Search Results

1. LCRO 53/2020 YJ v GK (22 April 2021) [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...[86]). • Mr GK has been profiting personally from projects undertaken by another company, being heavily involved but not recorded as either a shareholder or director (at [88]). • Mr GK profited personally from the [Y] Road development (at [101]). • Mr GK “allowed” Mr DQ to have the opportunity to borrow funds with the assistance of the collateral of ABCD (at [108]). • Mr GK ‘persuaded’ his family to lend $1 million to Mr DQ to pursue the [Y] Road developm...

2. LL v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 3 (30 January 2019) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...Registrar are dated 13 December 2018. 3 Section 49(3) & (4). 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Section 53(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 [50] The complainant has withdrawn her complaint to the Authority, but the Authority has not withdrawn the complaint filed in the Tribunal. ASSESSMENT [51] I will deal with each head of complaint in the...

3. MZ v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 12 (4 March 2019) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...4 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 5 Section 49(3) & (4). 6 Section 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Section 53(1). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 ASSESSMENT [47] I will deal with the third head of complaint first as the assessment of the first and second heads, which will be done together, is dependent on the outcome of the third head. (3) Allowing u

4. The Registrar of Immigration Advisers v Niland [2018] NZIACDT 52 (21 December 2018) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...3 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 4 Section 49(3) & (4). 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Section 53(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 12 ASSESSMENT [68] It is useful to group together overlapping heads of complaint, the first grouping being: (1) Failed to hold discussions with the clients beyond the initial assessment which did not include

5. People charged and convicted of homicide offences December 2018 [xlsx, 105 KB]

   ...outcome 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Homicide and related offences total Convicted 104 139 99 79 110 154 118 148 151 146 45% 57% 54% 55% 54% 68% 68% 64% 68% 62% Other proved 0 1 1 4 3 3 10 10 6 12 0% <1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 6% 4% 3% 5% Not proved 121 101 77 55 87 57 46 62 58 69 52% 41% 42% 38% 43% 25% 26% 27% 26% 29% Other 7 3 7 6 3 11 0 13 8 8 3% 1% 4% 4% 1% 5% 0% 6% 4% 3% Total 232 244 184 144 203 225 174 233 223 235 1...

6. [2020] NZIACDT 49 - HQT v Singh (19 November 2020) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...occurrence. He has a well-documented client file containing detailed and regular record keeping. He has induction and ongoing training for staff and has checks in place to 11 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 10, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 12 ensure that unlicensed staff know the boundary of their clerical role. This is regularly enforced by him. [73] According to Mr Singh, the open-plan office environment allows him to directly supervise all th...

7. [2018] NZEmpC 128 Blue Water Hotel Ltd v VBS [pdf, 435 KB]

   ...expeditiously. This was, for example, referred to by the Court of Appeal in Air New Zealand Ltd v McIntosh11 with regard to the Industrial Relations Act 1973,12 and the Labour Relations Act 1987.13 [29] The current Act confirms this policy. Section 101(ab) describes the objects of Part 9 of the Act. The subsection provides that it is desirable for employment relationship problems to be resolved “quickly” by direct discussion between the parties;14 in that context, the Part...

8. Thompson v Van Wijk [2021] NZHRRT 39 [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...useful to consider the general principles relevant to this matter that apply to the three heads of damages as discussed in Hammond v Credit Union Baywide [2015] NZHRRT 6 at [170] and Marshall v IDEA Services (HDC) [2020] NZHRRT 9 at [88]-[92] and [101]-[107]. That is: [89.1] There must be a causal connection between the sexual harassment and the damages sought. 14 [89.2] The plaintiff is not required to establish all three of the heads of damages referred to in HRA, s 92M(1)(c)....

9. Scope of inquiry Minute October 2021 [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...investigation arose because the State was responsible for the deaths of the victims. Her 26 R (Middleton) v West Somerset Coroner [2004] UKHL 10, [2004] 2 AC 182. 27 At [19]. 28 At [20]. 29 At [30]. See also Osman v The United Kingdom [1998] ECHR 101 at [67] where the accused pleaded guilty so the matter was considered by the European Commission of Human Rights to establish the facts and make findings. 30 Osman v The United Kingdom [1998] ECHR 101. 31 At [107]. 20 Honour h...

10. [2022] NZEmpC 151 Kang v Saena Company Ltd [pdf, 378 KB]

    ...at 103. 6 EN Ramsbottom Ltd v Chambers [2000] 2 ERNZ 97 (CA) at [19]−[20]; Ngawharau v Porirua Whanau Centre Trust [2015] NZEmpC 89, [2015] ERNZ 748 at [67]−[69]; and Nath v Advance International Cleaning Systems (NZ) Ltd [2017] NZEmpC 101 at [28]. 7 Cornish Truck & Van Ltd v Gildenhuys [2019] NZEmpC 6, (2019) 16 NZELR 426 at [45]; and Concrete Structures (NZ) Ltd v Ward [2020] NZEmpC 219, [2020] ERNZ 495 at [28]−[29]. 8 Deng v Zheng [2022] NZSC 76 at [48]; see also T...