (1979-80) 2 EHRR 214 and subsequent decisions. 10 (1976) AJHR A.4A. 11 See Zaoui v Attorney-General (

10. Matchitt - Waioeka Parish 350A2A (2005) 88 Ōpōtiki MB 99 (88 OPO 99) [pdf, 2 MB]

    ...agreement was conditional on their commitment to pay half of the rates. A letter was also received from one of the owners of the block, Mrs Esther Bartlett (nee Herewini) but added little to the evidence before the Court. Minute Book: 88 OPO 101 It was also apparent that my directions had again not been complied with. Mr Peterson for the applicants explained that the whanau wished to set up a whanau trust in order to consolidate their shares so that Guy John Matchitt and Mona Matchi...